Factory I know, that they also used Conolly. But the 288 did not use Conolly. And the BB had a similar Leather, that is different to Conolly.
It was my understanding that the BBi was Connolly – specifically Vaumol. Again, not an expert by any means, but the sheen and wear on this 288 seat (55169) looks similar to what I've seen on a BB/BBi – which would indicate Ferrari was using Vaumol for at least some of the 288 as well (later than I thought). Image Unavailable, Please Login
I just ordered some Vaumol hides from Connolly which I intended on using in my 365BB restoration. I'm concerned about the level of Pebbling in the grain of the leather and the thickness is over 2mm making it very difficult to recreate the original piping and other details. Also all the Vaumol period Ferrari's I have been in or involved in restoring have a reasonable subtle leather grain. I realise there is a naturalness factor with leather but has anyone else encountered similar issues with the modern Connolly? Thoughts on the attached photos? Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
I received a sample Vaumol from Worlduph; which had a smooth texture. They only said it came from the UK (not Connolly specifically). I'm waiting on a sample from Luppi, who specifically said he used Connolly Vaumol. When it arrives, I'll let you know the texture and thickness. Of the samples I've received so far (Worlduph Autolux, Worlduph Vaumol, and GAHH), none had that waxy sheen I've seen on original interiors (including my own). You might want to reach out Henk for your 365.
