It's not only grip that's the problem, it's the lack of visibility created by the massive spray. A skilled driver on his own can deal with a wet track, but when you are in the pack following other cars, you hit a constant wall of water. And larger tyres only amplify the problem, as they lift more water.
In "a bit of rain" yes; in heavy rain probably not. Apart from a few who will try their luck, most will adopt a "survival mode" and just circulate without trying too much.
What pissed me off was that Quali was also delayed, and by the time they finally made a go of it, there where already cars out there on inters. And that's not the first time that happened, either. The best way to help a track dry is to get fast cars to drive over it. Perhaps an idea is to hook a trailer with a HUGE V8 powered fan (a la brabham fan car) and shoot the water away from the track to do a lap. A hillbilly can build such a device for 5 grand. Got to be cheaper than another farce like this. And more than cheap enough to at least try. If it doesn't work, they pissed away 5 grand. If it does, they re-gain some credibility.
you mean like the jet dryers Indy and NASCAR have been using for 30 years? (and, in fact, built by actual hillbillies)
I've seen them used on road courses to remove standing water and get the track to a race-able condition obviously ovals and drag strips have much higher standards of dryness
F1's managing director Ross Brawn said the sport had no real flexibility over its decision due to the weather but defended half points being awarded. "It's pretty rare to see a weekend where the weather has been so intense, so consistently," Brawn said. "Every effort was made to get the race underway safely and normally, there is a window when you can bring the safety car in, but that wasn't possible. "Half points were awarded. It's not ideal but if you can't reward someone for the race, reward them for the bravery in qualifying. A lap like George Russell did in qualifying in the absence of a full race should be rewarded. As I say, it's not ideal, but it's where we are. The weather just wasn't in our corner on Sunday."
I'm not even going to comment on that ****-show and all that. What I did find funny was that Ric seems to be the only driver who thinks half points should have been awarded. What a joke! He lucked out that his teammate crashed out, Perez crashed out, and Bottas had a penalty.... and most importantly... that race was never raced. Best finish he's going to get this year. Ric getting 4th, Ham getting 3rd, Russell not being able to race after a near pole on merit, and Lando blowing his chance at a true pole and not beating Ric again are the real tragedies here.
The best part of the entire coverage was watching Mick drive his father's Jordan car. And the best part of that for me was watching Seb come to the car and give him tips on the shifting. That was a great moment and you could see the genuine emotion from Mick afterwards. I thought that was great.
Well of course Ross Brawn will justify this decision ! For me, the FIA hasn't shown any honesty or leadership in the circumstances, instead, they retreated behind obscure rules and cheated the public. They couldn't have a race (they said), but they wanted to show a race (for contractual reasons perhaps), so they called 3 neutralised laps a race ! The irony is that the points awarded after that farce may have a decisive influence in who's going to win the championship this year. Let's hope not !
If Ross feels that way about George's qualifying lap, then award points for qualifying. I think that's a bit of a disingenuous explanation by him. Most likely, George would not have held onto a top-5 position, so Ross is saying it was right to give him race points for his qualifying effort? It sounds like the decision was subjective when he puts it that way. You may want to think that one through. That sentiment changes how points are currently awarded in F1. I'm not saying George didn't drive a great lap either.
Anyone else find it amusing that the masters of the pinnacle of motor racing display so little planning and forethought into a strategy to allow for flexibility for a weather event that even small series do to ensure that a race could be delayed until a Monday or Tuesday. I think the FIA and the powers that be are showing the emperor may not have any clothes. F1 has been neutered for years, but the lack of contingency plan for a series that races in locations that usually have weather issues demonstrates a complete lack of professionalism.
Totally agree, It does actually show that these people are not as smart as they like to think they are but I dont think its that easy in all reality to run the race the next day, TV rights and money are the real motivators behind the decision to run a "token" race behind the safety car to appease the masses. It kind of reminded me of those two bookies (Harry Guardino) in the film "Any which way you can" when they realise they have to pay up because Clint Eastwood won the big fight with William Smith, they decided to make a run for it & lept out the window clutching a suitcase full of money. The real losers are the people who paid to watch it on pay per view TV and those that travelled to the track. Some tickets for Sunday were 555 euros each Give them there money back and grow some balls, you lost this one, i am sure it wont dent your profits that much. Spa Grand Prix official statement SPA GRAND PRIX : STATEMENT Spa Grand Prix SA expresses its deepest disappointment to the outcome of this weekend, which was supposed to be the one of reunion, the conclusion of a year of hard work during which we overcame all obstacles. It started well, the show was there, but the weather conditions were not in our control and the decision made by the race direction must be respected, as the safety of the drivers must remain the priority. We share the disappointment of our customers, who have been exemplary in the way they have suffered this incredible day, but also in the way the evacuation has been carried out,. This underlines, once again, the quality and the perfect behavior of our public of enthusiasts. We now look forward to tomorrow, to a bluer sky and we look forward to seeing you next year. Priceless! As for warning bells https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/RRA-20210720-1799.pdf Best Tony
I think postponing was no option because of the short time until the upcoming event in Zandvoort. Also, having been one of the people on site who have spent a lot of money and time to attend, and being hugely disappointed for me and especially my young son, I was very well aware when buying the tickets that weather in Spa is absolutely unpredictable and such things can happen. However, for the same reason, what what was REALLY annoying was the fact that the organizers obviously didn't have any fallback plan for that scenario. As I already posted in this forum from the track on Sunday, it was very obvious from around 3:30 pm onwards that the conditions would not change. under these circumstances I don't understand why they still tried all the time and even seemed to start discussing on how to handle the points given etc. at a time when there was no way for a normal race anymore anyway. This could all have been planned for a long time before - which would have spared F1 a lot of bad publicity, internal political discussions - and cold, wet feet for spectators...
Gives me the willies thinking about it. That guy escaped 3 almost certain ways to die. Look at the tiny space he had to get out of! Image Unavailable, Please Login