FORMULA 1 GRAN PREMIO DE LA CIUDAD DE MEXICO 2025.....Race..............▄▀▄▀▄▀ SPOILERS ▄▀▄▀▄▀ | Page 16 | FerrariChat

FORMULA 1 GRAN PREMIO DE LA CIUDAD DE MEXICO 2025.....Race..............▄▀▄▀▄▀ SPOILERS ▄▀▄▀▄▀

Discussion in 'F1' started by jgonzalesm6, Oct 25, 2025 at 9:43 PM.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. TonyL

    TonyL F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2007
    Messages:
    4,317
    Location:
    Norfolk - UK
    Full Name:
    Tony
    watch the highlights and re-examine your list! Most of it is just your opinion. Mark your own homework but you must try harder

     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2025 at 4:57 PM
  2. SS454

    SS454 Formula 3

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2021
    Messages:
    2,304
    Full Name:
    Chris S
    I don't need to watch anything. Lets hear YOUR rebuttal. You say I'm wrong, then prove me wrong. I gave you a detailed list of facts, you want to say it's false then prove it. I've done more than enough to prove you are wrong, so go ahead and disprove the facts I've presented.
     
  3. TonyL

    TonyL F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2007
    Messages:
    4,317
    Location:
    Norfolk - UK
    Full Name:
    Tony
    Unfortunately you do need to watch it, most of your facts are opinions and your POV and are entitled to those, you prove zilch.
    eg
    It is not against the rules to simply go off track - fact Untrue no driver should leave the track unless justifiable reason. read my post 329
    Tony
    PS dont troll, you appear to be better than that.
     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2025 at 5:48 PM
  4. SS454

    SS454 Formula 3

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2021
    Messages:
    2,304
    Full Name:
    Chris S
    I am not surprised in the least that you would refuse to even attempt to try to prove me wrong. I welcome anyone to give it a try though.

    Max was justified to leave the track on both occasions. Just because you don't agree doesn't make it false.
    Leaving the track does not mean an automatic penalty. Drivers are even given 3 free unjustified track limit violations before a penalty is enforced.
    If you believe either of the above then by default you would have to believe Lewis Hamilton deserved an additional 10 second penalty, maybe even 20 seconds. He left the track without justification, he didn't use the escape road that he was supposed to, AND he held the advantage gained. Is that 10, 20, 30 seconds worth of penalties or even more?

    You could have saved face the whole time by just saying that you believe the rules in F1 suck, the Mexico track layout doesn't punish enough for cutting across the grass, etc etc. Its your opinion and anyone can agree with you, perhaps including myself on certain points. Instead you chose to die on a hill that is clear to anyone and everyone that you choose to deny facts, you refuse to prove your claims or disprove facts given to you, you have a clear negative bias towards Max, you will attack ones facts as opinions, you suggest opinions that don't support yours are wrong and yet you will use opinions that support your beliefs and claim them to be facts. Believe what you want, it won't change the results.

    I'm out.
     
    HotShoe likes this.
  5. watt

    watt Formula 3

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2004
    Messages:
    2,397
    Location:
    Northern Rocky Mountains
    Full Name:
    Giuseppe T Hemingway
    Tony babee, Gag you with a spoon, you're becoming an insufferable bore, yes you hate Max haha who lives in your head charging massive rent you don't have the cashflow to pay. It's always Max's fault, why we're beginning to think the old Bwit only fetish has taken you over like Brundle, sky spew and other notables....hopefully you'll be over it after Halloween.
     
    absostone likes this.

Share This Page