Portofino depreciation | FerrariChat

Portofino depreciation

Discussion in 'California(Portofino)/Roma(Amalfi)' started by Jake555, Sep 5, 2025.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Jake555

    Jake555 Rookie

    Sep 5, 2025
    5
    Full Name:
    Jacob Frith
    Hi,
    New on here, been away from Ferrari ownership for about 15 years, but looking to get back in with one of the Cali/ CaliT/ Porto model family.

    I'm in the UK. There is a big difference in values from entry level for a Miley Cali (now £50k ish- surely these can't get much lower?) and entry level for a decent Porto (£110k).

    While I don't mind tying up the extra funds in a Porto, I do mind it if my £110k Porto is down to £50k in 5 years. That's a big extra hit I could do without. I think the Porto is marginally better looking than the Cali, but in real life one is unlikely to be parking one next to another, and they both look way better than the Nissan Juke or whatever one will actually be parking them next to. Dynamics wise, I've not had a quick car for a few years so either of them will feel amazing in that regard. So that's not a big concern.

    So my main question is what do people think about where the Portofino is on it's depreciation curve. Have they still got a long way to fall?

    And the Cali T? Are they still coming down do we think?

    As I say, the normally aspirated Cali can't surely have too far to drop, but maybe I'm wrong on that? It's all a guess of course but for sure there's people on this forum who are better qualified than I am to make that guess.

    So far, is the Porto doing better than than the Cali was at this stage? Adjusted for inflation was the Porto a move upmarket for Ferrari. Ie., how did the new prices adjusted for inflation compare?

    I have lots of other questions about these cars but depreciation is the big one.

    Other quezzies:
    The Cali was initially supposed to be a Maserati I gather and is frowned upon in certain Ferrari owners circles because of that. Has the Porto been tarred with the same brush, or is it more of a 'proper Ferrari' and does this have a bearing on residuals?

    Back seat room in Cali versus Porto. Any real difference (I have a son- otherwise I'd just be buying the nicest 430 (or even manual 360) I can afford because I'm much more comfortable with their likely residuals as a definitely proper mid engined Ferrari).

    Are the back seats actually usable for humans? My son is 11 but about 5'10" I'm 6'3" so he's not going to be sitting behind me. But on the passenger side with the passenger seat all the way forward, or a long way forward? I could use the situation as an excuse to get a tiny Asian girlfriend to go in the front. I like tiny Asian girlfriends anyway. Can

    Do the optional carbon race seats help increase rear legroom on these cars? They look like they are much thinner backed.

    What are the really key things to watch with buying these cars? I hear gearboxes were fragile on the first couple of years of first gen Calis, so I'll be avoiding those cars. Any others to avoid?

    What are the colours and specs that need avoiding in these cars? There's retail red of course which will always help with Ferrari resale, but I'd like to avoid that cliche. Black, white and dark grey look terrible in Calis in my opinion but are there any other colours that are unsellable. My brother had a burgundy 360, which took him a very long time to sell. Wrong red. Buyers wanted rosso corsa or a completely different colour. They didn't want 'not quite rosso corsa'.
     
  2. greyboxer

    greyboxer F1 World Champ

    Dec 8, 2004
    12,705
    South East
    Full Name:
    Jimmie
    Mods: maybe move to Cali/Porto ?

    OP: lots of previous answers & experience in Porto/Cali section - fundamentally no way two tall-ish people one behind the other especially as one is probably still growing

    Compare the age of a cheap Cali to that of a Porto - why should a Porto when it gets to that age not be the same value - so yes after five years of course it is likely the Porto will have halved in value
     
  3. MacNugget

    MacNugget Formula Junior
    Rossa Subscribed

    Aug 12, 2007
    585
    Tejas Hill Country
    They’re all on the fast track to worthless, doubly so once they pass into the hands of owners who can’t or won’t stomach the running costs which don’t depreciate like the cars themselves.

    You should only buy one if you intend to use it and consider the money you paid as spent. Front engine, 8 cylinder Ferraris are not the right car for anyone worried or bothered about the depreciation.
     
