My (Bob) Norwood Experience | Page 4 | FerrariChat

My (Bob) Norwood Experience

Discussion in 'Ferrari Discussion (not model specific)' started by Russ Gould, May 23, 2018.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. ATSAaron

    ATSAaron Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 1, 2004
    1,135
    Shady Shores, TX
    Full Name:
    Aaron Bunch
    My reply to chapter two:

    The invoice so far seems pretty transparent. I certainly would have asked for an explanation or at least more detail about the 9 hours to print a parts manual though. Maybe you did? Was there further explanation? I'm guessing this is really 9 hours to find used 355 parts. That would make more sense. He didn't charge for toner/ink? Lol

    Also are you suing the seller? Your email makes it sound like you are.

    There is a shop in California that has done this swap before, and the seller made it sound like the car was already at that shop, why didn't you go with that shop?
     
  2. thorn

    thorn F1 Rookie
    Silver Subscribed

    Aug 7, 2012
    3,324
    Tallahassee, FL
    I did find it curious that Bob listed "print 85 page parts manual" twice. Like - dude, why did you keep printing it?

    Also, "SHAUN: Search for brake cable, .05 hrs". So... someone misplaced it, and I'm being charged for them to find it?

    I know that seems nit-pick, but if you choose to line-item every single action, then all those line-items are going to get scrutinized.
     
  3. ATSAaron

    ATSAaron Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 1, 2004
    1,135
    Shady Shores, TX
    Full Name:
    Aaron Bunch
    seems like Bob should charge $125/hr and be less specific. Lol
     
  4. Dr Tommy Cosgrove

    Dr Tommy Cosgrove Three Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    May 4, 2001
    36,282
    Birmingham, AL
    Full Name:
    Tommy
    Is Bob reading this?
     
    RennSport93 and Rogelio Garcia like this.
  5. dm_n_stuff

    dm_n_stuff Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    some deep recess of my memory tells me one of his guys posted here in a thread, it got out of hand, and he got banned. I don't recall particulars. As to Bob? Don't know if he's here. Of course you don't have to join to read.

    D
     
  6. ATSAaron

    ATSAaron Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 1, 2004
    1,135
    Shady Shores, TX
    Full Name:
    Aaron Bunch
    We have not seen an invoice for it, so I guess not. LOL.
     
    nickmb, Jakuzzi, desmomini and 11 others like this.
  7. dm_n_stuff

    dm_n_stuff Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    That was the answer I was searching for.

    D
     
    daytona355 likes this.
  8. daytona355

    daytona355 F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Mar 25, 2009
    12,655
    London
    Full Name:
    Sid Korshak
    Well, tell you what, come take my car for servicing, stick me with a bill and have me pay it, then try to hold my car hostage until I give you even ten cents extra and have to sign a liability release...... see how it works out. When you’d finished your treatment at a hospital courtesy of a little Albanian team I know, you’d be back to offer your sincere apologies.

    I’m sorry, but Norwood is being a complete crook in this story, regardless of chapter 2, 10 or 50. Car back to its owner as the bills are paid in full, liability for works done and invoiced intact. That’s how business works
     
  9. ATSAaron

    ATSAaron Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 1, 2004
    1,135
    Shady Shores, TX
    Full Name:
    Aaron Bunch
    I guess you haven't read enough of the story to know that the bill isn't paid. Nor have you read enough to realize this isn't service work. This is one off bespoke fabrication work that is impossible to accurately estimate.

    Bob isn't holding the car asking for some random sum, he wants to be paid for the work that 1) he fells Russ authorized and 2) has already been done to the car. The details of which we are still waiting to read.

    Aaron
     
  10. daytona355

    daytona355 F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Mar 25, 2009
    12,655
    London
    Full Name:
    Sid Korshak
    Russ had a cashiers cheque for him to settle the bill, bobs fault he didn’t take it..... try again, captain Norwood :)
     
  11. the_stig

    the_stig F1 Rookie

    Sep 19, 2005
    3,497
    Yes - the infamous Big Red - the crazy little man who took well-aimed shots at his own feet and the good ship SS Norwood with each and every post he made here. By the time he was finished he had done way more damage to Norwood's reputation than the OP in that thread could ever have hoped for.
     
