Double Dipping! | Page 6 | FerrariChat

Double Dipping!

Discussion in 'Ferrari Discussion (not model specific)' started by 134282, Apr 19, 2015.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. El Wayne

    El Wayne F1 World Champ
    Staff Member Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 1, 2002
    18,069
    San Marino, CA
    Full Name:
    L. Wayne Ausbrooks
    Point.

    Counter-point.

    Look, I know what Ferrari has always done in the past. Even so, if they have broken with tradition for whatever reason and duplicated the last six digits on a couple of cars that are different models/years, what does it matter? How does this point to some grand conspiracy? At the most, it's a minor inconsistency (nothing new for Ferrari) and an interesting/unusual tidbit of trivial information.
     
  2. tbakowsky

    tbakowsky Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Professional Ferrari Technician

    Sep 18, 2002
    20,055
    The Cold North
    Full Name:
    Tom
    Well when I order parts the dealer asks for the last 5 digits. Some times I call and don't even give them the model of car, just the last 5 or 8 of the vin number. Not sure if that means anything or not.

    Same goes for ordering parts for any other car. BMW is the last 7. Benz is the last 8. From just those numbers they know exactly what is sitting in your service bay.
     
  3. 134282

    134282 Four Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Aug 3, 2002
    40,647
    California
    Full Name:
    Carbon McCoy
    I can't speak to anyone's diligence, nor their desire to share with the community at large, except my own.

    It just reinforces my point that the serial number is a valid, relevant, important aspect in Ferrari culture, and that no two should be alike, irrespective of the rest of the VIN.
     
  4. 134282

    134282 Four Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Aug 3, 2002
    40,647
    California
    Full Name:
    Carbon McCoy
    There would be no issue since the first 11 characters of each VIN are different. Even if you removed the serial numbers, I could tell you that the first VIN was for a European F12, and I could tell you that the second VIN was for a 2012 North American California 2+2.

    Now if someone decided to one day import that F12 here and convert and register it for road use, it would still be fine. But the F12 owner would run into trouble getting it serviced at a Ferrari dealer because, as you said, if they only asked for his serial number, he would say, "It's 186616," and that comes up in Ferrari's official database as a 2012 California.

    If the 186616 F12 is a press car, it won't be a press car forever. A fully built road-legal F12 won't be displayed at the factory or in the Ferrari museum; at least not forever. It will be sold! To a customer! If a car is built for a customer in a faraway country, and this person stores it and never drives it and keeps it in the garage like a museum piece, is it any more or less counted as an actual Ferrari, built by Ferrari, as one of their cars, than the aforementioned F12?

    I need to amend my previous statement and clarify that Ferrari has, and still does, use multi-system serial number lines. There is a completely separate serial number line for F1 cars, and another completely separate serial number line for some GT cars (but not Challenge cars!), and there was another completely separate serial number line for the 206 GT, 246 GT, 246 GTS, and 308 GT4 Dinos, and another completely separate serial number line for competition/racecars from 1947 through 1970.

    But the Ferrari road cars - the long, main line of road-legal Ferraris has always been on a single serial number system.
     
  5. El Wayne

    El Wayne F1 World Champ
    Staff Member Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 1, 2002
    18,069
    San Marino, CA
    Full Name:
    L. Wayne Ausbrooks
    All of the manufacturers that I've worked with over the years (and you know I've worked with my share of automobile manufacturers) use the last eight digits to identify cars quickly. This provides them with the model year and sequential production number of the car within that model year. For large manufacturers (producing in excess of 999,999 cars per year within a single market), using eight digits also identifies the plant of manufacture.
     
  6. BigTex

    BigTex Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Dec 6, 2002
    79,408
    Houston, Texas
    Full Name:
    Bubba
    Who told you that?

    Is it on letterhead?
    :D :D :D
     
  7. furmano

    furmano Three Time F1 World Champ

    Jul 22, 2004
    32,215
    Colorado
    Full Name:
    Furman
    Also FWIW, Ferrari Club of America uses the four, five, or six number serial number to identify cars registered for judging and displayed at the event. And the results are listed with the serial number, not the full VIN. I believe Cavallino is the same.