  4. mcw

    mcw Formula Junior
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Aug 10, 2008
    529
    No person, small or big, with or without legs, fits in the rear seats of the Cali/Porto series for any duration. The owner manual recommends no one over somewhere near 50" tall in the back for roll bar and top safety reasons and modern baby seats don't work in the space. Some people claim happiness with rear seats occupied anyway. Try using a rear seat and reading the owner manual guidance yourself to get your own sense. I never use the rears for people.

    Ferraris overall are not recommended for people worried about depreciation. Some periods they don't fall dramatically compared to other car makes. Typically the only brand pretty sure to fall faster in percentage resale value is Aston Martin (maybe also McLaren?).
     
    MacNugget likes this.
  5. Jake555

    Jake555 Rookie

    Sep 5, 2025
    5
    Full Name:
    Jacob Frith
    I disagree that they will bomb to nothing. They all bottom out at parts value surely? Consider an early California that starts, drives, changes gears properly etc. such a car is available for 45k

    Guesstimate used parts values;

    Engine,-15k
    Gearbox- 15k
    Wheels 1k each
    Doors- 3 k each
    Hood mechanism- 5k
    Diff- 5k
    Bumpers-2k each

    That's about 50k already
    Without glass, lights, carbon ceramic brake bits, body shell, interior etc etc.

    I think the running costs are quite reasonable for what these cars are. Fixed price servicing from Ferrari main dealer is £850 per year Inc vat here in the UK.

    I can afford to buy such a luxury car and run it because for many years I have been reasonably careful with my outgoings. Many performance car owners are like this. They look for value for money in everything they own, and they are only in a position of owning ' nice things' because they have been consistently good with money in all aspects of their lives for a while. I've been around long enough to learn not to take leave of all my financial senses just because I'm buying car with a horse on the front.

    All these sort of cars will burn a lot of money. But some Ferraris are destined to burn an awful lot more than others. It just strikes me as prudent to think about this a bit.

    I will be looking after it and servicing it in the dealer network and keeping it in a good resale able state because it would be financial idiocy not to.

    I've looked at all 3 cars today, tried my son in the back of them and have pretty much settled on a Cali T. The Calis look way better in the flesh than they look in photos. Pretty much 95% as good as the Portos, but clearly further along the depreciation curve.
     
    KS_California likes this.
  6. Jake555

    Jake555 Rookie

    Sep 5, 2025
    5
    Full Name:
    Jacob Frith
    Rear seat use will be for occasional emergency use. It's OK. Doable. Not luxurious. My son fits slightly better in the rear of a Porto than a Cali, but they are both pretty dismal. Half an hour max I'd say.

    Realistically though, I will be avoiding using this car in wet weather and the dead of winter so mainly will have roof down and therefore lots of headroom. It will 95% of the time be being used as a 2 seater. Rear Headroom with roof up is definitely better in the Porto.

    In both cars, on the passenger side I ((6ft3) was comfortable with my son (5ft 10) behind me. It's doable enough to make the car work for me. Let's face it, it works for me better than anything mid engined could.
     
    KS_California likes this.
  7. Portofino

    Portofino Formula Junior

    Sep 17, 2011
    914
    Yorkshire UK / Switzerland/ Antibes France
    Full Name:
    Portofino
    #7 Portofino, Sep 6, 2025
    Last edited: Sep 6, 2025
    Been in F car ownership for over 30 yrs with two kids ( now flown the nest ) . A school age I had a Testarossa, followed by a 360 F1 .
    There was never really any need to carry more than one kid . When we even attended Ferrari owners club annual meets , the wife went with one kid in the Range Rover and the other kid. + myself in the F car .
    Occasionally I would pick a kid from school if one was late etc .

    If I was you I would drop the 3 pax thingy and simply purchase a 360/430 manual .
    You seem spooked by depreciation but if you choose carefully there won’t be any . Go for a red mid engined ( Giallio 2 nd choice) manual .
    Avoid the two front engined V8 s . Neither fish nor foul .
    Also you say dealer maintenance…..but the Cali + Porto are so full of electrotwackery and reliant on dealer diagnostic software you are leaving yourself very wide open to huge bills over and above a simple lub change .
    Then there’s the CCB s ….have you priced even the pads up nether mind the actual disks themselves?
    Both have electronic solinoids embedded in the gearbox soaked in oil …..age / time there’s an inevitability to a gearbox repairs .
    I say repairs in kindness assuming you find an Indy as the franchised dealers are glorified parts throwers and will only sell you a new box .
    Hence the depreciation of both your potential F cars .It’s the repair bills that’s killing them .