  12. the_stig

    the_stig F1 Rookie

    Sep 19, 2005
    3,497
    Pretty selective for someone so critical of other people's reading skills. You conveniently left out the part about the car being removed to an undisclosed location and the release form he is supposed to have insisted on. Service work or custom work the state isn't going to care. Mechanic's liens exist to protect the shop but they don't give the shop owner carte blanche to hide the customer's property, deny him access to it, and they certainly don't allow extortion which is what Norwood's actions amount to.

    I've got this picture in my head of the once highly respected Bob Norwood turned into this Howard Hughes figure, living as a crazy recluse and clearly having lost the plot completely.
     
  13. ATSAaron

    ATSAaron Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 1, 2004
    1,135
    Shady Shores, TX
    Full Name:
    Aaron Bunch
    I just left Bob's. (I was there to pick up a Motec ecu, and to discuss buying a car, but I had to ask about Russ) There is so much more to this story. I'll let Russ tell his version but the short version is that if Russ had a legal leg to stand on he would already be in court. But he doesn't so instead he is telling his version of events to to smear Bob's name.

    Aaron
     
  14. Russ Gould

    Russ Gould Formula 3

    Nov 8, 2004
    1,073
    For a guy that just saw the car twice sometime last year before it was done, Aaron is doing a great job of representing Norwood's current frame of mind. Read into that what you will.

    The reason I decided to use Norwood for the project, apart from the fact that I am in Texas, is that he is the world's largest manufacturer of 288s after Ferrari. I don't know how many he has done but my guess is it's double digits by now. Plus his estimates seemed reasonable at the time. Frankly, I now wish I had used Carl in California, he seemed to know exactly how to do the job, which is why, when Norwood threw his hands up, I told him to call Carl.

    Regarding the invoices, in Norwood's mind he is owed more money. In my mind, I have held up my side of the contract. How can that be? All in good time. Suffice it to say that yes, I have questioned a lot of the more dubious stuff in the invoices in writing and received no specific answers. I think a neutral party might conclude, after the car, the invoices, and the correspondence are examined, that I have already overpaid Norwood. But what is not controversial at all is the fact that when I attempted to pay Norwood exactly what he demands, he declined my cashier's check and added a new demand that I sign a release. All before seeing the car! Reminds me of Nancy Pelosi: "Pass the bill so you can see what's in it". How did that work out?

    Regarding the mystery location and the legal releases, one can only speculate as to what is behind that. It could be as simple (as Norwood stated) "I need the parking". It could be that the car is parked in his barn and that the parking/storage fee story is a hoax. But if the work was all so great and fully authorized, then why deny the customer access to the vehicle? Does he think I am going to jump in and drive off (not possible apparently as it doesn't start, idle or run). Not allowing me access to the car tells me there is more going on. When you combine that with "sign here", I can only conclude that there is something very wrong with the car and/or the work and that Norwood knows he is likely to be sued when all is revealed. Maybe the motor won't run because the right bank is shot and Norwood went ahead and installed the motor knowing that, against my instructions. He took other risks/shortcuts which are consistent with that theory, for example welding in the subframe mounts and installing the subframe and motor before he had the rear suspension parts. And his story as to why it's not running right changes from week to week. Perhaps the doors will now not latch because the chassis is flexing, or maybe he tweaked the chassis to deal with the alignment issues, or maybe the welds are failing? Perhaps the rats have eaten my wiring? I know he had rat problems with his Lexus. Or perhaps he crashed it (the brakes, which Norwood replaced entirely, don't work, we know that much). For all I know, it's burned (would not be the first one as Aaron has posted). Why is he hiding the car? That's one of the big questions. Does he really think I am going to pay him in cash and sign away all my rights without inspecting the car and the work?

    His attempt to avoid being sued is ironic because his actions so far are going to land him in court anyway, and he already qualifies him for triple damages under the CPA in Texas. He had one chance to settle this without a lawsuit, and he declined that option. There's a certain irrationality to the whole situation.
     
