Enzo, CGT, SLR, Murc, Continential GT, DB9 comparision | FerrariChat

Enzo, CGT, SLR, Murc, Continential GT, DB9 comparision

Discussion in '288GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari' started by 62 250 GTO, Jun 1, 2004.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. 62 250 GTO

    62 250 GTO F1 Veteran

    Jan 9, 2004
    7,765
    Nova Scotia Canada
    Full Name:
    Neil
    #1 62 250 GTO, Jun 1, 2004
    The Table is:
    Car/Name
    Motor/Cylinders
    Power
    Torque
    Tyres
    Gearbox
    Acceleration:
    0-100kph (62mph)
    0-200kph (124mph)
    0-300kph (186mph)
    400m (quarter mile)
    1000m (standing km)
    Braking from 250kph
    sound at 300kph
    Handling Course 1.6km (~1 mile)
    Top Speed
    Price

    If it's a repost, shut up!
     
  2. zjpj

    zjpj F1 Veteran

    Nov 4, 2003
    6,124
    USA
    #2 zjpj, Jun 1, 2004
    Where's the table?
     
  3. 62 250 GTO

    62 250 GTO F1 Veteran

    Jan 9, 2004
    7,765
    Nova Scotia Canada
    Full Name:
    Neil
    #3 62 250 GTO, Jun 1, 2004
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  4. amenasce

    amenasce Three Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Oct 17, 2001
    33,077
    Full Name:
    Joe Mansion
    #4 amenasce, Jun 1, 2004
    This table is bollocks..A murcielago outbraking an Enzo ? Crazy germans..
     
  5. 62 250 GTO

    62 250 GTO F1 Veteran

    Jan 9, 2004
    7,765
    Nova Scotia Canada
    Full Name:
    Neil
    #5 62 250 GTO, Jun 1, 2004
    By 3 feet from 250 kph - 0
    That won't make a bit of difference when making a purchase.
     
  6. amenasce

    amenasce Three Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Oct 17, 2001
    33,077
    Full Name:
    Joe Mansion
    #6 amenasce, Jun 1, 2004

    It shouldnt..The Enzo should have similiar # as the CGT. The F50 brakes better than a Murcie without ABS and the bigger carbon composite brakes..
     
  7. 62 250 GTO

    62 250 GTO F1 Veteran

    Jan 9, 2004
    7,765
    Nova Scotia Canada
    Full Name:
    Neil
    #7 62 250 GTO, Jun 1, 2004
    I wish I knew where this table comes from. I read a lot of numbers on the net and they vary sooo much. I don't really believe any anymore.
     
  8. HoboPie

    HoboPie Karting

    Apr 16, 2004
    212
    #8 HoboPie, Jun 1, 2004
    It comes from a recent Auto Motor und Sport Magazine. They are a trusted publisher and they did the test at Nardo.

    There has to be something wrong with the brakes of the Enzo though. The Enzo already should have the Murcielago by about 20 ft after an 80mph braking. After that the Enzo has every advantage and the gap should get much bigger.

    I also talked to someone who actually did some work on the CGT and a lot of work on the new 997 series. He said the CGT MIGHT have a slight braking advantage, but everything he had heard even from a test mule they borrowed was the Enzo was pretty comparable.

    24m is a huge gap and explains most of the lap time. The tightness of the track probably didn't let the Enzo's downforce come into play as much as a slightly larger track explains anything else.
     
  9. 62 250 GTO

    62 250 GTO F1 Veteran

    Jan 9, 2004
    7,765
    Nova Scotia Canada
    Full Name:
    Neil
    #9 62 250 GTO, Jun 1, 2004
    Hobo pie? That's good!
    Well like I posted above, unless a bunch of guys get together and hammer out some numbers, who the heck can tell? A foot here a tenth there. It's too close a ball game to guess at anything.
     

Share This Page