The (one and only) '0846' Debate Thread

It is shocking how common this is.

I have had this issue before on a Shelby and currently a gt40

 

He drove it at the historic targa in italy waaay into this whole thing... They could've done it then.

 

Then wouldn't the same be true for Pipers P4? Afterall, if it is indeed a whatever you want to call it, allegedly built by Piper, then the same is true for the P4 Piper owns, unless Enzo's "blessing" was indeed for only one car to be built. If built by Pipes, they are essentially in the same wheelhouse.

 

O

I keep hearing of this "penchant for litigation", can you provide several examples of this? As a "penchant for litigation" implies more than a couple IMO. Are these examples of frivolous litigation? or deserved litigation?... is also something I would like to hear your opinion on, as I think we can agree that no matter how many cases one may file, if the are indeed deserved, then they are justified.

Just my opinion of course, but I think that the idea that JG is gonna out-lawyer Ferrari, is a bit of a fantasy.

 

Will you finally be updating the site and removing the "fake Glickenhaus P4" ("falsa P4 di Glinkenhaus") and pictures from your 330 P3/P4 0846 page in link here? I see you posted the email from Ing. Mauro Forghieri, the car's designer who oversaw its creation, development from P3 to P4, its racing history and scrapping at Ferrari in which he clearly stated the Glickenhaus car is a fake.

The car is now widely recognised, and has proven to be a fake after Forghieri's determination and the evidence posted in links here.

 

"... widely... " !?!

 

Yes, "... widely..."

Re-read the post that you want to disregard.

The factory engineer says it's a fake. The scientific evidence that Steve has repeatedly posted absolutely backs that up.

Instead of blindly rage reacting to every single one of Steve's posts... how 'bout making a case of your own? If you see it differently, point out WHY.

The entire "counter argument" is that Steve has a beef...

Yeah, Steve has a very real beef... that so many people choose to be sycophants in this case while otherwise criticizing other cars with less dubious histories. It's a consistent inconsistency.

 

This thread must have broken some sort of internet car forum record by now. Its like the energizer bunny..it just keeps going..

 

Some of you guys need to get a life, another hobby (maybe a vintage car or two ?) or perhaps get laid to relieve some of that "blind rage" and "a very real beef ...".
I realize gainful employment is no longer an option for some, hence the "beef", but I believe it's self-inflicted ...

P.S. In case some here (obviously) missed it, I made my case loooong ago and still waiting for answers to some questions (but not holding my breath), yet I do find some of this entertaining or dare I say funny and sad at the same time.

 

The car is a beautiful recreation. Pretty much end of story..