Formula 1 set to agree plan on 2017 rule changes | Page 2 | FerrariChat

Formula 1 set to agree plan on 2017 rule changes

Discussion in 'F1' started by DF1, Apr 21, 2016.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. greyboxer

    greyboxer F1 World Champ

    Dec 8, 2004
    12,737
    South East
    Full Name:
    Jimmie
    Autosport are reporting engine rules agreement too now
     
  2. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    Mine too.

    As I keep saying, "it's hard, as it damn well should be!"

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  3. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    43,183
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas

    Forgive me for assuming people want good sounding engines.
     
  4. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ

    Jun 3, 2006
    28,008

    By the same token, you shouldn't assume that all F1 followers are interested in the hi-tec side of F1; most people, I think, are actually interested in the RACING itself.

    If the increase complexity is working against the racing, the fans will lose interest.

    F1 has to decide if it organises a engineers championship or a drivers championship.
     
  5. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    The WCC.

    The WDC.

    ;)
    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  6. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ

    Jun 3, 2006
    28,008

    The engineers championship now is really a battle between Mercedes and Ferrari.
    Renault is far behind, and Honda ...

    The other teams cannot compete: they are just customers getting inferior engines.
    Sauber, Williams, Haas, Toro Rosso, Manor or Force India will only get the crumbs.


    The drivers championship is really becoming a misnomer, since some of the best players do not have access to competitive hardware.
     
  7. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ

    Jun 3, 2006
    28,008

    The engineers championship now is really a battle between Mercedes and Ferrari.
    Renault is far behind, and Honda ...

    The other teams cannot compete: they are just customers getting inferior engines.
    Sauber, Williams, Haas, Toro Rosso, Manor or Force India will only get the crumbs.


    The drivers championship is really becoming a misnomer, since some of the best players do not have access to competitive hardware. After 3 GPs, the title is already decided.
     
  8. BMWairhead

    BMWairhead Formula 3

    Sep 11, 2009
    1,067
    Portland, OR
    Full Name:
    Ted
    I didn't and don't...

    I quite intentionally limited my posting to my personal opinion...as indicated by the emphasis on the words "I" and "my."

    "Sounds good" to one person is hearing damage to another. "Sounds fine" to me is too quiet for others...

    My only point was/is: by all means, have an opinion... just don't automatically assume that everybody shares that opinion. It's not spec. racing and we're not spec. fans.
     
  9. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

  10. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Nov 20, 2002
    17,673
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    [size=+3]BS!![/size]

    Have you ever heard a Ferrari Dino or an Alfa Romeo GTV6 or even my 156v6. Wonderful engines. What F1 have done wrong is the included angle of 90 degrees is simply wrong!, it should be 60-ish or 120 degrees.
    Pete
     
  11. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Nov 20, 2002
    17,673
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    Why have they made the 2017 car even LONGER? They are already very long cars.

    Confused.
    Pete
    ps: BTW the grooved tyres were not just (?) to reduce cornering speed but to improve passing as the theory was that when you go to pass you go off the clean part of the track onto dirty areas (dirtied by rubber lumps) the grooves tyres would deal with this better than full slicks.
     

Share This Page