    -F
     
  8. John_K_348

    John_K_348 F1 Rookie

    Sep 20, 2013
    2,757
    Boston, MA
    Full Name:
    John E. Kenney
    Well I think the reality of practice is catching up with a high ideal of theory from days long gone. I'm sure Ferrari WANTED to have exclusive serial numbers on all their cars, but when it came to actually assembling them and organizing the different models something else happened. I think creative and artistic craftsmen looked back and said, "Well no one is going to confuse an F12 with an FF and we don't have those number ranges on the logbooks at this end of the plant." And gone was the specific serial number and here to stay was the practical limitation of ever newer models and limited space and resources to track production. It happens in libraries and I have seen it's effects from the 16th century all the way up to the present. Sometimes brand new books never make it to the shelves. They are probably packed along side those "golf clubs" as ballast, weighing down the rear end of that FF as it heads to the waterfront. ;) ... in movies. You can relax now mom! :D
     
  9. rmitchell248

    rmitchell248 Formula 3

    May 26, 2013
    1,071
    Nürburg
    Full Name:
    Robert
    #134 rmitchell248, May 1, 2015
    Last edited: May 1, 2015
    I've gotten through half of the reading here and have to chuckle at the people who say this would not matter as the VIN identifies the car ever since they added more information to the VIN .....

    Sure the entire VIN Would separate these cars in question. However we can break this down to the simplest form.

    Cars are rolling off the line at this moment with a 6 digit serial number stamped under the hood. Not an entire VIN but a placard with nothing but the 6 digit serial number. I find it hard to believe that this stand alone 6 digit number is not implied to be individual to the car it is stamped into.

    While something fishy seems to be up I find it hard to think its a backdoor way to make profits via higher than advertised production numbers.

    Carbon, I'd have to ask of your 51% database how many duplicates do you have? If it's less than 10% I would have to say it would not be done to raise profits while keeping exclusivity.

    For example, if Ferrari is producing 7000 cars this year they could hide another 700 in the serial number conspiracy. But in all reality there would be no detriment to the market if Ferrari were to announce that they're building 7700 cars anyhow.

    We'd need to hit 15%+ before the market would start to suffer and still it could be marginally.

    Now if Ferrari decided to double their Aperta production or LaF production it could hurt markets. However the examples we have are on an F12 and a California. Two cars that they could have just as easily fired another one off the assembly line, counted them correctly and no one would have cared.


    It's odd that these cars are matching serial nr. I just am not convinced it's a scam against the market.

    For all we know they could be cooking their books somehow and building cars that "never existed". Build another 189816 or whatever number you choose and give it to a good colleague or friend for a little cash on the side. Car never existed, rolled off the line with out a few signature and just like that someone's pockets got lined. Now that's a conspiracy theory that I'd find more feasible and exciting.
     
  10. BigTex

    BigTex Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Dec 6, 2002
    79,408
    Houston, Texas
    Full Name:
    Bubba
    Ferraris annual production is a published figure.

    It's no secret Luca was pushed aside because they need to UTILIZE the production capacity!

    That's an accountant talking, obviously!!!
     
  11. BigTex

    BigTex Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Dec 6, 2002
    79,408
    Houston, Texas
    Full Name:
    Bubba
    I think Carby's main effort IS to try to uncover the pattern of the "extra" Enzos, LaFerraris, Apertas..599GTOs

    The big ticket cars...

    A half million $$ here and there, over time it starts to add up!
    :D :D :D



     
  12. rmitchell248

    rmitchell248 Formula 3

    May 26, 2013
    1,071
    Nürburg
    Full Name:
    Robert

    You're correct. But my point is that they could have advertised and sold 20 more of each of the mentioned cars and the market would have been far from flooded. That's 5% in many of the mentioned cars. That's why I said I'd be curious to know how many of these examples there are.
     
  13. rmitchell248

    rmitchell248 Formula 3

    May 26, 2013
    1,071
    Nürburg
    Full Name:
    Robert
    #138 rmitchell248, May 1, 2015
    Last edited: May 1, 2015
    The other thing is that no one is complaining about the market price on these cars. Charge another 100.000 for each Enzo and you've got another 40million. That would cover more than 50 extra cars......

    Slap another 25k on the GTO and you've got 15 million or the equivalent of some 30 cars.

    They all would have been sold with no question. Ferrari puts a price tag and its paid. Why run a conspiracy to make more money when you don't need to.

    Looks at the LaF. They're selling for double or more and they'll all sell. There's a waiting list for some of the cars at 2 million. Ferrari could have charged 250.000 more for that car and sold every one netting a small 100.000.000. most likely the same people that bought them in the first place would have still bought at 250k more .

    Why double serial numbers when you've got a market like that?? To convince me you'll have to find me a better reason than making more money.
     
  14. cscott

    cscott Formula Junior

    Dec 31, 2002
    478
    New Orleans
    Full Name:
    Chris Scott
    If you have half the cars in the database, how many are the same last 5 or 6 numbers. So not "proven" via photograph but was does your database say?
     
  15. El Wayne

    El Wayne F1 World Champ
    Staff Member Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 1, 2002
    18,069
    San Marino, CA
    Full Name:
    L. Wayne Ausbrooks
    #140 El Wayne, May 1, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    I haven't read the entire thread, so forgive me if this has been addressed before. I'm just now taking a serious look at your first post and wanted to point something out.

