308 owner takes issue | FerrariChat

308 owner takes issue

Discussion in '308/328' started by heritage58, Oct 22, 2004.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. heritage58

    heritage58 Rookie

    Apr 2, 2004
    12
    Wilmington, NC
    Full Name:
    Tony Di Bernardo
    with the contension of Forza magazine that the F40 is Ferrari's first supercar. It is my position that the 288 GTO was the premier effort of a track car which could be driven home (my personal definition of a supercar). Comments appreciated. Regards, Tony
     
  2. 96impalaSS

    96impalaSS F1 Rookie

    Dec 8, 2003
    3,524
    Hell
    Full Name:
    Chris
    I'd say the 288 GTO is the first true Ferrari Supercar as well.
     
  3. jpl

    jpl Formula Junior

    Dec 4, 2003
    368
    Yulee Florida
    Full Name:
    JP Lavigne
    Define super car?
     
  4. atheyg

    atheyg Guest

    Forza is wrong

    The first supercar would be the original TR or 250 GTO
     
  5. Jdubbya

    Jdubbya The $10 Trillion Man
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 28, 2003
    43,181
    PNW
    Full Name:
    John
    BINGO!! Then the 288 (my favorite Ferrari of all time I might add)
     
  6. 134282

    134282 Four Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Aug 3, 2002
    40,647
    California
    Full Name:
    Carbon McCoy
    i was thinking GTO as well, although TR didn't occur to me... What about the LM - does that count, after the GTO...?
     
  7. Jerrari

    Jerrari F1 Veteran

    Jul 24, 2001
    5,469
    Michigan
    Full Name:
    Jerry Wiersma
    Totally, the GTO for sure!!
     
  8. thecarreaper

    thecarreaper F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Sep 30, 2003
    18,064
    Savannah
    MODERN Ferrari supercar = 288gto. you should make a poll for this thread!! :)
     
  9. Bianco

    Bianco Formula Junior

    Dec 29, 2003
    309
    Las Vegas
    Full Name:
    Jeff
    288 GTO!
     
  10. parkerfe

    parkerfe F1 World Champ

    Sep 4, 2001
    12,887
    Cumming, Georgia
    Full Name:
    Franklin E. Parker
    You need a definition of "supercar" before you can determine if a car is one ?
     
  11. Simon

    Simon Moderator
    Moderator Owner

    Aug 29, 2003
    6,876
    Switzerland
    Full Name:
    Simon
    As much as I like the 288GTO, what was track about it?
     
  12. GTE

    GTE F1 World Champ

    Jun 24, 2004
    10,117
    The Netherlands
    Full Name:
    Marnix
    It was primarily designed to compete in a racerseries that never happened (Group B). It truly is a homologation automobile.
     
  13. patpong

    patpong Formula 3

    Jul 6, 2004
    2,274
    Bangkok, Thailand
    Full Name:
    Patpong Thanavisuth
    FIA announced in the early 80's about Group B racing. That's when the supercar series of Ferrari began with the 288GTO. If FIA had not announced, then there would not have been any of these F40, 50,.. Ferrari supercar series will never happen. 288GTO was a truely supercar even before the term "supercar" was known....
     
  14. Cavallino Motors

    Cavallino Motors F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    May 31, 2001
    14,143
    Florida or Argentina
    Full Name:
    Martin W.
    Without trying to defend the Forza decision: as some have said the 288GTO is a "O" (homologated) version of a race car to run a specific series. Its like the Maser 12, which was built to qualify for racing but despite it being fast and all it was not built as a road car, neither was the GT"O" .

    So in strict terminology the F40 would be the first "Supercar". I personally see the GTO in the same lines and in general it is accepted as part of the Supercar series. By definition it is not. Neither is a Formular One car part of the "Supercar Series" or a P3 or P4.

    As for the Testarossa, well that depends on the Supercar definition. It was at one time the fastest production car, which is a title to have, same as the 550 Maranello, but does that make them Supercars?
    I think the F40 was never the fastest production car of its time, neither is the Enzo.
     
  15. GTE

    GTE F1 World Champ

    Jun 24, 2004
    10,117
    The Netherlands
    Full Name:
    Marnix
    I always felt that today´s supercar-scene was started with the F40. It made performance a raison d´etre, it trampeled political correctness in every way and a lot of cars followed in here wake (and apart from later Ferrari´s and the McLaren F1, no car came even close).
     
  16. Simon

    Simon Moderator
    Moderator Owner

    Aug 29, 2003
    6,876
    Switzerland
    Full Name:
    Simon
    OK I accept that the idea of the 288GTO was intended for Group B, a follow on from the Michelotto 308's...but all 288GTO's built are street cars.

