328 running hot at low speed | Page 3 | FerrariChat

328 running hot at low speed

Discussion in '308/328' started by dinonz308, Oct 17, 2019.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. dinonz308

    dinonz308 Formula Junior

    Nov 26, 2017
    868
    Full Name:
    Dean
    I bled the system (cold, as instructed) and what I consider a lot of air came out of the radiator - at a guess I would say it was air for 30 seconds before I got fluid. Thermostat housing didn't result in anything, because I was able to remove the screw completely and fumble around taking ages to get the new EZBleed screw back in (I already had one - will consider the auto-bleed valve later). Took the car for a short drive to warm up, and then watched - the cooling system behaved as expected - fans came on and off, and kept the temps level. Took the car for a longer drive later to meet a friend for lunch, and it was all in normal operating range - around 75C during cruise, warming while stationary, and cooling once moving.

    Will keep monitoring but seems it was a lot of air in the system. Might just do a cold bleed on the radiator every week or so to see if it's an ongoing issue or just a one off anomaly somehow.
     
    DGS and thorn like this.
  2. kcabpilot

    kcabpilot Formula 3

    Apr 17, 2014
    1,614
    California SF bay area
    Full Name:
    Paul
    Keep an eye on it. I went through this whole scenario a little over a year ago, same symptoms but got progressively worse as time went on. I started with new radiator cap, new hoses, new radiator, new water pump, easy bleeders and auto bleeders but in the end it was head gasket.

    While going through all this I must have read every thread ever written about it going back probably ten years and I learned a lot about the cooling system of the 308. The 328 has a number of improvements but basically is the same. I’ll have to warn you there is a lot of misinformation out there and one of them is the “sucking air in” myth. I never could get that figured out because as the coolant cools and the volume decreases it can’t suck anything in since the fluid in the expansion tank is higher than the rest of the system so if air gets pulled in through the overflow it just stays there at the top of the tank.

    As I said before I’m not claiming you have a blown head gasket but here’s a simple test that will give you a quick answer. Remove the cap from the expansion tank (when cold) start the engine and look in there with a flashlight. Do you see a steady stream of coolant flowing in from the upper bleed hose or do you see a constant stream of air bubbles? If you see bubbles, you’ve got a problem.

    Also, forget the auto-bleeders, they don’t work. Ask me how I know....
     
    Saabguy and mike996 like this.
  3. mike996

    mike996 F1 Veteran

    Jun 14, 2008
    6,912
    Full Name:
    Mike 996
    ONE thing I have to admit I've wondered about occasionally, especially with all the posts about this subject is: It is possible for the water pump or other system characteristics to cause cavitation and actually "make" air in the system. DD two strokes required a specific coolant package to prevent "micro-cavitation" and its subsequent reduction in cooling. Seems unlikely here since that didn't happen when these cars were new, so if air keeps showing up in the system. it's because something is...as they say in scientific circles... broken. ;)

    But cavitation can be caused by changes in the system over time - like corrosion in engine water system passages, radiators, etc. So MAYBE there is something to the claims that air really is "generated" in some of these cars as they age due to system changes caused by cavitation, which, MIGHT be caused by insufficient coolant additives over time. ???

    NOTE: This is just "thinking out loud" on my part...:oops:
     
  4. johnk...

    johnk... F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jun 11, 2004
    11,278
    CT
    Full Name:
    John Kreskovsky

    Cavitation does not generate air. It creates coolant vapor which will condense back to liquid when the coolant temperature drops or when the local pressure in the coolant rises above the vapor pressure. Vapor pressure is temperature dependent. Liquids boil at the temperature where the vapor pressure is equal to the local pressure. The local pressure in a cooling system varies due to changes in the velocity of the coolant through small passages, etc, thus lowering the pressure and causing cavitation. Micro bubbles can form on surfaces as a result. This bubbles don't necessarily get swept away by the liquid coolant and can result hot spots because they reduce heat transfer which, over time, can damage liners. I have heard reports of damaged liners from cavitation but I have never met anyone who actually suffered such a fate.
     
    thorn likes this.
  5. mike996

    mike996 F1 Veteran

    Jun 14, 2008
    6,912
    Full Name:
    Mike 996
    Thanks John! I didn't know that cavitation "bubbles" were vapor which condenses back to liquid. Clearly this debunks my speculation re the possibility of air being "generated" and we go back to the scenario that "if there's air in the system that needs regular bleeding, something's broke" :)
     
  6. dinonz308

    dinonz308 Formula Junior

    Nov 26, 2017
    868
    Full Name:
    Dean
    Thanks - I'll try your simple test to be sure, and I will be keeping a close eye on it.
     