    Lusso123 and daytona355 like this.
  15. the_stig

    the_stig F1 Rookie

    Sep 19, 2005
    3,497
    If only 3 things out of everything Russ has said are true then I honestly don't care about any of Norwood's side of it as nothing excuses preventing a client from seeing his own property, extorting a signed release intended to deny basic legal rights, and removing his property from the place of business.
    PS: not up to you to "let Russ tell his side of the story". Probably best if you take the advice already offered and stop defending Norwood at the possible expense of your own credibility.
     
    Lusso123, daytona355 and 19633500GT like this.
  16. Russ Gould

    Russ Gould Formula 3

    Nov 8, 2004
    1,073
    If I don't have a legal leg to stand on, then why is Bob demanding a full legal release? Like I said, there is an element of irrationality here.

    The two things are not mutually exclusive. I have to document the whole saga for the lawyer anyway.
     
    Lusso123 and daytona355 like this.
  17. the_stig

    the_stig F1 Rookie

    Sep 19, 2005
    3,497
    Anyone else bothered by the fact that Norwood apparently has no problem talking about clients and their business with other clients?
     
  18. paulyp

    paulyp Karting

    Dec 11, 2011
    91
    Dallas
    Spellcheck would have been an extra charge.
     
  19. the_stig

    the_stig F1 Rookie

    Sep 19, 2005
    3,497
    I am horrified to see that several online dictionary sites list milage as an "alternative spelling of mileage". As in, what, I reject your spelling and substitute whatever the hell I feel like?
     
    tritone and daytona355 like this.
  20. daytona355

    daytona355 F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Mar 25, 2009
    12,655
    London
    Full Name:
    Sid Korshak
    Oh, well that’s alright then... you sound so knowledgable and have convinced me. Next time I get the car serviced I’ll be sure to expect extortion as luxury extra...... for ****s sake. Do you read what you write before you press the button?
     
  21. daytona355

    daytona355 F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Mar 25, 2009
    12,655
    London
    Full Name:
    Sid Korshak
    Exactly..... Aaron is such a trusted confidant though, he knows the Russ situation intensely, as remember, he confirmed himself that he visits bob probably as many as two times a year! Hehehehehe........ according to this thread though, hasn’t he been there twice this week now? I reckon he might be the driver of the sandwich van that turns up at bobs unit daily..... :)

    Hope he bills bob individually for each scrape of the knife with the butter, every slice individually of meat and cheese, and for wrapping the sandwich, and bagging!
     
  22. Aircon

    Aircon Ten Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Jun 23, 2003
    100,524
    Melbourne, Australia
    Full Name:
    Peter
    I agree with that. Disgraceful.
     
  23. ///Mike

    ///Mike F1 Veteran

    Dec 11, 2003
    6,097
    Bugtussle
    Apparently students can now pass math classes by getting "close enough" to the right answer, so I guess it follows that spelling would suffer the same fate 2+2=3 and mileage=milage, U=you, then=than, ad nauseum.

    ///Mike
    (watching Rome burn)
     
    tritone likes this.
  24. Smiles

    Smiles F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Nov 20, 2003
    16,673
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Full Name:
    Matt F
    Sue him or don’t. I doubt you’ll get much satisfaction here. I also doubt that you’d win in the courtroom.

    His explanation for moving your car for the needs of parking space is completely acceptable. He could have a mechanic’s lien against your car that does far worse with you knowing where the car is, and still not being able to use it.

    You could also do a far better job in being terse and accurate. As in something like:
    I asked Bob to complete A job. He gave me B quote. I offered C money (or B if you’re honest), but Bob demanded D money.

    Quite frankly, I’d fire you as a customer.

    Matt
     
    billswim and ATSAaron like this.
  25. the_stig

    the_stig F1 Rookie

    Sep 19, 2005
    3,497
    Wow. That was pretty uncalled for.
     
    daytona355 and AshAP like this.

Share This Page