308 Supercharger Dyno run - 300+ HP! | FerrariChat

308 Supercharger Dyno run - 300+ HP!

Discussion in 'Technical Q&A' started by smg2, Sep 29, 2006.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,445
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    #1 smg2, Sep 29, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    there were so many ways i could title this thread but i figured i'd keep it simple. for now i'll post the jpg's he sent over. okay okay more info...

    4th gear run up to 6k, apperantly i can't exceed 100mph so i wasn't able to get past 6k.

    AFR at idle runs 14~15.
    under load it starts at 14 then dips to 13 and stays there until 4500rpm then dips to 11 at 5500 then climbs again. it looks like i need to advance the timing so we did for another run picked up more power and the AFR pulled up to 12. i have a newer mappable electromotive coming in in a few weeks so i can fine tune again and do more pulls.

    the charger is set up for 10psi at 6500rpm.

    and without further ado.....the pics ;)

    p.s. check out the torque curve, pool table anyone?
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  2. GrigioGuy

    GrigioGuy Splenda Daddy
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Nov 26, 2001
    33,382
    E ' ' '/ F
    Full Name:
    Enzo Gorlomi
    Is that rear wheel HP numbers, or calculated-crank numbers? What was the pre-charger base number, 205 @ crank?


    Most importantly, how does it drive?

    Very nice.....
     
  3. hanknum

    hanknum Formula 3

    Nov 1, 2003
    2,050
    Santa Barbara
    Full Name:
    Henry
  4. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,445
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    sorry,
    yes those are rear wheel HP numbers. this was done on a mustang dynojet. precharger base number was 193hp and 183tq, two pulls were done without the charger belted and the air unrestricted. we then got right to the meat of it :). i spent 4hrs on the dyno and we did probably around a dozen pulls. all in the same 300~330hp range. kept tweaking the ignition curve.

    these were low numbers to the shop who regularly do 500~700hp subies, but for some reason a boosted ferrari attracted quite the crowd. and they all seemed very impressed. the torque curve really got their attention.
     
  5. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,445
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    pulls like a frieght train!!! short shift to third gear then nail it and it will lift the front noticably. 1st goes quick second can get loose and third is the sweet spot. passing on the freeway is soooo easy and the car just launches!
     
  6. miketuason

    miketuason F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Feb 24, 2006
    15,831
    Cerritos, CA.
    Full Name:
    Mike
    Me too I like
     
  7. racespecferrari

    racespecferrari F1 Veteran

    Jan 31, 2006
    7,583
    Suffolk, Uk
    Full Name:
    Pete.G By The Sea
    Excellent, will you be doing a kit
     
  8. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,792
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    Looks good Scott!

    A word of caution. The engine will make the most hp at an A/F of about 13-13.2, but that is WHY to lean for a boosted engine to survive. You want to stay below 12, 11ish is better if you are up around 10psi.

    Question. Have you been able to measure the boost in the intake at various rpms yet? I can see the boost coming in between about 2500-3000, which is about 500-1000 rpm lower than I expected to see it and on top you've got 337rwhp at 6000rpm....that should turn into 370-400 at 7000-7500..... you may have more boost than you think. It could just be that the CIS is so restrictive that the intake normally runs at minus 1-2 psi, so when you made it +10 the net was more like 12.

    Question. Are you running to drive ratio you originally picked?....I was so sure that would come out low, but it looks like you're high if anything.

    Question. If the dyno guy was giving you a 100mph limit, why didn't you shift to 3rd and pick-up your hp peak? You missed the best part of the graph :)

    Question. Was it a mustang dyno or a dynojet dyno? On a dyno jet, you'd need a 328 to make 193rwhp at 6000. Mustang dynos are generally heart breakers as they tend to come in below dynojet numbers. Your 193rwhp should be about 220 at 6800, maybe 240 if that was before you tuned up the timing. That is a LOT for a 2Vi engine that new only made 195 at the crank or 160-170rwhp . I know there is some question about how stock the rebuild was, but that is still a lot. I guess the follow-on question is does your buddy have all the settings right on that dyno? It looks like the numbers are high by 25-30%...any chance he's got the dyno set to convert to crank hp and has the loss number set up around 25%?

    At the end of the day it's just the % increase that matters I guess, and you've done a GREAT job with a 75% bump!....with what sounds like more to come, since you've got parts are on the way.
     
  9. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,445
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG

    thanks mark,
    the AFR was being read at the tail pipe so i'd expect it to be a bit richer than were reading. the AFR was a nice level line hovering around 12 then droping off past 4500rpm into the 11~10 range. might be a timing issue and then again due to it still running the CIS it also could be a control pressure or regulator thing. more testing is going to be done. however in the first few runs, advancing the timing started to smooth out and lean the AFR which raised the power from 289 to 337.

    no we didn't measure the boost on the manifold, i'm still waiting on some parts. this run was a last mintue deal, he called me up and said come on down. can't argue as it was FREE!

    we tried 3rd but the rev limit kept me from hitting 100mph, not sure why so we went for 4th and for me thats fine as 4th is closer to 1:1.

    i was too excited about the numbers to read the top of the page right, it's a Mustang Dynanometer. we were measuring wheel HP, and unless the dyno runs it's own conversion he did not supply one for it. the boost numbers i have are from vortech per the pulley sizes. 3" & 6" so it's been calculated to hit 10psi @ 7krpm and would climb to 12 @ 8krpm. i haven't been past 6600rpm.

    the numbers suprised me but at the same time not really, they match all the calcs i did when i started the project. after having done a compression and leak down on the motor i know it's not stock so i have an advantage there, by how much i'm not sure. possibly 25~30hp. i'm running redline 10~30 oil and 75~90NS gear oil. water temps were 190 and oil was 210. ambient air was 85~90 depending on run and heat soak.

    like yourself i went over the motor before i started. re-timed the cams and did the valve adjustment. so having a fresh motor is a good head start :)
     
  10. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,445
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    also i think alot of it is due to the mapp going right dead nuts center thru the efficiency island of the compressor. the compressor is working optimally with motor thru the rev range and it shows! the boost is coming on sooner than i had planed but only by about 500rpm.
     