  7. dinonz308

    dinonz308 Formula Junior

    Nov 26, 2017
    868
    Full Name:
    Dean
    I agree on the possibility of cavitation causing air-bubbles. It didn't happen when new, but when new it didn't have 21st century anti-freeze in it. Not blaming the anti-freeze, just saying that like oil and gas technology what we have now is not the same as what they had then, and could behave differently.
     
  8. dinonz308

    dinonz308 Formula Junior

    Nov 26, 2017
    868
    Full Name:
    Dean
    Ah - thanks for clarifying. My experience with cavitation is more from the damage side having seen first hand the damage water can do to a hydro-electric turbine in a power station. Slight difference in scale too.
     
  9. thorn

    thorn F1 Rookie
    Silver Subscribed

    Aug 7, 2012
    3,324
    Tallahassee, FL
    I don't think the formula is a factor; AFAIK, green Prestone is pretty much the same now as 1985, give or a take a minute percentage of additive.
     
  10. johnk...

    johnk... F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jun 11, 2004
    11,278
    CT
    Full Name:
    John Kreskovsky

    It's all basically the same, pumps, turbines, boat propellers.... If the fluid pressure drops below the vapor pressure at some point in the flow path, vapor bubbles are generated. As you note, they can cause significant damage in different ways. In turbines and pumps it's primarily by erosion. (Like you, years ago I was involved in design of turbines and pumps associated with power generation.) In IC engines it primarily a problem with engines with wet liners (AKA Ferraris, etc) where it effects heat transfer in addition to errosion.

    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  11. Freddie328

    Freddie328 Formula Junior

    Jul 29, 2013
    393
    Herts, UK
    Full Name:
    Richard
    There's a 0.9 bar and 1.1 bar pressure cap available for these. Was the cap replaced like for like?
     
  12. Nuno Andrade

    Nuno Andrade Karting

    Aug 24, 2019
    154
    Houston
    Full Name:
    Nuno Andrade
    Not sure if this was addressed already, but do you have the foam barriers installed? (I have a 308 , not sure if the design on the 328 is the same, but the foam barriers forces the air to move thru the louvers instead of getting "stuck" on the spare tire compartment)
     
  13. mike996

    mike996 F1 Veteran

    Jun 14, 2008
    6,912
    Full Name:
    Mike 996
    As far as rad caps, rather than fooling around, in the US I suggest buying the cap Ricambi sells. Yeah, it cost more than going to Pep Boys and buying a rad cap for 6-8 bucks but from Ricambi you'll get the functionally correct cap, not one that just happens to fit but doesn't work correctly in the application. Nothing wrong with the Pep Boys cap per se, but it's the wrong design for an expansion tank; it's fine for a radiator with an overflow tank but that's not what we have. ;)
     
  14. johnk...

    johnk... F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jun 11, 2004
    11,278
    CT
    Full Name:
    John Kreskovsky
    Have to disagree, Mike. Just take the old cap to any auto parts store and ask for a similar one with 1.1 bar rating and you're good to go. The only thing you need to check is the depth. NAPA 703-1698 works just fine. It's the same construction/design as the OEM cap. This radiator cap crap is way over analyzed.
     
  15. mike996

    mike996 F1 Veteran

    Jun 14, 2008
    6,912
    Full Name:
    Mike 996
    Good point! I'm sure you can find a correct cap but, from my own experience, selecting a cap by saying you want a cap for a 328 Ferrari or using the list they have at the parts store for cars/rad caps, got me the wrong cap for the car. Only issue with taking your current cap and matching is that it assumes the current cap on the car IS the proper type of cap. As long as you know it's the proper cap, I agree you can match it.

    But it is important to have the cap with the proper return vent design (spring loaded shut). The most common type of cap is wrong for the application. Using it, the cooling system won't pressurize properly (if at all) and, as a result, it will regularly spit coolant overboard, eventually causing the coolant level to be low enough to create a problem.
     