    Turn the thing on its head once you cross the mental barrier of your kid with wife won’t want to go out with you at the same time .
    Buy a analogue well maintained 348 in particular a spider ( 17 left U.K. reg ) they only built just over a 1000 world wide .
    There’s more F40 s around.

    No need for franchised dealer support relatively simple as a wheel barrow maintenance wise with zero “sword of Damocles “ nasty bills looming .
    Bottomed out a decade ago , so on the rise price wise .
    Afraid the Cali + Porto will continue to sink and thus shrink your wealth .
    If this is of no concern …..you tossed depreciation into the equation remember then go ahead and put by an additional £25 K slush fund which eventually will find its way into the franchised dealers account , over and above what you have given them in routine maintenance.

    All Ferrari are great drives but some from a financial aspect are better than others .

    edit Porto’s might have some residual of the 7 yr power warranties? That’s a nice warm blanket for a while .
     
    KS_California and boxerman like this.
  8. anunakki

    anunakki Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Oct 8, 2005
    79,603
    Las Vegas Nevada
    Full Name:
    Jerry
    UK market definitely different than the States. Californias here have been stable and slightly rising for years. Portofinos still depreciating but very slowly.

    Ive been watching closely as Im buying one for Christmas.
     
  9. mcw

    mcw Formula Junior
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Aug 10, 2008
    529
    Good for you to try and learn for yourself about rear seat use. The Porto has a thinner front seat back than Cali T, this gives a bit more rear room.

    I still recommend reading the many pages at different places about rear seat occupants. It might be worth considering where a rear passenger head could be located under accident conditions which fire the explosive roll bars. I won't allow any of my family to be at that risk.
     
  10. Portofino

    Portofino Formula Junior

    Sep 17, 2011
    914
    Yorkshire UK / Switzerland/ Antibes France
    Full Name:
    Portofino
    I run a Bertone GT4 too . It’s appreciating btw . Anyhow the 4 seater thing was a response from owners of the GT Dino , sales stalled and what little feedback Enzo listened to was the overwhelming lack of inside practicable space = hence the +2 .
    The rear seats are to just place a coat , brief case , shopping etc ….to add to the practicality swaying it to more every day use .
    That was early 70 s .
    Fasr fwd 50 yrs and the same principle from Ferraris pov applies . They did come up with the 365/ 400 proper 4 seater as today they have the modern GTC 4 AWD full four seater , remember in the 90 s the 456 .

    I think the Cali / Porto fit that niche a more touring practical car .

    MCW ^ has made a good point re safety and reading the semi disclaimer in the operators hand book re sitting a person in the rear .

    As an aside re operators manual I recall with the 360 on the page about the “ sport “ button it clearly said in bold RED ink ( never seen a car manual with this font before red ink only on page …think of the printing cost? ) ….something along the lines of -

    “ Danger if you switch this off there’s a serious risk of loss of life “

    “ recommend only switch this off on a track not a public road “

    Words to that effect ^ . It was referring to the traction control button .
    Was a three way switch . Normal , sport or off .

    Consequently I never switched it off …ie heeded the written warning .

    Just saying .
     
  11. Portofino

    Portofino Formula Junior

    Sep 17, 2011
    914
    Yorkshire UK / Switzerland/ Antibes France
    Full Name:
    Portofino
    It’s bcz of the finance thingy .
    There’s a strong culture here of “ renting “ paying monthly’s in the U.K. . Perhaps too strong .
    Dealers love it and there’s a glut of finance Co s to fill that demand .

    This means a glut of new sales , followed by a glut of nearly new and young cars . Some with several owners within a year all franchised . Obviously eventually they drop into the specialist car dealers if they don’t meet the franchised dealers acceptance criteria .Guys just swap cars for the sake of it , many oblivious to the difference between a crank shaft and cam shaft .

