FROM AUTOSPORT: Rivals teams rejected an offer from Ross Brawn to tidy up the technical regulations 12 months ago, and head off the possibility of double decker diffuser designs being adopted. While the row over diffusers continues to overshadow the sport, ahead of a hearing of the FIA's International Court of Appeal in April, Brawn has revealed that at a meeting of technical directors last March, he proposed modifying the rules to ensure that proper limits were introduced on areas teams could exploit. "In March 2008 that was offered," said Brawn, when asked by AUTOSPORT about the matter. "If I'm frank I didn't say 'look we are going to do this diffuser if you don't accept this rule' because I'm not going to tell people what we're doing, but I explained that I felt that we should have a different set of rules to simplify what needs to be done. "I offered them and they were rejected, so my conscience is very clear. And those rules that I put on the table would have stopped a lot of things. It would have stopped the diffuser, it would have stopped all those bargeboards around the front, and it would have cleaned the cars up. "Because it was clear that when we started to work on the regulations that there were things that you could do, and we needed to perhaps clean them up, but nobody was interested. They are interested now." Brawn GP has been protested, along with Williams and Toyota, at the opening two races of the season for the diffuser design that rival teams do not believe are legal. The stewards at both the Australian and Malaysian Grands Prix, however, have stated that they believe the designs are within the regulations. Despite what happened with the offer to change the rules last year, Brawn says he has not been frustrated by the protests, although he has expressed some disappointment at critical comments aimed his way by Flavio Briatore. "I don't like some of the comments some of the other team principals are making but they are uneducated and uninformed so if they looked at the facts then they would realise that," he said. "But I have always tried to wear two hats. One is what is good for Formula 1 and I wear that hat for a certain period, then I take that hat off and I wear the 'what's good for my team' one be it Ferrari or whoever it is. "For sure there are periods when I am very happy to say what is good for Formula 1 and that is the period a year to 18 months before you start doing a car. What's the best thing to do? "When we get in to designing the car and actually creating it, you can't go back then and say 'oh we have found this great new feature I had better stop it', its a different hat you have to wear. "And everybody in F1 I hope does that. When there is plenty of time you try and get the rules in the best shape you can, and when the rules are decided you have to go flat out in producing the best car you can within those regulations."
This is incredible. It makes the tech people from all the other teams look like complete idiots. Brawn deserves to win the WCC, his drivers deserve to win the WDC. Diffusers should be considered legal. I think Ross Brawn should join Smokey Yunick and Jim Hall as racing's all time true innovators. And also best rule readers!!
Brawn GP deserves the wins they are getting and most likely both titles. My only hope is that Ferrari's 20million euro redesign makes the car competitive enough to fight for wins later in the season.
Varsha pointed our something that highlights the ridiculous knots that F1 is tying itself up with. The $20 million redesign for a simple diffuser is nearly the same as the TOTAL $30 million annual budget that Mosley wants F1 teams to adhere to starting next season. Needless to say, somethings got to give....
RB is THE MAN!..... He made his offer about a year back, and goes public just a week before the hearing - Man, he's good! Can anyone *imagine* the *howls* herein if it were, just for example, MW saying the same thing? Cheers, Ian
Interesting comment. Let the others catch up. Seriously, if this was Ferrari or McLaren people would be saying things like 'They have the benefit of greater resources and manpower to discover and exploit grey areas like this.' When it's Brawn, it's cheating.
Brawn is a genius and I have the highest respect for him as he is the most knowledgeable person on F1 in the world.
I think he is saying that people who claim Brawn are cheating are the same people who would call it "better exploitation of the rules through better resources" if Ferrari had done it. I think there is ZERO change that the diffuser teams are going to be told to stop running them. I also think giving the other teams something else to let them catch up would be a very bad idea. Either it's kosher or it's not. By the letter of the law, it is kosher. Ok, so then the other teams need to ante up and match it. If it would cost $20mm for Ferrari to replicate it, then surely it would also cost Brawn $20mm to eliminate it. This season has been great so far. The change to the pecking order is fantastic, and I think TV viewership is probably higher than ever. This season so far has been a great success with all the additional passing, and there is no way the FIA is going to eliminate what is probably the biggest reason for a lot of the success of this season so far - the diffusers - especially not at the expense of dealing a blow to Williams, Toyota and Brawn that they can't afford. It will be ruled legal and that will be that - mark my words. Then the other teams will bellyache about it and then they will implement it shortly after (no doubt they are already working on it), and the field will get even closer, which will be even better.
Guys it's not just the difuser that has made the Brawn car fast, it is the fact that this car was started well before any other car and thus was finished first, probably had the most testing, etc. Brawn was the new boy with Honda and thus was not interested in their current car (which was a piece of ****) and thus would have directed his teams into the new car. This always happens and Ferrari have done this in the past when they gave up on poor designs (which is what they should again do this year). Pete
Wow! Whatever happened to patience?........ We're 1 1/2 races into a 17 race season and you want to throw in the towel? A rough calculation shows a team could score a maximum of just over 300 WCC points this year (Slightly less due to 1/2 points this past weekend) They've awarded a maximum of 27 of those so far. (Per team) So, with roughly 92% of the season points still available I think it's *way* too early to quit - In racing (false?) hope springs eternal don't forget. They'll get there - Doubt they'll win it all, but I certainly don't want to see 'em doing a Honda - going out in Q1 saying "we're concentrating on next year" (At least until we've had a few Euro races at least) Cheers, Ian
I meant it's a double standard. When Brawn introduces a design that takes advantage of grey areas in the rules, there's an uproar that it's out of bounds an should be banned. Had it been a Ferrari or Mac, the thinking is typically different.
OK. I hear what you're saying, but honestly believe the uproar would have been the same had you permed any 3 of 10 in this case - If just one of 'em had come up with it it would have been banned by now [Mass dampers anyone?] What's starting to worry me is if the 7 can "gang up" on the 3 in the hearing and get it declared illegal - I'm pretty sure they're not going to mess with the results so far, but it would suck big time if Brawn et al have to redesign *their* cars..... Cheers, Ian
+1. And I think the $20M quoted for the redesign is a total smoke screen. I wouldn't be surprised to see some teams show up with modified diffusers even before they get back to Europe. Then look for Red Bull to move up -- they're already fast without the trick diffuser. - Eric
From some stuff I have read, BrawnGP is the one that is closest to the regs of the 3 teams in question. We don't know if all or any of those teams will have their diffusers declared legal or illegal. Remember, they are running 3 different diffusers. One team's diffuser could be declared illegal while the other are not. Either way, I'm not worried about it. Brawn's cars performance is due to it's whole aero package, not just the rear diffuser as we have seen by Barichello's performance the Australian GP when he had damage to his front wing and a destroyed rear diffuser.
Interesting - Source please? "closest to the regs" could be taken either way: Closest *inside* 'em or closest outside...... +1 OTOH, these 3 have been pretty heavily "singled out" - They've done *something* nobody else thought of. +1 I just hope they're all found to be legal - Toyota could probably do a quick redesign, but Williams and the Flyer I'm not so sure about. What's especially galling to me is Ross *told* em a year back! I guess we'll find out soon enough. Cheers, Ian
My understanding is that of all the cars the Red Bull would need the biggest redesign to accept one of the double diffusers, due to their rear suspension design.
Problem is that now that the season has started there's no track testing allowed other than the Friday before the race. Computer sims can only go so far (ask McL who have a world beater according to their computer) and such a radical design change would need real world data.