Instrument fuse blowing and alternator stoping | Page 4 | FerrariChat

Instrument fuse blowing and alternator stoping

Discussion in '456/550/575' started by [email protected], Sep 17, 2016.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. ///Mink

    ///Mink Formula Junior Silver Subscribed

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2006
    Messages:
    824
    Location:
    Fair Oaks, CA
    Full Name:
    Tom Mink
    Awesome work, and thank you for posting the steps you took in tracking it down. I guarantee this thread is going to save someone's ass in the future.
     
  2. Cribbj

    Cribbj Formula 3 BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Messages:
    2,316
    Location:
    Cooke City MT, The Coolest Small Town in America
    Full Name:
    John
    What a Rube Goldberg design for a sensor! Seems that I've seen pendulums in these things before, but never a sliding brick, and especially an apparatus that can allow the brick to slide off its track..... I'm wondering if that set screw on top of the cage for the brick is intended to keep it from sliding past that point?

    I've got the sensor dismounted from my car so will have a looksee as you did, Pete.
     
  3. Zedtt

    Zedtt Formula Junior

    Joined:
    May 29, 2005
    Messages:
    381
    Location:
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Terry
    Nice sleuthing Pete! Thanks for posting! Now that you have provided leads, following are some references to that same part. Item #14 in the Ricambi Electrical Boards section..part # 154310. Apparently also used in 355 and 456 models. Discussed starting on page F19 of the WSM. and particularly defined on F24 of WSM.

    ELECTRICAL BOARDS - Ricambi America, Inc.

    154310 FILTERED ACCLEROMETER - Ricambi America, Inc.

    Ferrari 550 456 GT Vertical Acceleration Sensor 154310 Filtered Accelerometer | eBay
     
  4. Vereeken

    Vereeken Formula Junior

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    264
    Location:
    Belgium
    Great job much respect.

    What I do not understand is how unplugging alternator fixes the short. In your drawing the alternator does not play a role.
     
  5. 166&456

    166&456 Formula 3

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2010
    Messages:
    1,723
    Location:
    Amsterdam
    The alternator was a wild goose chase, as was the water pump. That can happen with electrical problems like this.
    That sensor is either using piezo effect to measure acceleration, or bounce of the brick against that setscrew pin. I suspect that the brick is not supposed to be held in by friction but should be glued to the white ceramic material. It is definitely not designed to slide and I think it will fail again if not glued. The deflection of the ceramic provides a raw signal (by piezo or bounce) that can be measured and converted into a useful signal. The setscrew under the black goo is a calibration, do not tamper with it. I suspect that the white silicone is for damping and to cover the fixture of the ceramic.
    Be careful as the ceramic can break easily.
    If it is using contact bounce, then I think the brick should be glued in with a conductive glue.
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2016
  6. maranello72

    maranello72 Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2009
    Messages:
    354
    Location:
    Munich, Germany
    Full Name:
    Stefano
    I would have thought the brick had to be glued as well, except there are no signs of glue there. Instead, it appears to be pressed against the pressure sensor (as you said it is most likely piezo) by a calibration screw which applies a preset force. Any measured deviation from this preset indicates a vertical acceleration.
    This force also stops the brick from sliding out when you turn hard!
    In Pete's case it looks like the screw came loose and calibration was lost, so I would just replace the sensor...

    Stefano
     
  7. 166&456

    166&456 Formula 3

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2010
    Messages:
    1,723
    Location:
    Amsterdam
    Hi Stefano, it could be piezo or it could be using a bounce effect, I edited my post since your reply. Anyway I am convinced it should be affixed to the ceramic somehow. If not then one jolt has the potential for ruining the sensor, that surely cannot have been the engineer's choice...?
     
  8. maranello72

    maranello72 Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2009
    Messages:
    354
    Location:
    Munich, Germany
    Full Name:
    Stefano
    It is an unusual design for an acceleration sensor. The arm onto which the brick sits does not appear to be free to swing, there is a metal protrusion from the base beneath it. That's why I thought the brick was sandwiched between the pressure sensor and the screw.
    Magneti Marelli must have patented this, so I'll try to dig out the patent later, I'm curious now....

    Stefano
     
  9. Vereeken

    Vereeken Formula Junior

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    264
    Location:
    Belgium
    Hey at least I had the gold part right!
     
  10. fastradio

    fastradio F1 Rookie BANNED Professional Ferrari Technician

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    3,664
    Location:
    New England
    Full Name:
    David Feinberg
    Outstanding diagnostic work, Pete! (I couldn't agree with you more; the 550 WSM wiring diagrams are some of the worst ever to come out of Ferrari...)
     
