These are the two injector waveforms from a 5.2 355-F1. One is good, the other is bad. What is wrong with the bad one? Good cylinder: drive signal is clean and appears at regular intervals, 5V (I think) in amplitude, with flyback spikes. Image Unavailable, Please Login Bad cylinder: noisy signal, amplitude is 1.85 V, no flyback spikes, and there are missing pulses. There is another cyl like this on the same side. Image Unavailable, Please Login The lack of fly-back spikes leads me to believe that the injector is either bad, or the connector is bad such that the signal never makes it to the inductive load. The small <2V amplitude tells me 1) the drive transistor is bad, or there are bad /broken wires touching each other inside the wiring harness. The noisy voltage says broken grounds or power supply somewhere in the harness. Anyone has thoughts?
I would swap the two "bad" injectors with good ones to establish whether the two injectors are really bad or not.
I do not have an answer but WHEN you rebuild the injection harness you will be shocked at the high level of ferrari wiring. We wire wrapped better in the 1960's. Even if that's not the problem building robust wiring is a good thing.
Googling the subject, I get the impression that noid lights are simply LEDs, so I doubt you’d get any sort meaningful waveforms from them.
All injectors were tested on my bench and cleaned 2 times They all fire right from idle to full speed on the injector tester. They also all flow very close to each other from 20 lbs fuel pressure right to 60 lbs
Here is a post of cylinder 4 where you can read voltages that it should be Image Unavailable, Please Login
No not lately but I bought a spare ecu years ago from salvage for a good price when f1 ecu’s were cheap I did try it before
Have you tried simple continuity checks between the ECU and the injectors (with harness shake checks? I'm just worried that the injector-specific wiring is shorting to something unrelated. You may not find it with simple wiring checks. Someone once sent me a photo of some engine harness wiring damage (under the plastic sheath). I don't know how he found it as there was no obvious/visible external signs of damage.
The 355 injection, both 2.7 and 5.2, is sequential (separate switching channels in the ECU). Since all injectors are good, the absence of flyback spikes on the "bad" cylinder suggests either bad injector driver (switching transistor) or bad microchip channel that drives that switching transistor. It appears that the injector is switched "on" and "off" (missed occasionally) but it seems that the switching "off" (cutting the current flow) is not "sharp" (sudden) enough to produce the flyback spike. The reason why I suspect the switching transistor and not the wiring is the fact that the flyback spike is absent all the time, i.e. still absent even when the graph shows that the injector was switched on/off (the wiring conducted the injector current at the time) but no spike. If there is some resistance in the wiring (poor contact somewhere), if the current switching on/off goes through, the spike should go trough even easier as it has much higher voltage than the on/off switched basic voltage. I may be wrong with my "theory" but, in any case, I would try with another known good ECU.
All injectors share the same power (12v) from a fuse and the ECM has individual grounds controlled by mosfets aka “drivers” — basically relays on a circuit board—- each driver has a voltage suppressor or storage capacitor which either hold the “fly back voltage “ or lets it go to ground so that the high voltage doesn’t spike the control board I put notes on the screen of my laptop scope explaining. The waveform As far as the form provided earlier I do not see the injector holding the voltage do to no aka fly back or spike after ECM commands or supply’s ground I feel if the wiring is check and no short to ground on the ECM side and good 12v going to the affected injector you probably have bad drivers or voltage suppressors in the ECM Image Unavailable, Please Login Sent from my iPhone using FerrariChat
Actually, there is no fuse for the injectors on the F355. Power comes from the battery through a relay.
Yes you are right I has trying to shorten my explain of the power side of the injector because the others are working One thing I do not understand clearly the setting on the scope being use would like a better pic of that Also the hook up to the injector should be Red probe to the trigger wire from ECM and the black probe to good ground Sent from my iPhone using FerrariChat
Grant's car, and he's the one with the eye on the signals. Grant is using a 4 channel digital scope to capture those signals. I'm leaning on the bad drivers as well, but Grant needs to probe out the signals on the wires first. It is not the first time that the wiring harness is bad, right Qavion (ian)?
Well, not the first time, but the experts do seem to think the waveform points to the ECU. Was the noisy (resting) waveform explained? Is the fault identical on 2 & 3 cylinders? Did Grant change the ECU because of this problem or did this problem appear later? Either way, it’s going to get expensive or time consuming. If there was a common wiring problem on, say, cylinders 1 & 2, instead of 2 & 3, at least you'd have a chance of finding the fault in a thinner part of the loom, but with 2 & 3, there is no adjacent wiring until the harness gets very thick. Without specialist tools to identify intermittent, high resistance points (e.g. Time Domain Reflectometers), you would be very lucky to find the problem without cutting up the entire harness. Are there any more cheap ECUs available? I’m finding relatively cheap parts in Australia (but limited availability). The Aussie dollar is even lower than the Canadian dollar. What's the part number, Grant? 174846?
I did not specifically look at which wire went to which, I was consistent though from the pigtail. So wave forms should have been the same If looking at injector the right wire would have been the same on all checks because I was consistent
Well, that should eliminate the ECU (assuming the same cylinders were involved). Is there something we are overlooking in the waveform? Regarding the bad waveform, is there a signal* at the injector at all times or is it just the way the waveform has been adjusted. i.e. can you position the waveform vertically to give an arbitrary zero/start point? Is that what the "(Level)" control does? Image Unavailable, Please Login Is the vertical scale the same in the good and bad waveforms? I don't think it's an earth issue as the ECU main earth is used for all injectors.