  16. dinonz308

    dinonz308 Formula Junior

    Nov 26, 2017
    868
    Full Name:
    Dean
    I have what was put on by you know who, and it's a Stant 10231.
     
  17. johnk...

    johnk... F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jun 11, 2004
    11,278
    CT
    Full Name:
    John Kreskovsky

    I guess that's an advantage of being an original owner. ;) I was able to take the OEM cap with me. The problem was two fold though. The OEM cap was cracked, thus leaked and would not hold pressure anymore. But it was also a 13 0.9 bar cap. So I replaced it with a 0.9 bar cap which would still, on occasion, allow some coolant to piss out. Changed to the 1.1 bar and that solved the problem. The NAPA 703-1698 would appear to be identical to the Stant 10231. Both are vented 16 psi caps and apparently have the correct depth for the Ferrari expansion tank.

    I think what you are referring to are the caps with the little thing that dangles and requires the coolant to expand and push it closed. Yes, they won't work on our cars. We need the Type A cap, not Type B. :eek: It's a jungle out there.

    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  18. mike996

    mike996 F1 Veteran

    Jun 14, 2008
    6,912
    Full Name:
    Mike 996
    Too Funny! That Stant cap per internet cross reference "Is not suitable for your 1989 Ferrari 328 GTS"

    I'm Not saying it's the wrong cap, undoubtedly if he who must not be named uses it, it's right. Just pointing out NOT to trust general application information.
     
  19. DGS

    DGS Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    May 27, 2003
    73,061
    MidTN
    Full Name:
    DGS
    The only way to suck air through the expansion tank is if you let the coolant level get too low and the tank is empty.
    But my 328 did have a habit of sucking air through an improperly sealed radiator bleed screw, until I replaced it.
    A gap in the system anywhere can cause both coolant to leak out (running) and air to enter (on cool down).

    I like to cold bleed my cooling system by putting a few psi of pressure on top of the reservoir tank with a hand pump, to both facilitate the bleed and to confirm that the system holds pressure.
    Of course, without a specialty cap with air hose, putting pressure over the tank involves layers of plastic and a boatload of rubber bands -- a real Rube Goldberg kludge. ;)

    But I've found that doing a pressure bleed on my 328 (with the heater cores open) makes for a "one and done" bleed.
    FWIW
     
  20. johnk...

    johnk... F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jun 11, 2004
    11,278
    CT
    Full Name:
    John Kreskovsky
  21. dinonz308

    dinonz308 Formula Junior

    Nov 26, 2017
    868
    Full Name:
    Dean
    I'll look at getting one. Right now I'm waiting for my block test kit - I did see some fluid flow in the expansion tank when cold, but could not tell if it was upper hose or not. Figured I'd just buy the test kit and test it to be sure.
     
  22. thorn

    thorn F1 Rookie
    Silver Subscribed

    Aug 7, 2012
    3,324
    Tallahassee, FL
    Don't pressure test over 10-12 lbs.... More than that and you might cause leaks.
     
  23. kcabpilot

    kcabpilot Formula 3

    Apr 17, 2014
    1,614
    California SF bay area
    Full Name:
    Paul
    To clarify: coolant flowing into the expansion tank from the upper bleed hose is completely normal. What you don’t want to see are air bubbles in that flow.

    I’ll also warn you that the block test kit is inconclusive unless you have very badly blown head gasket and you can somehow get a test on the system when it’s hot. Not sure how you would do that because it’s impossible to remove the cap when it’s under pressure. I did indeed have a failed gasket that was leaking at the #4 cylinder but I was never able to get a positive result from the block test, which I had to perform after it had cooled enough to open the system, it always showed negative and the fluid stayed blue.
     
    ferrariowner likes this.
  24. dinonz308

    dinonz308 Formula Junior

    Nov 26, 2017
    868
    Full Name:
    Dean
    Thanks - that's good to know!
     
  25. kcabpilot

    kcabpilot Formula 3

    Apr 17, 2014
    1,614
    California SF bay area
    Full Name:
    Paul
    Here are two short videos I took last year. The first shows the air bubbles in the stream and the second shows how I located the source at #4 cylinder when doing leak down checks.



     
    ferrariowner likes this.

Share This Page