    As far as street legal race cars go, all Ferrari race cars (not Formula cars) up until the 250LM were street legal. And was the F40 really designed as a race car...or rather a road car that lent itself very nicely to a bit of track time?

    And the term supercar was coined in the press when the Miura came out IMO.

    Cheers
    Simon
     
  17. GTE

    GTE F1 World Champ

    Jun 24, 2004
    10,117
    The Netherlands
    Full Name:
    Marnix
    The F40 was presented as a roadgoing racecar and did very well on track (eventually). I think it´s fair to say that the F40 has a strong racing pedigree, allthough the racecar was derived from the roadcar, rather than vice versa.
     
  18. Cavallino Motors

    Cavallino Motors F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    May 31, 2001
    14,143
    Florida or Argentina
    Full Name:
    Martin W.

    Simon, the idea of homologating a car is that ist has to be built in a certain number AND be streetlegal.

    The F40 was never designed to compete in a certain series. Building a "O" means building it as a competition car and then designing it to meet road standards. The F40 was built in the roadcar program but technology from their racing program was used in it. Much like a Challenge car is not a "O".
     
  19. Simon

    Simon Moderator
    Moderator Owner

    Aug 29, 2003
    6,876
    Switzerland
    Full Name:
    Simon

    I know...it was a rhetorical question.

    My point being, that the original poster defined a supercar as being a race car for the road. Neither the 288GTO or the F40 are these IMO. Or the Miura. All of which are supercars IMO.
     
  20. Ron328

    Ron328 F1 Rookie
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 10, 2003
    2,627
    Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Full Name:
    Ron
    "Supercar" - Over 200 mph top speed (15-20 years ago over 180mph), expensive, exclusive, and (very) limited production. Although an F40 is not quite "limited production," it unquestionably falls under the category.
     
  21. coolblue

    coolblue Karting

    May 6, 2004
    217
    The F40 was based on the GTO and the F40 is a supercar..therefore I contend that the GTO was also a supercar...my case rests....somewhere.
     
  22. jpl

    jpl Formula Junior

    Dec 4, 2003
    368
    Yulee Florida
    Full Name:
    JP Lavigne
    In the case of doing 180+mph 15-20 years ago, the first two Boxers meet the spec. 365GT4BB top speed 302km/hr, 512BB also top speed of 302 km/hr. So these must be the first Ferrari super cars. If we go back further I think most of them topped out at around 150-170MPH depending on gearing.

    just my 2 cents.
     
  23. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Nov 20, 2002
    17,673
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    The supercar term has nothing to do with the car being a track model or having any intensions of racing.

    The term supercar was a horrible (I think) 80's term to define really fast road cars ... like the Testarossa, Countach, ie. fat, fast road cars that are built to defend the pathetic top speed battle they got into back then.

    The 288GTO is ABOVE the supercar term because it was actually designed with a purpose, as was the 250GTO, TR and LM.

    The term supercar really is pathetic and I bet came from some pre-teen spotty kid seeing a flashy road car and saying to his dad (who happened to be a car magazine editor) "Gee Dad that is a super car"

    Thankfully the motor industry has matured past that horrible time, and we are back to making cars that have real qualities ... (ie. the Testarossa/Countach was close to useless as a race car in its day ... compared to the F550, F360, etc. that are actually quite effective on the track)

    It is a shame that the F40 has the label of a supercar ... because it did eventually prove itself capable on the track, if only for short times.
    Pete
     
  24. cscott

    cscott Formula Junior

    Dec 31, 2002
    478
    New Orleans
    Full Name:
    Chris Scott
    I think that when the earlier post said GTO and TR, he meant the Testarossa sports racers and not the later production cars. Actually, all of the so called supercars have been production cars, albeit limited production. In Ferrari terms, I think you could start with the 410 Superamerica, 400SA/SF, and 500 Superfast. They were far more expensive (almost double) than all of the now more desirable 250SWB cars and produced up to 400hp. They competed against cars like the Maserati 5000(some equiped with leftover 450s 450hp race engines) and were purchased by royalty and capitani d' industia. All had production numbers under 50 and were no expense spared supercars!
     
  25. ants2au

    ants2au Formula Junior

    Nov 19, 2003
    793
    Sydney Australia
    Full Name:
    Anthony
    I don't know. If you spent as much money on a Testarossa back then as they do now converting a 550 to a GT, I think it would have been just as effective.

    What you think the 550 on the track now has any bits related to the road car (well maybe the door handles).



     

Share This Page