why do you say interior being worked on?
There appears to be grime on the cloth at the front of the drivers seat and also on the lower carpet behind the driver's seat. To me the scene looks like a shop rather than a showroom. Maybe they are preparing to rework the seats and fit those missing headrests...just a guess.
The early cars appeared with the 'straight ear' KO wheels. Those wheels do look fresh being recently painted. This car 11795 has many unique features and some refer to this one as the 7/8 scale Daytona.
i believe the prototypes wore campagnolo wheels whereas the production cars got cromodoras. the campys had slightly thinner spokes. re the headrests, i recall the yellow spyder prototype debuting without headrests?
No headrests in this image> Thanks for expanding on the wheel details! Image Unavailable, Please Login
Here is another example of a very early 365 GTB/4 with the no headrest style seats> Note there are six upper and seven lower panels on these seats. The earlier car in the b&w picture bottom of post #25 has seven cloth panels each on the upper and lower part of the seat. Image Unavailable, Please Login
Recently a new book was published: "FERRARI au Salon de PARIS 1948-1988" by author Dominique Pascal. I don't have this book myself, but there might be a list of chassis numbers per year?
From experience with Dad's Spyder the headrests make raising and lowering the roof a complete pain in the a... The roof just about clears the head rests if the seats are in the fully forward position. I would imagine that at a motor show where you might want to demonstrate raising and lowering the roof regularly the head rests might be removed just to make life easier.
Not original. At the very least, the centres have been totally re-trimmed - and not correctly. There should be six Daytona stripes running across the top section, and nine Daytona stripes running across the bottom section. In reality, you only tend to actually *see* seven on the bottom section, as the eighth is almost vertical as it curves around the cushion, and the ninth is tucked up and hidden underneath. -Ed
Don't mention it. FWIW, the real pedants will be along in a moment to tell you that - since there is a dividing line running down the centre of the seat panels - there are technically TWELVE stripes on the top and EIGHTEEN on the bottom! -Ed
I own the Triumph TR250 which was on exhibit at the same show in the Standard-Triumph stand which was located immediately next to the Ferrari and Pininfarina stands and am looking for a photo which may show mine in the background.
1968 London Motor Show - all photos from Autocar magazine. -Ed Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
1966 London Motor Show - all images from Autocar magazine. -Ed Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
1967 London Motor Show - all images from Autocar magazine. -Ed Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
1969 London Motor Show - info from CAR magazine (no photos published). -Ed Image Unavailable, Please Login
1975 London Motor Show - images from Autocar magazine. -Ed Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
I'll have a look for this photo tonight. It may well have been featured. During this period of time, there is no question that the coverage of the London Motor Show (particular in Autocar) was skewed towards UK manufacturers. Articles were introduced with a barrage of statistics puffing up the British motor industry, and the vast majority of the cars pictured were made here. Photos tended to illustrate the mainstream, mass produced family cars rather than niche marques. Even though Ferrari and the like were exotic and exciting, they were rarely featured in any detail. In the 1969 Autocar show round-up, there are no images whatsoever of any Ferraris on show. Imagine that being the case today! -Ed