  11. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,445
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    it should be noted that the engine has zero emission crap on it. the air pump is gone, the egr is no longer functioning (dead EGR). the air nozzels were removed and the holes pluged with custom made plugs. euro headers and test pipes dumping into a tubi. oil evap goes to a vented moroso tank.

    aside from the US cams its closer to euro specs than US.
     
  12. Mike C

    Mike C F1 Veteran
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 3, 2002
    6,081
    Southeast USA
    Full Name:
    Mike Charness
    I see this still has the stock CIS as you originally planned, but you mentioned tuning the ignition curve and a newer mapable electromotive coming in. Please explain a bit more... Thanks, and congratulations!
     
  13. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,445
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    the stock distributors would not be a good idea to run with this setup. i have the electromotive ignition an early version that will be changed shortly with a mappable one.

    stronger spark, more adjustability on the curve and a crank trigger.
     
  14. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,792
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    I thought you were calculating for about 325 CRANK hp? This graph says you've got at least 337 rwhp, so more like 410 crank hp....with aleast another 40hp to go as you climb to 6800-7000 where the hp peak should be. That is a lot of hp and well over what you calculated for.

    If it's right, all I can say is WELL DONE!

    .....and watch the clutch, my stock type stuff (kevlar disc though) worked at 250 rw ft-lb, but fried in no time flat at 350 rw ft-lb...and you're right in that ball park
     
  15. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,445
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    mark,
    your right, i was calc'ing for crank HP. i've been up most of the night becouse i decided to have greek food for dinner. so i'm up by a bit ;0 i know the mystery will be solved as soon as i data log the pressure and rpm.

    the clutch is slipping a bit if i get on it hard, if i go gentle i'm alright. but it will be replaced along with a lighter flywheel. nicks got some nice units so i'll be going that route. it's a new stock clutch so we'll see how long it holds on. i don't clutch dump or run her hard around town due to the police presence and now i'm annoucing the way with the BOV! the pres (Bush) is coming to my neighbor hood (literally accross the street) on tuesday so it's pretty beefed up right now.
     
  16. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,445
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    went digging thru the book. speed to gear @ 6600rpm:

    1st = 37
    2nd = 56
    3rd = 78
    4th = 106
    5th = 139

    so that would explain the inability to use 3rd. we had to sync the rollers to the test gear. run and hold at 3k rpm in test gear. then start from a dead stop and short shift to 4th and run it from 25mph ~ 95mph. most of the top speeds were 92~97mph getting out before exceeding 100 was HARD! as it still rolls forward a bit.
     
  17. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,445
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    #17 smg2, Sep 30, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  18. Bandit

    Bandit Formula Junior

    Dec 21, 2003
    493
    Central MS
    Full Name:
    Mike B.
    How many HP is the CIS system good for? I would think at some point with the additional air flow from the supercharger that the AF metering plate would be at it's maximum travel and there would be no additional fuel flow available.

    Obviously you're not at that point yet or you would see the A/F ratio start to climb at the higher revs.

    edit, just saw the pictures

    That is a work of art. Very well done.
     
  19. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,445
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    not sure on HP but from talking to those in the know the CIS is good to somewhere between 15~20psi. WAY higher than i'd ever put thru a stock 308. the CIS we have was also used by Porsche on the turbo 911's, mercedes and saab. most any euro turbo car of the 80~85 yr range used the bosch CIS. so it really isn't anything new. it's just to keep the cost down. upgrading to a new EFI would get better results but also cost $$$$.
     
  20. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    very very nice dynos on a tidy installation!
    Looking forward to further developments!
     
  21. miketuason

    miketuason F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Feb 24, 2006
    15,831
    Cerritos, CA.
    Full Name:
    Mike
    Scott, will you have this kit available for us to purchase?
     
  22. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,445
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    yes this 'kit' is available for purchase thru nick forza. i'm still fine tuning the system to get the ignition set up right. and also currently awaiting the carbon fiber work for the air flow and intake.

    i thought i'd share the initial dyno numbers and how it's progressing, i should have it available by yr end. (fingers crossed) as the yr winds down it gets easier to get parts and shop time for the machining.
     
  23. blainewest

    blainewest Formula Junior

    Aug 26, 2005
    729
    Kelowna, BC
    Full Name:
    Blaine W
    Scott...325+ hp at the wheels? Very nice!
    Great Job. Do you expect this set up to have any negative impact on engine/tranny longevity? What is the approx. cost of this kit...without labor install?
     
  24. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,445
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    i don't forsee any negitive impact on the drivetrain, the power builds in a linear fashion as opposed to all at once. the components that would need to be upgraded would be the clutch and ignition system.

    not sure on final cost becouse i'm still not 100% done for the production end. and nick will be putting together the kits most likely combined with other components to make it a complete 'upgrade' and ofcourse there will be 'kits' that are less parts for those with some of those upgrades already. however i'll let nick handle the particulars of the kits. bottom line this will be affordable for the gains and cheaper than a turbo ;)
     
  25. NYCFERRARIS

    NYCFERRARIS Formula 3

    Mar 2, 2004
    1,011
    nice, very nice work...I see that this is for a 2v correct? will a QV be applicable...also what blower unit did you use, very nice rewarding work thanks for doing this and puttn' it out there. I tell you new life for the cheapest of the ferrari line 2v 308's and mondials..wowo
     

Share This Page