Derek's 308 engine rebuild | Page 7 | FerrariChat

Derek's 308 engine rebuild

Discussion in '308/328' started by derekw, Oct 16, 2016.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. derekw

    derekw Formula 3

    Sep 7, 2010
    1,521
    London, UK
    Full Name:
    Derek W
    I didn't put anything on them and don't plan to unless someone has a good idea. Years ago I put polyurethane clear on some carbs and it was nice for a year or two but then turned yellow and started coming off.
     
  2. Newman

    Newman F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner Professional Ferrari Technician

    Dec 26, 2001
    14,523
    Canada
    Full Name:
    Newman
    I think getting away from the square tooth design would be a waste of money because I don't see belt failures solely because of that. A boxer takes the same belts and pulleys and its not uncommon for someone to go 10+ years on a set of those. Additionally they're driving 2 more cylinders worth of valves without failure. Its the oil and coolant leaks and ugliness of the engine that prompts the EO service.
     
  3. Brian A

    Brian A F1 Rookie

    Dec 21, 2012
    3,153
    SanFrancisco BayArea
    Full Name:
    1983 US 308 GTS QV
    I know that experience and empirical data are more important than theory. However, "theoretically" the cam belt system is just a few pulleys and a tensioner system. I don't understand what other consequences there would be to pulley system changes.

    I apologize for being slow to let go of the idea, its just that "theoretically" modern round-tooth belts have much longer service lives than our square-tooth belts and it would be great to increase the safety margin in the system since it is often cited as a point of vulnerability in the engine design.
     
  4. miketuason

    miketuason F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Feb 24, 2006
    15,833
    Cerritos, CA.
    Full Name:
    Mike
  5. Newman

    Newman F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner Professional Ferrari Technician

    Dec 26, 2001
    14,523
    Canada
    Full Name:
    Newman
    I agree the round toothed belt is better no question. I just wouldn't do it thinking i'm extending my service interval is all so its hard to justify the purchase if you already have factory steel pulleys. If they're plastic then I would consider the upgrade just to get away from pulleys made by fisher price.
     
  6. detroiter

    detroiter Karting

    Apr 30, 2013
    205
    Munich, Bayern
    Full Name:
    Carter
    Wow that grey color is fantastic. Been thinking of putting my resale red 308 back to the original maroon metallic, but this makes me think grey might be nice.
     
  7. derekw

    derekw Formula 3

    Sep 7, 2010
    1,521
    London, UK
    Full Name:
    Derek W
    #157 derekw, Jan 28, 2017
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2017
    Brian, I thought about this a bit and read a few papers on belt design/failure. Most timing belt failure is fatigue related and originates inside the belt where the stress concentrations beneath the tooth root start to form cracks at the rubber/cord interface. The trapezoidal toothed belts have a higher stress concentration due to their shape while the round toothed have lower stress concentration and require lower tensions due to the bigger surface area of the deeper teeth. So they are better.

    The question then is whether you will change your belts less often (in time or miles) if you use the round toothed belts. For a car that will see a lot of miles in 5 years, I would definitely go with the round toothed belts as the advantage of lower stress concentrations are important. But for the low mileage most of these cars do I would worry about age hardening of the rubber long before they have any real miles on them. I'll probably stick with the square toothed belts unless a bunch of people want round teeth and an order becomes cost effective. I would change either belt at 5-7 years depending on mileage and climate (hot is worse.) I'd mostly want to check the tensioners and drive bearings but would put in new belts while in there.
     
  8. derekw

    derekw Formula 3

    Sep 7, 2010
    1,521
    London, UK
    Full Name:
    Derek W
    #158 derekw, Jan 28, 2017
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Not mine, but gives an idea:
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  9. Brian A

    Brian A F1 Rookie

    Dec 21, 2012
    3,153
    SanFrancisco BayArea
    Full Name:
    1983 US 308 GTS QV
    Thank you for the detailed and analytical explanation. It makes a lot of sense.

