Thank you. Here is another 412 that has the WUR connected like the 400i. Image Unavailable, Please Login
You'll need to be careful looking at photos of 412s as some may have been "converted" for US importation (and adopted to "quasi-Lambda" operation - at least at one time ). Your photos in this post are probably a 412 that was converted for the US as the not-connected-to-anything lower port (and the upper port being connected upstream of the throttle plate) is something that might be done if they didn't want to buy proper "with Lambda" WURs: Stock 400i/412 WUR: Upper port connected to vacuum (downstream of throttle plate) Lower port connected to atmosphere (upstream of throttle plate) Hard acceleration = lessens upper chamber vacuum = opens WUR valve more = lowers control pressure = adds enrichment "With Lambda" WUR: Upper port connected to atmosphere (upstream of throttle plate) No lower port present (the lower chamber is a sealed anechoic chamber) Atmospheric pressure drop (like going to a higher elevation) = lowers the upper chamber pressure = closes the WUR valve more = raises the control pressure = removes enrichment (as required for a lower atmospheric pressure) This type of WUR does nothing for acceleration/deceleration Cheesy way to convert a stock 400i/412 WUR to "with Lambda" operation: Upper port connected to atmosphere (upstream of throttle plate) Lower port connected to atmosphere (just left open or connected upstream of the throttle plate) In this configuration, it will also do nothing for acceleration/deceleration (which it should for "with Lambda operation"), but it will do nothing to compensate for atmospheric pressure changes Do your WURs have a lower port present, and are they connected to anything -- or are the lower ports just left open to atmosphere?
Thanks Steve for the detailed history of environmental hacks! Second 412 photo has what looks like a frequency valve next to the k-jet distributor. First one has an unknown item on top of the timing chest. So none of these engine bays do look untouched. I would revert to the stock setup, maybe a bit more work but the WUR WOT enrichment makes the k-jet much more responsive. No point in keeping such modifications considering these are not required where you live.
Thank you Steve, you have solved the mystery! My car was in Japan for a few years, so I assume it was done then. Both ports on my WUR are connected: The lower port is connected to vacuum (connected to the manifold cover - aftet the throttle plate) and the upper port is connect BEFORE the throttle plate on the bend/throttle body. But in this case the WUR is acting as if it were at WOT when at idle! Sent from my MAR-LX1M using Tapatalk
Image Unavailable, Please Login Here you see how they are connected: BLUE is connected before the throttle plate and goes to the UPPER chamber of the WUR. RED is connected after the throttle plate and goes to the LOWER chamber of the WUR. It seems they have changed the diameter of the fittings as well. Will need to figure out what hose to use.
Yes, that's totally mucked up - and wrong for either without Lambda or with Lambda . If the added Frequency Valve has been removed, you should revert back to the stock arrangement as shown in the 412 SPC: Image Unavailable, Please Login Upper WUR port connected to vacuum (downstream of throttle plate) Lower WUR port connected to atmosphere (upstream of throttle plate) Are you confirming that the rest of the system has been put back to stock? No added Frequency Valve, no added ECU , and no O2 sensor(s) in the exhaust?
There is no frequency valve and nothing else connected to the fuel system. There were o2 sensors, but there was nothing to which it could supply a signal to. I will revert everything back as it per the schematic. I assume I will need to readjust the CO screw, as now it will be far more lean. Sent from my MAR-LX1M using Tapatalk
Yes, that pretty much confirms that it once was converted to "(quasi) with Lambda" at one time -- and whoever unconverted it didn't really know what had been changed and how to undo it correctly. No question that you'll have to retweak the idle mixtures as the control pressure at idle will now be some other (more correct) value.
I am away from my car and documents, but your vaccuum amplifying valve seems also quite dodgy in terms of plumbing, this green highlighted hose could play havoc with your right bank when idling if it is connected to the lower WUR chamber. Blue one is easy to re-route properly (to top WUR vent). Image Unavailable, Please Login
Great, thank you. It seems they went to the trouble of changing the fittings that are screwed into the manifold cover and throttle tower, as they don't match the diameters. Will have to find a hose that fits or add some type of adapter.
Vacuum amplifying valve is for the transmission, that requires vacuum for the modulator (part throttle shift management)
I've switched over the hoses. Should be good now. Image Unavailable, Please Login Sent from my MAR-LX1M using Tapatalk
I've started the engine after reconnecting everything, and not much difference, it at all. I went ahead and took apart the metering head and found this, note that I replaced all of this last year. Is such deformation normal? Also, the o-ring from the slits of the barrel do not feel supple and seem a bit hard. The 35+ year old diaphragm and o-rings were in better shape. Thoughts? Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Sent from my MAR-LX1M using Tapatalk
The deformation is normal, but one of the hole did not line up just like what I experienced with mine : Yours: Image Unavailable, Please Login Mine : Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login We used two different gasket brand, same problem. Our Ferrari k-jet looks like different than the one used on German cars... Have you checked the wur pressure, as this faulty passage goes to the WUR.
After going back and forth, I have found out what the issue is: the rebuild kit I used for the metering head has failed - as I initially suspected. I will be updating my original post from last year.
OK, no progress. I now have 2 newly rebuild metering heads, and I just failed the inspection - 1198 ppm and 7.5% CO - something is off. I am beginning to suspect valve timing - perhaps the mark on the flywheel is wrong. Any ideas?
I was able to find out why I had uneven exhaust temperatures - one of the exhaust pipes was leaking, pulling in air. Now they are both even.
My cam timing was way off! Don't use the marks on the cams, they are only for initial assembly! Sent from my MAR-LX1M using Tapatalk