Mondial 3.2 decides not to idle | Page 2 | FerrariChat

Mondial 3.2 decides not to idle

Discussion in 'Technical Q&A' started by jelliott, Jul 28, 2021.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Steve Magnusson

    Steve Magnusson Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Jan 11, 2001
    25,147
    30°30'40" N 97°35'41" W (Texas)
    Full Name:
    Steve Magnusson
    #26 Steve Magnusson, Sep 23, 2021
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2021
    I'm pretty sure that this is the K-Jet with Lambda ECU (Bosch 0280800063) from a 1984-85 US 3.0 K-Jet with Lambda (unfortunately, the file name doesn't indicate whether US 3.0 or US 3.2):

    Image Unavailable, Please Login

    because that's the older Protection Relay (with the internal fuse) and pictures that I have that are more clearly named "US 328 1988 injection ECU" show this silver-cased injection ECU (and the Protection Relay with the external fuse):

    Image Unavailable, Please Login

    Image Unavailable, Please Login

    If you have some CIA software, maybe you could read the US 3.2 injection ECU Bosch part number in those photos ;)

    The only difference I can see from the schematics in how they work is what voltages could be "seen" by the pin connected to the idle throttle microswitch:

    On the US 3.0, would be +12V or ground

    On the US 3.2, would be ground or nothing

    Still would be super-risky to swap IMO...

    PS I'd add a warning that the spark plug wire layout is very conducive to cross-talk between the wires and causing a sensitive timing light to flash when it shouldn't -- are you measuring on a single plug wire or a coil wire?

    PPS One other point is these modern meters are very good at auto-scaling and creating a signal out of noise. Rather than measuring the duty cycle of the FV, might be better to measure the voltage coming from the Protection Relay when the trouble occurs to more positively rule the Protection Relay in or out.
     
  2. jelliott

    jelliott Karting

    Mar 8, 2010
    88
    Seattle, USA
    Full Name:
    Joe Elliott
    My understanding of the fuel distributor test is that what mattered was the behavior with the pump running—zero rise of the fuel column in the open port. While perhaps a little suspicious, I wasn't inclined to be too worried about the fuel level creeping up over the course of several minutes after everything was shut off. These systems are so dependent on pressure differences and pressure drops across various orifices that I wouldn't put too much stock on anything going on when it's shut off—so long as the accumulator holds some pressure and the injectors don't leak it out!

    But the real proof, from my perspective, is the duty cycle of the frequency valve going full rich (as if the oxygen sensor wire were shorted to ground). If I had a mechanical issue making it run rich, the system would be reacting in the opposite direction. And (to Steve's point that my meter can't necessarily be trusted not to make a signal out of noise) the fact that putting it in open-loop mode with the full throttle switch 'fixes' the issue reinforces the conclusion from my frequency valve measurements. (If it were running rich due to a mechanical issue, forcing the system open-loop would only make it worse.)
     
  3. moysiuan

    moysiuan F1 Rookie
    Silver Subscribed

    Nov 1, 2005
    3,645
    Canada
    Interesting, thank you for the insights.
     
  4. jelliott

    jelliott Karting

    Mar 8, 2010
    88
    Seattle, USA
    Full Name:
    Joe Elliott
    Yeah, I'm not about to try it with a borrowed ECU unless someone can tell me definitively that they've done this before with no ill effects.

    Thanks—we started out measuring a coil wire (and almost came to some misleading conclusions) but then switched to a single plug wire when it became apparent that the timing light would at times flash erratically and not correlate to any apparent change in the smooth running of the engine!

    Thanks also for this tip—for what it's worth I've discovered that I get a cleaner FV duty cycle measurement from pin 15 on the ECU (which is evidently there specifically for diagnostic purposes) than from the adjacent pin that's actually connected to the FV. (I have yet to actually haul the oscilloscope out to the garage to see what the difference is, but I've read that pin 15 is a clean square wave and the actual FV isn't, presumably due to inductive effects of opening and closing the valve.) I was still pretty suspicious of the protection relay, until I discovered that shorting the full-throttle switch would restore the idle and prevent the engine from dying—if my symptoms were due to the protection relay cutting out, this presumably wouldn't have had any effect. I might still have been tempted to swap it with the identical relay in my Porsche, but...

    ...the good news is that I drove the car again today, with the oxygen sensor disconnected (i.e. the other open-loop mode, wherein it cycles the FV at the nominal 50% instead of the 60% full-throttle mode), and it ran totally fine, so if the ECU is screwed up, it's not screwed up so badly that it can't still detect an open-circuit lambda circuit! (But I still need to consider the possibility that Amazon sold me a defective oxygen sensor, although it would be odd for that to temporarily cure itself by turning the car off and on again!)
     