    I don't put a whole lot of miles on the car -- about 2,000 miles per year -- so it sounds like I may as well stick with my factory square-tooth pulley configuration. All is well.

    Thanks again.
     
  10. derekw

    derekw Formula 3

    Sep 7, 2010
    1,521
    London, UK
    Full Name:
    Derek W
    ... unless you have almost 40 year old plastic pulleys! Mine had tiny cracks and dye penetrant went deep into cracks where the guide flanges meet the teeth. These are known to break off. I'm amazed they have lasted this long given the years and heat.
     
  11. PDB

    PDB Formula Junior

    Feb 1, 2011
    602
    Leicestershire, UK
    Full Name:
    Paul
    May be a silly question, but could the "oil holes" on each cam lobe simply be the marks left by a previous hardness test?

    Great thread and please keep the details coming.

    Paul
     
  12. derekw

    derekw Formula 3

    Sep 7, 2010
    1,521
    London, UK
    Full Name:
    Derek W
    #162 derekw, Jan 31, 2017
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Paul, you may be right. I couldn't get a piece of piano wire into them so they are either solidly blocked or hardness indentations.

    After baking the manifolds the stuck-on gasket bits were quite brittle and crumbled with a sharp chisel. I blunted the sharp corners and held it upside-down to reduce the risk of gouging. Tried some Goof-Off on a few hard to reach gasket bits and it worked far better than the gasket spray.

    After the gasket was all off I sanded it with 320 paper on our nice flat granite counter-top. You can see where coolant has etched the surface after sanding it all smooth and flat.

    I plan to clean the other castings this week and start on the carbs or the gearbox.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  13. derekw

    derekw Formula 3

    Sep 7, 2010
    1,521
    London, UK
    Full Name:
    Derek W
    #163 derekw, Feb 1, 2017
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    So I picked up the Suzuki G15/16 0.5mm rod bearings and filed off the back of the tab so I could check them in a 308 rod. The Suzuki rod big ends are 47.018mm ID and the 308 is 47.13mm so I didn't expect them to have any crush given that the .112mm diameter difference would give .112x3.14159=0.352mm in circumference difference (about .014".)

    They fit as expected and I think anyone wanting a 5 thou or 15 thou regrind should go this route. Resize the rods to 47.018 and cut a tab groove on the other side. The bearings are 18mm wide and the tabs 3.95mm wide at the edge of the bearing (on the left if the Ferrari bearing tabs are on the right, see pic.) Best part is you can get King or Clevite bearings for about $50-80 (or these ACL bearings for $12 x 2.)
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  14. derekw

    derekw Formula 3

    Sep 7, 2010
    1,521
    London, UK
    Full Name:
    Derek W
    #164 derekw, Feb 1, 2017
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    For those not following the cam pulley thread, I figured out a clever way to make the pulleys easily adjustable about 10 degrees. I'll get a couple of the pulley dowel holes made 9-10mm to take an eccentric pin and sleeve. This would allow about 10-12 degrees of adjustment with very little extra cost and complexity. The drive torque is usually not through the dowel pin but through the friction between the flange and the cam but the sleeve will be locked in place by the cam bolt head anyway. Anyone who doesn't want to play with the timing can just use the fixed holes.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  15. derekw

    derekw Formula 3

    Sep 7, 2010
    1,521
    London, UK
    Full Name:
    Derek W
    #165 derekw, Feb 8, 2017
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    I did the same cleaning trick with my timing cover-- Gunk degreaser soaked for 15min, scrub, dunk in hot water and laundry detergent, left it overnight, scrubbed again 5 min with brass brush and rinse.

    Picked up some bearings today (pilot and cam drive.) The SKF pilot and inner drive bearings were made in Bulgaria and Argentina, but look where my outer NTN C4 with viton seals and good grease were made!
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  16. K1010

    K1010 Karting

    Jan 20, 2012
    169
    Germany/Los Angeles
    Full Name:
    JK
    Hi Derek,

    can you tell me where you got those NTN bearings from? I can't find them anywhere.

