V-12 Engine into 308 Build, over on Grassroots | Page 96 | FerrariChat

V-12 Engine into 308 Build, over on Grassroots

Discussion in '308/328' started by dave80gtsi, Jan 16, 2019.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,132
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    Going to sound crazy but.... Rod stretch? I don't recall the rods you're running.. what's the weight Delta between the pistons normally on the rods vs the ones you're running?
    I know.. Numbers numbers..

    It's an interesting problem. Either you've got the cam timing way out, can't imagine you'd be that off, or theres more going on with the thermal and structural stresses
     
  2. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,620
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    The Butcher
    I'm not sure i understand the question....the clearance I just measured in 0.045" and if i torqued the head it would probably be closed to 0.040. I had targeted 0.050", so not right but hitting at modest rpm/temp? I just don't understand why. .....
     
  3. INTMD8

    INTMD8 F1 Veteran
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Jun 10, 2007
    6,718
    Lake Villa IL
    What are the spring pressures, seat and over the nose
     
  4. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,132
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    Yeah, that's what I was getting at, the closest they come to each other lest they kiss.
    Ok, rule of thumb, I don't like getting below these values:
    Intake 0.080"
    Exhaust 0.100"
    Thermal expansion and stretch of the rods.
    0.040" that's really tight.
     
  5. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,132
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    Thinking a bit more.. wiggle and rock. The intake valve is wiggling in it's guide and the head will be obviously wiggling around, the piston is also going to have rock. Those two combined will eat away those clearances.. if/when they touch those motions are very prone to breaking the head.. As we've seen.

    Just my thoughts/guesses..
     
  6. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,776
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
    Just a touch thicker head gasket will give a bit more clearance, but you'll of course lose a bit of compression
     
  7. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,620
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    The Butcher
    Seat is about 55#, Intake nose about 185#, exhaust nose about 170#.
     
  8. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,620
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    The Butcher
    Right, a quick google and out pops .080/.100 are the recommended clearance numbers. Point. But that can't be right for every engine ever made and when I dig a little deeper and I start to find what I'd expect....smaller engines run small clearances but no real formulas I've found. Motorcycle guys (4v sport bike type builds) are more like 050/080 which is where I got my targets from....a target I missed it seems.

    My piston to head clearance is 0.035" with a 0.050" compress thickness head gasket....or it was, I shimmed the liners so its probably a touch more now? That is a pretty hard stop on the piston up at/near TDC and no evidence of contact there but that could eat up most of my valve to piston clearance.

    Thermal stuff...the block expands more than the rod so piston clearance should increase. The head heating moves the cam away from the piston. The valves heating are all that's left and is they expand more than lash that would show up as lost hp and poor hot leakdown and doing some math I see where the recommended lash numbers come from with the goal to avoid 0 bucket to cam clearance.

    Clearly something is wrong and just adding a lot more clearance would probably fix it, I just wish I understood what exactly is happening.
     

Share This Page