Car import Tariff fixed at 15% | Page 2 | FerrariChat

Car import Tariff fixed at 15%

Discussion in 'Ferrari Discussion (not model specific)' started by F2003-GA, Jul 27, 2025.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Nospinzone

    Nospinzone F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2013
    Messages:
    7,820
    Location:
    Weston, MA
    Full Name:
    Paul
    Of course, it would have been a nice photo shop job if only they added the $92K into the total! :D
     
    BuyHighSellLow and technom3 like this.
  2. F2003-GA

    F2003-GA F1 World Champ Rossa Subscribed

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2003
    Messages:
    13,411
    Location:
    Sunbelt
    Full Name:
    Bro
    Maybe not initially but later on IMO all the tariff cost will reflect in the MSRP
     
  3. jjmalez

    jjmalez F1 Veteran Silver Subscribed

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    6,828
    Location:
    Northern Illinois
    Full Name:
    Joseph

    I noticed that the tariff contribution is not included in the total suggested retail price. Or am I missing something?

    :confused:
     
  4. BuyHighSellLow

    BuyHighSellLow Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2025
    Messages:
    283
    Location:
    Alberta Canada
    you're missing that it's fake. Photoshop. funny but not real.

    The Mayor
    One other point. Dealers make more money on used sales than new cars. Tariffs will increase the price of used cars and the demand. So dealers would offset a few lost sales of new. Not good for Ferrari, but not an issue for the dealers.

    THIS is 100% true and accurate.
     
  5. paulchua

    paulchua Cat Herder Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2013
    Messages:
    16,605
    Location:
    Menlo Park, CA
    Full Name:
    Paul Chua
    Not worried about Ferrari tariffs (no sweat) — the macro pricing ripple matters way more. If only tariffs stopped at cars.
    What 0.4% (CA) is doing is basically noise. The ~50% bloc (China/India/EU/Japan/LatAm) is behind the bills—(both)—and setting market share. As a Californian, I’d love it if <0.5% called the shots, but that’s not how the world works. Or is it? Pick a paradigm. (Either work for me.)
     

Share This Page