    I once new a guy back in the early noughties who converted my 360 . I paid £38k cash no finance , post financial crash of 2008 ( remember that ? )
    Sold it 9 yrs later for £54 K it was effectively free Ferrari motoring for me added 20 K miles .As it’s appreciation covered the running costs .

    My mate specced a new 430 back in 2007 list as around £130 K he added £25 k in spec moving it £155k .

    He put down £5 K GBP bcz he could with a £95k ballon and funded it with £2700 a month payments .

    After a few yrs (long story short ) it was sold before the agreement ended and they ended up paying the finance Co £20 K to get out .I can’t remember the exact finance Co offer ..somewhere around £75 K . The car had under 5 K miles .Hardly used .

    So there will be plenty of U.K. high end cars running around with similar profiles finance wise .
    Leading to a glut which depresses prices .
     
    anunakki likes this.
  12. WashingtonFerrari61

    WashingtonFerrari61 Formula Junior

    Jun 26, 2022
    497
    Northern, VA
    The Portofino has been holding up better than all the others in its same class. The Roma which I love is about the same price of a Portofino which should be a sign to let you know where the value is headed. I honestly think the Portofino might be the best eight cylinder, comfortable GT Ferrari ever made for a consumer looking to protect himself from a depreciation standpoint. I like the Roma more but the car market is showing that its older brother is more liked.
     
    Cigarzman likes this.
  13. Iain

    Iain F1 Rookie

    Jan 21, 2005
    3,354
    UK
    I'd agree with this. From what i've seen, I think Portofinos in the UK are also cheap in comparison to Europe or the US. They suffered fairly rapid depreciation and then settled in the £115k-£130k range and seem to be fairly stuck there. Porto Ms are still over £150k.

    The biggest factor seems to be mileage (as always) with 30K mile cars being at the low end. There are still plenty of sub 10K mile cars about. Those numbers are then propped up by the Cali and Cali T below them. Good Cali Ts are still making £90k+ & those will continue to ensure Portofino prices stay at £100k+ for quite a while imo.

    Right now in the UK on Autotrader there are 32 Portofinos and 9 Porto Ms for sale. Those numbers have been fairly constant all this year. There are 64 Romas currently for sale & that probably has something to do with softer prices. You only have to look at 296s to see the effect numbers have on depreciation, there are nearly 100 of them for sale ( 65 GTBs and 32 GTSs).
     
  14. Cigarzman

    Cigarzman F1 Veteran
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    I’ve had my 2019 Portofino about 3.5 years and daily drive it adding about 12,000 miles. My car has depreciated approximately 70-80k in this timeframe based on trade numbers I was receiving recently. This is solid and current data.
     
  15. rubisco

    rubisco Rookie

    Jan 11, 2024
    38
    Im located in the U.S. but my dealer has mentioned that California Ts have been selling really well lately and ive noticed them ticking up in price.
     
  16. Zarakoff

    Zarakoff Karting

    Jul 8, 2020
    199
    Uk
    Full Name:
    Ian Curley
    The Portofino is always going be pecked up value wise by the California and they probably at the lowest point now when Covid hit the prices went mad and a portofino went up around £30k over night they are back where they should be now .
    California £45 low spec high miles £80good spec low miles
    Cali t £70 - £95
    Portofino £110 low spec high miles £130 high spec low miles
    These differences in prices will stick so if it was me I’d be getting the spec I want the colour I want with the right miles and on time service history
    It’s going loose but over say 5 years the £130 one will be £100 k you’ve lost £30 k
    But think of the first owner a good spec Portofino will set you back £210 ish from new he’s going loose £80 you’ve lost £30 k
    Don’t worry about it just enjoy it
    If you don’t want to loose any money get a 488 pista
     
  17. Iain

    Iain F1 Rookie

    Jan 21, 2005
    3,354
    UK
    About right I'd say. My car depreciated around £100k from new to when I bought it with 6700 miles on it as the 3rd owner. Its a high spec car in Rosso Portofino.

    I don't expect it to repeat anywhere near that for the next 6700 miles!
     

Share This Page