Christian, sorry, but you need to respect the copyright of most of the images you posted here. I think -some- of the copyright-holders are not amused that you post their photos and -I think- without their permission.
Your absolutely right, next time I will post pictures with a signature like M Cahier did. In the other way, many people do that, moderators or admirators like me. So are you going to put a penalty to everyone? ... I know someone need the copyright for the recuperation of these pictures, but I m not doing reports or others treatment behind. In clear: No business. Regards
You may have a look at this website. https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/de/web/observatory/faqs-on-copyright-pl#4 Kind regards Manfred
Nobody blamed you doing business with these images. But you don`t own the copyright, its that simple! If -for example- Marcel posted a photo here he clearly mentioned either the copyright holder or "internet" or "not my photo" etc.! Almost all of the other members doing the same. Not many members here posted so many photos as you did in the past....without given ANY copyright. I understad your admiration - but this does not give you the right to ignore credits.
You must to do a song Werner , I like Mp4. No seriously, I give you a reply in my last post. For me the problem is solved. Regards
Perhaps you can consider the problem solved, but it seems you don't care respecting copyrights of others since you continue posting pictures that may not have be taken by you, you may not have a permission to post and/or without acknowledging who's pictures they are or how and where did you get them. It’s not necessarily only about money or getting paid for the use of ones pictures or subjects they may contain. It’s also about respect for the photographer, image commissioner or owner and subject matter(s) they contain, etc... OTOH, if someone is able to spend their days on the internet browsing, copying & pasting photographs, perhaps they could spend some of that time ensuring/researching they don't infringe on copyrights of others or maybe they should just take their own photos and post only those.
We're going to have to stop this stupid game, guys. Massini who tracks my posts, places his little seed and then sees his team intervene in his paper shift. It Becomes tiring, Want to say... ridiculous.
Photo by Jerry Melton - July 1969 Waterford Hills Michigan. 0224/AT Please respect copyright. Image Unavailable, Please Login
I agree. All any one playing “stupid games” (or jokes) have to do is stop their ridiculous and tiring disregard to privacy, respect and rights of others. Problem solved, correct ?
0224AT at Virginia City hillclimb, 1972, when owned (I think) by my friend Dean Bachelor. Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
When I was much younger I thought the Mex was one of the ugliest Ferrairs ever, now I think it is the most adorable ever. What really changed? john
Like me: your eyesight. LOL just joking. It is oddly attractive in its ugly duckling way: hard to understand but so it is....I can recall as a kid how Bachelor's writings had me in awe of the car and the event it was specifically created for...
My favorite photo of these AT cars is a period B/W shot of some shipping dock where one is suspended. john
I first saw photos of these Vignale Mexicos in the Autocar Magazine's coverage of the Carrera Panamericana when I was in law school two-thirds of a century ago; though I was utterly enamored with Ferrari I found this design unappealing then and still do.
