Is it time for gun control in Washington?

I'm starting to see why it's probably a good idea for guns to be outlawed in Australia. If you guys get this worked up over a simple misunderstanding of Australian vernacular...

 

You hit the nail on the head quite a few posts back when you said ‘Australians are pretty damn smart’.
Correct. We are.
Smart enough to be laughing right into your presumably fat face.
Now, go and find a job, and stop annoying the adults here. That way you can afford to buy more guns and show them all off to us........as we drive past in our Ferraris.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Yeah well I'm sticking to my guns....lingo you understand...So once again FO and go and get a life you POS troll........

 

So, because you disagree with the conclusions behavioral psychologists have made concerning why people don't act, I must be making things up... Sure, why not.

 

Does anyone in Australia engage in a discussion without throwing insults, or is this the norm there?

 

Yep. It’s the norm here. Get used to it tubby.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Actually, you did disagree, you called "my theory" "absurd." Of course, it wasn't my theory (as the article posted demonstrates), but...

 

"Tubby" that's funny--and about as mature...

 

He's just a troll PP.......

 

You might be open minded, but the only "supposition" I used was in divining how they knew what the fire victims were thinking... before I realized, what the were thinking wasn't at all a part of the equation. What isn't "supposition" is the research that has gone into answering the question, "why do many people freeze up in panic situations?"

I'll give you credit for one thing, you're good at the art of equivocation.

 

Don't you find it odd that I am the only one who hasn't gone off calling anyone names or impugning anyone's character? Don't you find it odd that I'm the only one willing to explain what I meant, or how I came about my information? Or how about the fact that I'm the only one to have apologized when I misunderstood something? Yet I'm the one you and your buddies here keep slinging insults at...

 

Except, you haven't actually pointed out a fact... your only argument thus far has been little more than argument from incredulity.

 

That says a lot about you. I'm sorry to hear it.

 

Yawnnnnnn.......

 

Passive-agressive argumentum ad hominem. Why is that necessary?

Here's a fact, arrived at through the use of deductive reasoning.

Men (that means everyone) have the unalienable right to the tools of self defense.

Men have the unalienable right to life and liberty.

If a man has the unalienable right to life and liberty, then logic dictates that he also has the right to defend his life and liberty from those who would take them without due process (e.g. the state when he is convicted of committing a crime).

And, if a man has the unalienable right to defend his life and liberty from those who would take them without due process, logic dictates that he must also have the right to the tools necessary for said defense.

 

diversion.