I realize Ferraris don't make any sense, never have, never will. But, but, here's a nice Testarossa for Maranello or F430 money: 1990 Ferrari Testarossa Serial Number 84596 - main page Seriously?
So how is that a Ferrari price??? He was seriously taken advantage of and he was a co participant of a screwing. If not this it would have been a bad boat or airplane transaction. Stupid people and their money will soon be parted. What else is there to say? How bad do I need to feel for dumb people? If not this he would have sent money to some government functionary in an African country needing to move some unaccounted for money between accounts. Some people cannot be helped. You are asking the wrong question. What I do not understand is how do such gullible people have the ability to write checks like that? Or as I once said to a former service manager "Please tell me he inherited the money".
That's ridiculous....One of the cars I was looking at had a reman engine FROM Ferrari installed at a dealer and the total price was around $26k...granted it was a 360 and not a TR, but in no world should a new engine cost 1/3 less than a belt service....that car did go on to have about $30k of service completed by the new owner, but I think roughly half of that was new cats/exhaust.
Actually it was "only" a $34,215 engine out service. Reading the details of that service though......(carried out by Maranello Sales Ltd, so already you're talking main dealer pricing): "A 30k engine-out service was done, including compression test, check cooling system, replace cam belts and aux belts and all new gaskets, new clutch assembly, new spark plugs, A/C service, new water pump, machine cylinder heads, replaced both coolant thermostats and radiator thermal switch plus flush and replace all filters and fluids. Total invoice was £26,554.13 ($34,215.00 USD).Mileage was 12,302 miles" ... that sounds suspiciously to Me more like blown head gaskets due to the engine overheating, rather than just a standard engine out service. If that is the case, then with main dealer pricing on top, along with VAT, £26,554.13 ($34,215.00 USD) doesn't seem so out of place.
Well quite. It is clearly not a standard engine out service which would have been something like a tenth of the price. Jonathan
Certainly that is possible in which case the ad should say Car poorly owned, maintained and treated like a rental car to the degree that at very few miles it required major mechanical intervention to make it sellable. Major obfuscation to refer to a job like that as a service. The term service carries with it a connotation of routine, scheduled servicing.
Ferrari pricing is a narrative and the price depends on who believes the narrative. The only one I know about is that Ferrari prices never go down. Just because a car has been for sale over a year doesn't change that.
That is also my firm opinion. I would just add that it can be a bit tricky on modern Ferraris not to believe the narrative and ask for a second opinion, on a small country like mine. Kind regards, Nuno.
I brag to my friends about how much I spend to maintain my car. It makes me feel big and powerful and wealthy. I spend more just on an oil change than your entire car is worth. It's a matter of ego you see. So much so that I don't notice the other people shaking their head at the absurd stupidity.
The cost of maintenance on the engine out variety is why Ferrari is now paying for maintenance for 3 years and no more engine out service is required. It costs a ton for the older cars.
I could be wrong. I don't think "engine out" is the cause of high service bills. Look at Porsche. I also don't it is the labor rates. Ferrari mechanics are no more expensive than say Porsche types. Parts, however, make a yuge difference. Plus, Ferrari dealers charge what they want because they can. I don't think I ever took my car to the dealership and came out less than $1,000.
when you had your Ferraris you always got serviced at Ferrari of Houston? things have changed a bunch since then! dealership rates have been pretty stable and they have started to expand beyond just the newer models. independents on the other hand have raised rates to dealer levels or even beyond as they developed reputations as more experienced than the new young techs at dealerships who weren't born when the 308 came out. independents have also started to work on the late model Ferraris too buying SD's or at least tools like the Leonardo. it is what it is, but I miss the independents of 15 years ago low rates, high expertise, and fast turnover times. independents are now slammed, slow, expensive, and quality has even suffered as they have brought help in to keep up. I'm happy for the independents as they are getting the type of business they always deserved, but the customer experience has suffered.
Yep. In fact, FOH is why I sold the Maranello. It blew the front hoses in 2004 during the FFQC. I had FOH truck it back to the shop, and they fixed the FRONT hoses. Four years later, the REAR hoses blew on a back road romp. When I asked FOH why they didn't replace the rear hoses at the same time as the front, I got a shrug. That was the final straw. I loved the car, but it cost me over $3 a mile to keep running. Plus it needed more work. I sold the car to a collector, who put at least another $20k in parts into the car, not counting his full-time mechanic's time. Too rich for my blood. Ferraris work if you just look at them in your garage. But up until say the F360, don't try driving them.
I wonder if there is significant variability in the build process as well. Some cars after coffee and on a Wed afternoon don't have many problems. But right after a holiday weekend after alot of Prosecco.. all that is out the window. Some variability in the operating conditions as well. Too hot and too cold with too few or too short operating cycles might lead to wear. I'm convinced the only way you truly get perfection in a repair is if you do it yourself or your mechanic likes you.
that's not universally true, but I do know some case of that you and couple friends. we've had great luck, but had a great shop in Norwoods and religiously kept up with periodic services even if not squawks. I had two friends with Ferraris for 10+ years that never drive them because they are afraid. Of course they haven't even changed belts in those 10 years, so own fault and a shame for the car.
Anybody who knows anything about manufacturing will tell you quality has to be designed in, i.e., you plan the work, you work the plan. The first step for Toyota and Honda was to simplify everything. They have one inline four cylinder motor they use for all models and brands, which they built over and over and over again. They also implemented continuous improvement, which enabled them to build it better over and over and over again. Finally, they listened to their customers and addressed whatever issues came up. It is my understanding Ferrari does little of this. They got better under Luca. The Fiat years are best forgotten, even the F40s where little more than kit cars. But they still have a long way to go. Take the header issue, for example. There is no excuse for this, none. So why doesn't Ferrari pay more attention to quality control? Simple, they sell everything they make at premium prices, so why brother? Plus, fixing problems is the main profit center for the dealers (when you only sell maybe 60 cars a year, profits from sales only goes so far.) They're great cars. But I think potential buyers need to understand what they're getting into. As a salesman once told me, "If you want to run with the big dogs, you better be prepared to lift your leg high."
you are way off base here, the 328 is one of the most quality cars we've ever had and we're a Toyota family. my BMW was the worse car, but I think that goes along with Germans are so smart they make things fail at 6 years when warranty ends and you need a new one. Ferraris are over engineered and especially the classic ones didn't need all the cheap creature comforts that everyday cars need. if there is any blame, it is people letting cars sit in the garage and not having them properly maintained.
I disagree. It's not about "over engineering." It's about having a stabilized system for manufacturing that produces consistent results. If Ferraris are over engineered, why do manifolds keep failing? Then when you add Ferrari's habit of using the cheapest possible stuff for the bits and pieces, the result is not good. The hoses that blew on the Maranello? They were so cheap, Pep Boys would be embarrassed to have them in their dumpster.
I'm talking 308, 328, TR, BB vs. your piece of crap (your words) 550. Also from your Maranello era is problems with the 355 Manifolds and that also started the sticky issues. The 328 has no "issues" sticky parts included.
There has been sub-component failure on MANY european cars now. 50k miles and the window regulators and door cables in modern Porsches will go. It's the plastic. Of course it's out of warranty at that point. 328 has CIS fuel injection. Just bumped into an owner that had the mixture go rich on his this last weekend. Good luck finding someone who can diagnose CIS well who doesn't throw 3 expensive parts at it before crying uncle. It's the reason I sold my 928.