  11. moorfan

    moorfan Formula Junior

    Joined:
    May 11, 2009
    Messages:
    809
    Location:
    Central Virginia
    Full Name:
    Pete
    No, this brick seems to be intended to freely move. The surface the brick sits on appears to possibly be an electrical contact point, and the brick does NOT touch the contact point above when it is sitting flat on the surface. There is less than a mm clearance between the brick and that contact point. There were no loose screws anywhere else. I am guessing that when the car "jumps" vertically the brick flops up and touches the upper contact while still making contact with the lower contact "mat".
    Would love to hear someone who is actually an engineer comment on this (not me). :)
     
  12. moorfan

    moorfan Formula Junior

    Joined:
    May 11, 2009
    Messages:
    809
    Location:
    Central Virginia
    Full Name:
    Pete
    Yes, as others said it was a complete red herring. I was rooting around under the car bumping stuff as I was doing it and I may have jostled the brick inside that sensor a bit right prior to unplugging the regulator, which may have temporarily resolved the short.

    A few days back I briefly had the car working again without a short, but the fuse blew immediately when I slammed the hood to take it on a test drive. That was another clue that it was likely something in the engine compartment causing the problem.
     
  13. Konadog06

    Konadog06 Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Messages:
    963
    Location:
    Daytona Beach, Florida
    Full Name:
    Bill
    Very well done Pete! Great post as usual.
    Many thanks!
    Bill
     
  14. 166&456

    166&456 Formula 3

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2010
    Messages:
    1,723
    Location:
    Amsterdam
    I do have an EE degree so my comment should have some validity ;). From a mechanics standpoint, if the "jumping brick" were true, it should be better contained. Electrically that would produce an unpredictable signal relative to acceleration. A piezo element with an attached weight is quite a common way of making such a sensor. I would look for signs how it would be affixed to that ceramic, I am sure you will find signs that it was.
    Oh and be careful, that ceramic really is quite fragile. Amhik :)
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2016
  15. Canuck550

    Canuck550 Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2015
    Messages:
    462
    Location:
    Incognito
    Full Name:
    RJA
    Congrats that is some nice sleuthing
    Ron
     
  16. maranello72

    maranello72 Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2009
    Messages:
    354
    Location:
    Munich, Germany
    Full Name:
    Stefano
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2016
  17. fatbillybob

    fatbillybob Two Time F1 World Champ Consultant Owner

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    29,274
    Location:
    socal
    Given this info i would assume this unit part of traction control. So pete does the asr work like before? Can you do a high G turn and then get an asr fault implying the brick slid off?
     
  18. AVIMAX

    AVIMAX Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2014
    Messages:
    714
    Location:
    Toronto
    Full Name:
    Ryan
    From what I see in the WSM, the sensor is part of the adaptive suspension system, but I suspect since the instrument panel died when the fuse blew, you wouldn't see the suspension fault warning light in the display. That warning light would have made it easier to track down the faulty part! I think the traction control uses input from the suspension ECU, so it is probably used for traction control indirectly.
     
  19. Vereeken

    Vereeken Formula Junior

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    264
    Location:
    Belgium
    I think the metal brick needs to be glued.

    Why would you use an overweight brick in such a contraption. So that it touches the black pin at the top when the car rolls over (or gets a violent schock).
    I have the impression that the metal brick is at the end of a plastick board and that plastic board is suspended (as in not supported) for 2/3 of its lenght, basically acting like a jumping board.

    Who is going to solve this mysterie?
     
  20. ferraridriver

    ferraridriver F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2002
    Messages:
    4,152
    Location:
    Bay Area Calif.
    Full Name:
    Dave
    It has to be glued or else how would they be able to be shipped as a spare part?
     
  21. Zedtt

    Zedtt Formula Junior

    Joined:
    May 29, 2005
    Messages:
    381
    Location:
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Terry
    To me it looks as if the brick is not glued but held in place by some kind of retainer covered in black at the top of the housing Look at the apparent dimple impressed in the brick. I suspect that the retainer applies enough "pressure" in retaining the brick to allow it to move about the pivot point and provide input to the sensors in the main flat contact surface of the brick. The brick likely need to be able to move in order to work effectively. If this theory is accurate, a safety issue (non-performance of traction control) could result if the ECU erroneously believes that the car is stable.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  22. fatbillybob

    fatbillybob Two Time F1 World Champ Consultant Owner

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Messages:
    29,274
    Location:
    socal
    If as the patent implies "capacitive", then the brick must move to change capacitance the sensor can read. So the black looking thing probably is a set screw to hold the brick in some tight usable range which has failed. That is probably why there's no protection on the other screws. The brick coming off would be a failed sensor. How much pressure on the set screw is anyone's guess. Oh how ferrari!
     
  23. moorfan

    moorfan Formula Junior

    Joined:
    May 11, 2009
    Messages:
    809
    Location:
    Central Virginia
    Full Name:
    Pete
    I actually DID see the suspension warning, as it was only the instruments that went out. The multifunction center display is apparently on another fuse.
     
  24. Robje001

    Robje001 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2021
    Messages:
    3
    Full Name:
    R Ercevic
    Moorfan,
    Thank you for all the investigative work, the explanation and the pictures....
    Was really getting to that point where one would start to pull some hairs... Have had 100% same issue... You contribution was a life saver!!! Thanks!
     
    Qavion likes this.

Share This Page