© 2025 DRIVEN LIFESTYLE. All rights reserved.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
That 488 sounds too much fast if your TTS was tuned. Stock 488 are low 6's seconds from 100 to 200 kph, I don't get why your TTS should be so...
Agree about engine power figures, not so sure concerning Vbox numbers with the Porsches. At the end it will be translated in the same way, both...
The reason I think is just a choice of engines production. It seems they use the lower part of their tolerances. Sometimes it need Vpower gas fo...
Porsche is always conservative about power but there are some test out of size for customer cars, too.
I also heard everything too, but not only by Ferrari...
This is always the same situation when comparing customer cars with press ones. Usually makers has a fleet of cars that will been used for press...
It's still slow. Low 6's is the right time.
People need to use rationality more often instead to be invaded by red mist. Above all there is the logic and phisic laws both factors not...
1600 Nm @ 6500 rpm means 1480 hp
A question of mechanical grip over all.
The guy lives in his world.
Agree, my check was mainly to show if runs in the video were lying because it seems people were claimed it was non sense.
Visioneer, I will try to explain why the Ferrari seems to be over estimated in my opinion. The reason is explained by the 918, being over 100/140...
In my opinion the LaFerrari is just a little overestimated.
And to conclude the analysis of the 918: [img] The test in the video published a 60 to 150 mph time 8.4 seconds, instead of 8.6 seconds by the...
Here the analysis of the P1: [img] The test in the video published a 60 to 150 mph time of 7.99 seconds for the P1. The result obtained by the...
This is the analysis I did: [img] During the run in the video the LaFerrari in the example did 60 to 150 mph time in 8.44 seconds. I can do the...
My consideration was that to overlaying the telemetry materials we have to confirm me that behind a part of data there was a lot of familiarity....
No. Just right reasonings and good considerations. What was the conclusion by people to say the video was found lacking?
It's not mandatory but it's rare I'm wrong.
