Horner: F1 should be polar opposite of Formula E | Page 6 | FerrariChat

Horner: F1 should be polar opposite of Formula E

Discussion in 'F1' started by Bas, Aug 9, 2017.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. DeSoto

    DeSoto F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    Messages:
    7,858
    Well, I´m not really interested in baseball or boxing. I like motorsport and I´m interested in the hardware, not only in the drivers.

    As I always say, the cars are still desgined and built by humans, so those guys are part of the game too.
     
  2. Beau365

    Beau365 Formula 3

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,284
    Location:
    Congested London
    Full Name:
    Beau
    That's your penchant, fair enough.

    As we can only hear the engines, most audiences only care about whether they are fast and loud. Even then, lots of viewers switch channels unless there is some human drama occurring. Processional laps, despite the hidden tech, are a big switch off for the majority of viewers. I am certain Liberty Media will be factoring this into their future equation.
     
  3. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    27,888

    +1
     
  4. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    27,888

    Motor racing isn't just entertainment. Technical excellence is part of F1 and I hope that won't be diluted, just to make a show.
     
  5. Ferrari 308 GTB

    Ferrari 308 GTB F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2015
    Messages:
    8,069
    Location:
    Tropical
    Technical excellence ..as in Honda.
     
  6. Beau365

    Beau365 Formula 3

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,284
    Location:
    Congested London
    Full Name:
    Beau
    Technical excellence has diluted the human craft of wheel to wheel racing.
     
  7. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    27,888
    Wheel-to-wheel racing exists far more in lower categories like F3, GP3, GP2 or even Indycar than in F1, because they are specs series where everybody drives the same car.
    F1 isn't a specs series (yet) and has always accepted diversity and disparity between cars, engines, etc...
    So obviously some sort of merit order make it impossible to have constant wheel-to-wheel during a race; it's the exception rather than the norm.
     
  8. It's Ross

    It's Ross Formula 3

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    2,028
    Location:
    Barrington, Ill. USA
    Full Name:
    Ross
    Perhaps not the essence but a huge part unless you are drag racing.
    I also miss re-fueling. Are the now mandatory(and ridiculous) stops to change to a less than optimum tire supposed to substitute for that bit of strategy?
     
  9. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    27,888
    These mandatory tyre changes were introduce to instil some unknown in the race, as an attempt to disturb the running order. Just like adding another unknown in the equation.

    All that looks so artificial to me; I just don't see the point to it.

    I could perfectly see a GP where the drivers are released at 15 sec. intervals and race against the clock. Like the motorcycle TT is, or the Targa Florio was.
     
  10. Beau365

    Beau365 Formula 3

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,284
    Location:
    Congested London
    Full Name:
    Beau
    Disparity between engines should be welcomed. V8 vs V10 has produced close F1 battles in the past.

    Things like DRS are nothing more than a gimmick
     
  11. lorenzobandini

    lorenzobandini F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2016
    Messages:
    3,831
    Location:
    Champion Porsche/Audi territory
    Sheeessshhh!!! Again, wonders never cease! 'Agreement, once again. :p :)
     
  12. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    27,888
    Engine disparity should go a lot further than V8 vs V10 in my opinion.
    Any type of engine should be allowed, and some equivalency found.

    DRS is a necessary evil; it's the antidote of aero.
    Without DRS, there would be even less overtaking.
     
  13. Beau365

    Beau365 Formula 3

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,284
    Location:
    Congested London
    Full Name:
    Beau
    An "AutoPass" button is not overtaking.

    Hopefully Ross Brawn will sort out such nonsense by decreasing aero.
     
  14. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    27,888


    I know, I know, but without DRS, there would be even less passing on the track.

    Everything would be down to pit strategy; that's not racing.

    Decreasing aero will be difficult, IMO.
     
  15. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Messages:
    43,029
    Location:
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    +1

    The only passes people actually remember in the DRS era, are the ones made without use of DRS.
     
  16. 4rePhill

    4rePhill F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2009
    Messages:
    8,270
    Location:
    Worcester, England
    Full Name:
    Phill J
    The mandatory tyre changes were brought in because every fan and his/her dog were complaining about watching processional races every race weekend, where, once the cars had completed the first lap, all of the drivers simply held station and finished in that order.

    (That's a slight oversimplification, but the basics are correct!)

    So basically you'd be happy to watch a race that is basically just old style F1 qualifying? :confused:
     
  17. Beau365

    Beau365 Formula 3

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,284
    Location:
    Congested London
    Full Name:
    Beau
    +33
     
  18. TifosiUSA

    TifosiUSA F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2007
    Messages:
    8,468
    Location:
    Kansas City, MO
    Full Name:
    DJ
    I'm sure everyone thought that during the first turbo era then POOF they were gone
     
  19. TifosiUSA

    TifosiUSA F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2007
    Messages:
    8,468
    Location:
    Kansas City, MO
    Full Name:
    DJ
    The collapse of LMP1 has shown that manufacturers don't have the stomach for these ridiculously complex and expensive hybrid systems long term.

    Drop in a fuel flow restricted V10 with the best lean combustion/spark technology and a basic KERS system. These engines would be simple, sound awesome, make great power and could still be branded as green. Run it on biofuels for all I care

    Winner winner
     
  20. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    27,888


    I went to watch the Targa Florio in Sicily in the 60s, and it was a race against the clock.

    I have been at the TT a few time in my youth, and it is also a race against the clock.

    Both provided a lot of excitement and drew crowds, and there was no wheel-to-wheel racing.

    Rallyes are against the clock and attract millions of people worldwide.

    So yes, I wouldn't mind if GPs adopted that format.
     

Share This Page