    You do realize that this is not even a real VIN, don't you? See the 10th digit? And what model year does this signify here in the U.S. (where the car was spotted)? And see how it's misaligned in the window? This appears to be a card placed over the true VIN just to mess with VIN hunters. Methinks you've been punked.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  16. El Wayne

    El Wayne F1 World Champ
    Staff Member Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 1, 2002
    18,069
    San Marino, CA
    Full Name:
    L. Wayne Ausbrooks
    Got your email. :D
     
  17. nickmb

    nickmb Karting

    Dec 11, 2013
    222
    Austin,TX/SoCal
    Full Name:
    Nico
    Now THAT'S a conspiracy theory!
     
  18. GuyIncognito

    GuyIncognito Ten Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 30, 2007
    100,427
    I can't answer the rest of those questions, but I've seen many a misaligned VIN plate on a late model Ferrari.
     
  19. tbakowsky

    tbakowsky Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Professional Ferrari Technician

    Sep 18, 2002
    20,055
    The Cold North
    Full Name:
    Tom
    Me too. The car could have had a windsheild change etc..
     
  20. 134282

    134282 Four Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Aug 3, 2002
    40,647
    California
    Full Name:
    Carbon McCoy
    Please tell me this is a joke... Please, please, please... You have no documented, verifiable sense of humor, and when you are joking, your humor is very dry, so it's extremely difficult to discern those rare moments when you're having a laugh (not a literal laugh since your face never cracks a smile).

    I know you're not an idiot (although I will have some choice words for you in private if this is, indeed, a joke), but I also know that your focus is on older, vintage Ferraris - built decades before the invention of the VIN. So if you're being serious, and your statements are not in jest, let me know, and I will individually address each comment - at lunch, somewhere nice, you pay, and you have to pick me up from my house.

    ...but I'll also have to individually address each of your comments in this thread, so that the other folks who think your post might actually be serious detective work can be enlightened as to why everything you said is not even funny(!) since there are people here who will actually believe it!
     
  21. El Wayne

    El Wayne F1 World Champ
    Staff Member Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 1, 2002
    18,069
    San Marino, CA
    Full Name:
    L. Wayne Ausbrooks
    As you've since learned from our email exchange, I'm mostly having fun at your expense - but I also think that you shouldn't rule out the possibility that this VIN was altered to avoid identification.

    This car was on display by Ferrari, not a dealer or private party. This is exactly why it could possibly have been faked. (See the comment above about the possibility that the windshield was replaced - on a new, factory-owned car? Exactly.)

    You see, people buying old cars might think it's cool to have the "1960 Earls Court Motor Show" car, but people buying new cars don't want a previous "display" car. These cars have been transported all over the place, they've been drooled on and fondled by large numbers of people, and have probably already had dings, scratches, and transportation mishaps repaired prior to being placed for sale - dings, scratches, and mishaps that might have been witnessed by thousands of people. Even if this car was later sold by a dealer as a "demo" (not required by CA law if not placed into demo service, with dealer or manufacturer plates, and regularly driven), it could be important that it not be tied to the car that was previously on display.

    See those cars placed on display at the mall by a local dealer? Those are later sold by that dealer as NEW cars. The thing is that no one tracks Dodge Charger VINs, so who's going to know? Ferrari VINs, on the other hand...
     
  22. Napolis

    Napolis Three Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary Owner

    Oct 23, 2002
    32,118
    Full Name:
    Jim Glickenhaus
    There are a number of Ferraris with the same vin#

    10523 for example
     
  23. El Wayne

    El Wayne F1 World Champ
    Staff Member Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 1, 2002
    18,069
    San Marino, CA
    Full Name:
    L. Wayne Ausbrooks
    Dinos don't count. ;)
     
  24. 134282

    134282 Four Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Aug 3, 2002
    40,647
    California
    Full Name:
    Carbon McCoy
    That's it - you owe me lunch!
     
  25. 134282

    134282 Four Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Aug 3, 2002
    40,647
    California
    Full Name:
    Carbon McCoy
    #150 134282, May 8, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Below is a picture of a 1954 RHD Pininfarina Spyder Series I 500 Mondial, s/n 0424 MD; it is also commonly referred to, in parentheses, as s/n 0564 MD. Why? Well, it's been explained to me like this:

    "The way this works, is that there was an original 0424MD. The owner then purchased a new car from the factory, trading in the old car. To aid the owner in circumventing taxes, the factory gave the new car the same chassis number as the trade in (this way it looks like the car went to Maranello for repairs and came back). The new car is stamped 0424MD and remains that way for life, yet it SHOULD HAVE BEEN 0564MD. The solution today is to refer to this car as 0564(0424)MD. The original 0424MD would then be restamped "0564MD" and we would refer to it today as 0424(0564)MD - if we even knew where it was!"
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     

Share This Page