  5. raemin

    raemin Formula 3

    Jan 16, 2007
    1,874
    Lyon (FR)
    Full Name:
    R. Emin
    Stopping the car does allow to cool the sensor which has an effect as the lambda sensor has an ideal operating temperature (300°~600°Celsius). 1/ When the sensor is below this range, the ECU does not take it into account. 2/ Maybe also that yours does not work properly when it gets on the high side? Finally on modern injection, too-rich mixture is often due to failed lambda. I would try another sensor, just in case.

    As far as the ECU is concerned, what I usually do with vintage electronic is to "reflow" the board. For the lack of a hot air reflow station, a heat gun makes it do. From then on I use silver conducting grease on the connectors and check all the grounds. As a last resort I send the unit to an audio specialist for a recap.
     
    moysiuan likes this.
  6. jelliott

    jelliott Karting

    Mar 8, 2010
    88
    Seattle, USA
    Full Name:
    Joe Elliott
    Ah, yes, I should have been more clear—I wasn't referring to stopping the car for any amount of time, in this case—just switching it off and on again (or starting it again immediately after it dies) restores normal operation for at least a couple minutes.

    I've heard of this (it's been recommended to me before re: the power seat memory module on my Porsche), but always been afraid to try it, for fear that the heat will damage some component which may have been rated for reflow soldering temps when new, but is more fragile now. The heat gun sounds especially imprecise. (I think I've also heard of people reflowing old circuit boards in their kitchen oven???)
     
  7. jelliott

    jelliott Karting

    Mar 8, 2010
    88
    Seattle, USA
    Full Name:
    Joe Elliott
    I should mention that when I referred to pin 15 here (and previously), I meant pin 17--that's what I get for trusting my memory--pin 15 is the one connected to the frequency valve, and 17 is the otherwise-vacant one that evidently carries this undocumented FV duty cycle square wave. (I say undocumented, but one of my Bosch FI books mentions it specifically in regard to several other K-Jet equipped cars; the book just doesn't refer specifically to Ferrari applications.)
     
  8. jelliott

    jelliott Karting

    Mar 8, 2010
    88
    Seattle, USA
    Full Name:
    Joe Elliott
    Did I never post the exciting conclusion of this saga? (Oops.) Replacing the oxygen sensor fixed it!
     
    moysiuan likes this.
  9. moysiuan

    moysiuan F1 Rookie
    Silver Subscribed

    Nov 1, 2005
    3,645
    Canada
    So to be clear, your original replacement O2 sensor sourced from Amazon was defective?

    That sure does make diagnosing things complicated, one presumes new parts rule out that item as the problem. The quality of replacement parts is not as good as one might expect.
     
  10. jelliott

    jelliott Karting

    Mar 8, 2010
    88
    Seattle, USA
    Full Name:
    Joe Elliott
    Yes!
    Indeed!
     
  11. spirot

    spirot F1 World Champ

    Dec 12, 2005
    14,532
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    Tom Spiro
    I was just reading this thread - and on my 308's I usually ran them open loop as the sensor and cat action was minimal at best. ... and the engine would hunt up and down with the sensor plugged in. Reading your symptoms I was going to suggest that right away. and or checking the protection relays ... that is usually the issue vs. the Kjet or plunger etc... the electrics on this car / cars of this era are not great.
     
  12. jelliott

    jelliott Karting

    Mar 8, 2010
    88
    Seattle, USA
    Full Name:
    Joe Elliott
    Yeah, if it had been the associated circuit in the ECU rather than the sensor itself, I would have just run it open loop rather than try to source a new ECU.

    But mine doesn't hunt up and down, and never has. (I'm a little surprised how many people put up with that—clean your grounds, everybody (can't repeat that enough)—and if that doesn't cure it, retrofit a 4-wire sensor from a '90s car, and ground the fourth wire in the exact same place that the ECU is grounded!)
     
  13. garybobileff

    garybobileff Formula 3
    Sponsor

    Feb 5, 2004
    1,116
    San Diego CA
    Full Name:
    Gary
    Mondial's have a very common problem, as you described. Check your fuel pressure regulators. There are : pressure line in and line out. There is also a vacuum hose that typically will drip fuel out of it when removed, which shouldn't be. Replace both units if there is fuel in the vacuum hoses.
    Gary Bobileff
     

Share This Page