    Thank you
     
  17. derekw

    derekw Formula 3

    Sep 7, 2010
    1,521
    London, UK
    Full Name:
    Derek W
    My local bearing shop (General Bearing Service.) They were CA$15.62 each. They are NTN 6203LLUA1C4 (A1 is the standard aftermarket grease which is Mobil Polyrex EM.) If you don't find any, send me a PM and I can send some next time I'm in the US (March break I'm down in Orlando giving the rat my wallet.)
     
  18. derekw

    derekw Formula 3

    Sep 7, 2010
    1,521
    London, UK
    Full Name:
    Derek W
    I'm ordering JK some of the bearings and also some similar NTN viton 6202 C3 bearings for my water pump. Before I put in the order, does anyone else need some? $40 for 2 incl. post.
     
  19. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,468
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
  20. derekw

    derekw Formula 3

    Sep 7, 2010
    1,521
    London, UK
    Full Name:
    Derek W
    #170 derekw, Feb 9, 2017
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2017
    Scott, The hard part is finding ones with C4 clearance and hi temp grease. The original SKF with HT51 is no longer available and was never available with viton seals. I asked a friend at SKF and they are not available. Best I found was HT22. These are a weak link since the nitrile rubber seals of the originals can't cope with the heat so the seals fail and then the bearings. C4 clearance is also required due to the running temperature. If you use standard bearings they won't last very long!
     
  21. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,468
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    How hot are you expecting the front cover and bearings to get? The most I've ever recorded on one was about 225*F and that was an engine that was overheating and running terrible. Avg temps hover between 160~190*F.

    C4 has a greater internal radial clearance then C3 and they overlap each other between 30~40mm OD as well. The clearances are not wholly due to running temps but also the press fit and the material of the bore housing the shaft material and it's thermal characteristics. The shaft and bore will also be operating at nearly the same temps so there is no big delta in temps or expansion there as well. Given the nominal bore dia, the cast aluminum housing, C3 or C4 would work just fine. In reality the radial clearance is effected more by a temp gradient between the inner and outer races, that is not really at play here. The stator on an electric motor though, it is.
     
  22. derekw

    derekw Formula 3

    Sep 7, 2010
    1,521
    London, UK
    Full Name:
    Derek W
    You seemed to be suggesting that standard 6203-2RS bearings are suitable. So do you suggest 6203-2RS with C3 clearance are suitable?
     
  23. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,468
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    I wouldn't get hung up on C3 vs C4 as we're dealing with microns of radial clearance as it pertains to temperature deltas between the races. Lots of threads over the yrs here discussing and covering the various bearings. If C4 is easy to get and inexpensive use that, if not and C3 is then use that one. I'd be more concerned with bearing MFG and cheap copies vs known good ones. SKF, *** & Timken are safe bets, personally I prefer Timken -Aerospace & DoD spec :)
     
  24. derekw

    derekw Formula 3

    Sep 7, 2010
    1,521
    London, UK
    Full Name:
    Derek W
    I would still go for a C4 since, as you point out, the ranges overlap a fair bit and about a third of C3 bearings will be in the standard range and may be too tight. Why risk it? I would also go for a high temp grease since most standard greases will be near their limits so will break down faster. Nitrile seals are also near their limit and will degrade much faster than viton/FKM.
     
  25. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,468
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    I don't see the risk honestly, that's just me. If your worried about the seals go for the metal ones. Don't understand the fear about the grease either as the bearing is rated for a specific operating use and should last it's rated cycles as long as it's mfg by a good bearing co. The front timing cover is just not an overly harsh environment in terms of temperature and chemical exposure. The bearing isn't even exposed to the engine oil either.
     

Share This Page