I can't wait to see the car's performance. But I was honestly hoping for a little bit faster car than the official numbers though. 0-60 and 0-124 times are little slower for a 1000 hp awd hybrid. 918 Spyder does 0-60 in 2.2 seconds. But let's wait and see.
"official" 0-62mph is on paper, actual performance are facts...even a 911 turboS hit 0-62mph below 2.5s due to the awd....and yes, considering those numbers, the "on paper" performance of the sf90 stradale are not so impressive, bot acceleration and top speed I mean... Apart from that, the 0-186mph is not even declared, and this give something to think...
First of all, you are confusing 0-60 with 0-62 mph. Secondly, you are comparing factory claims about 0-62 mph, with what american magazines achieved at the 0-60 mph dash with a 1 ft roll out. R&T achieved 2.4'' in a LaFerrari at the 0-60 sprint, whereas the 918 they tested did it in 2.5''. At higher speeds the LF was condiserably quicker than the Porsche and will also annihilate an SF90 Stradale. What makes you think that the 918 will be quicker than the Stradale though? Not to mention that you are comparing a much more expensive hypercar (918) to a series production supercar (Stradale). Regarding your last question, Ferrari doesn't announce the Stradale's 0-300 kph time, because it will be a lot slower than LaFerrari's... which won't be great for their marketing department.
That humbled marketing department isn't feeling any heat as the clients have all signed up for their SF90 with only some familiarity gained from the show floor or the design studio.
if it were one of some British Carmakers, then the news headline would have " _ _ _ _ _ _ finished _ _ _ _ mile European road trip"...
Well the car's faster than the LaF. 0.7 seconds faster at Fiorano. And the 0-300 should also be faster. Why wouldn't they make a 2020 car faster than a 7 year old ancient hypercar? Also the 0-300 time of a LaF was never proven.
Above 210 kph the Stradale has "only" about 840 horses (the front motors disengage), while being considerably heavier than the LaFerrari. That's the reason that Ferrari doesn't announce its 0-300 kph time. The LF's time has been proven time and again. I am willing to bet that on new generation tyres, the LF will be quicker around a track too.
Where does it say the front motors disengage? Also I can't find anything that shows LaF doing 15 second 0-300 kmph. Can you link me up with the sources if you have any?
It seems that you don't know a lot about Ferraris. You are on fchat, sir. Get your facts straight. It is a fact that the front motors disengage after 210 kph. Also I have seen a LF doind 0-300 kph at about 15''. Magazine tests don;t reach that high, but when a car a does 0-150 mph in 9.8'' (as measured by R&T) it makes sense that it also does 0-186 in about 15''.
First of all I write 62, not 60 . And, where I've said that the 918 will be quicker than sf90 stradale? I've said, that considering all the numers and the efforts, so, AWD, 780hp from a turbo engine combined with all the "electric stuff" to hit 1000hp, AND (!) basically the torque of a a locomotive, the claimed 0-62/0-124mph are not so impressive, and I confirm that: it's just a few tenths better than a 720hp RWD 488 Pista .. If they wanted to make a new top of the line hybrid-supercar they had to and could (!) do more than that... My Two Cents It was not a question, but a rhetorical reflection... And you confirmed exactly what I already knew...
the rear electric-engine only have 204hp/150kw... The car have a total of "only" 220hp electric power when all three electric engine are combined together but is an "algebraic" sum to not push the system to the limit (which could deliver more power, said by Felisa...) in order to not run out the battery...
Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Photos by: AJ AutoGraphy HD: 1. https://scontent.fath6-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/85110825_1552787754900794_1451837587592314880_o.jpg?_nc_cat=102&_nc_ohc=tEwz3hbwHU4AX9wwXuW&_nc_ht=scontent.fath6-1.fna&oh=5f2f3ca0567d3cac3460b1c42bf77fe6&oe=5ED393C5 2. https://scontent.fath6-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/84940193_1552787904900779_9111243892593786880_o.jpg?_nc_cat=109&_nc_ohc=Cmv5TvGU-HUAX9nM1kZ&_nc_ht=scontent.fath6-1.fna&oh=0f1fb975e70ba63c7a38158adb2ab02e&oe=5F00F31B 3. https://scontent.fath6-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/84926419_1552787944900775_3156743156595163136_o.jpg?_nc_cat=102&_nc_ohc=Kf_r-GvO0fYAX-wt6__&_nc_ht=scontent.fath6-1.fna&oh=a24ff0c488cc41fe098559192ba2ef54&oe=5ED46818
I'm guessing the 458 SA in the background doesn't have roof open much when there is a statue of a polar bear in the lobby.