348 Plenum Redesign | Page 5 | FerrariChat

348 Plenum Redesign

Discussion in '348/355' started by vvassallo, Jan 31, 2013.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. fatbillybob

    fatbillybob Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner

    Aug 10, 2002
    29,262
    socal
    What would be cool for the obd2 crowd or even the 348 guys would be a motec and female plugs to match the Bosch males that go int the stock ECU. So you unplg the stock ECU plug in the motec to the stock harness. Pay all the games you want and plug in the stock ECU for the biannual smog check.
     
  2. SoCal1

    SoCal1 F1 Veteran
    Owner

    Jun 14, 2011
    8,636
    SoCal LA/OC/New Mexico
    Full Name:
    Tim Dee
    Thought the same thing then my head exploded. Parallel ignitions like those good old nascar boys do but a complete management system. See you in a week LOL


    Or use a stock ECU (nont connected to the engine) leave the OBD port and put a terminator with correct values just to trick the machine that the car "cycle ready"

    Hmm I get it can even be done without the ecu with just line voltages??????

    Going to have to read the signals on the OBD one day on a junk car for the same year to see whats there :)
     
  3. vvassallo

    vvassallo F1 Veteran

    Aug 4, 2006
    8,329
    Palos Verdes
    Full Name:
    Vince V
    I actually had a long discussion with Goth about this yesterday. The adapter plug, so FBB you and I think too much alike ;) The bottom line is we decided that for all the brain damage, you would still be better off just doing a piggy back system. It's far easier and more cost effective. After all, who is gonna pay someone to map all the pins on the 2 ECUs, then create a plug and a patch harness that adapts to a single Motec? You wouldn't want to run 2 Motecs because each is gonna cost you around $1600 to $2000 on eBay. It sounds cool, but a piggy back system gets you to the same destination alot cleaner and at much less cost.
     
  4. fatbillybob

    fatbillybob Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner

    Aug 10, 2002
    29,262
    socal
    I think the reason no one has used the piggyback fuel controller is that it won't work. PBFC work by tricking MAF settings or injector duty cycles. I doubt that there is enough headroom in the OEM injectors or the MAF to tell the ECU to do more. And if you put in bigger injectors they may negatively effect driveability when you are not wide open throttle. I could be wrong and hope so. I'm thinking if you do a PBFC it needs to act like an old school CIS warm-up fuel injector and spray a mixture just down stream of the MAF. The question then would be if the 348 intake manifold can flow a "wet" mixture.
     
  5. gothspeed

    gothspeed F1 World Champ

    May 26, 2006
    10,244
    U.S.A.
    Full Name:
    goth
    Well in that conversation what I suggested, was not actually a 'piggy back' but a completely independent ECU and injectors to manage the extra fuel only at those peak limits and remain off during the rest of the RPM range. But in general I really don't see a real need for it, on an otherwise stock 'base engine' 348. I have yet to see anyone 'truly' running out of fuel. As in:

    Making quite a bit more HP than before, then at that point, begin to go 'lean' at at the top of the RPM range. Simply going lean and making less HP than before, is a calibration issue and not because the fuel system is not capable of keeping up.

    The few times I have seen a 'mandatory' need for more fuel, was because of forced induction. IMO there are still many 'other' things on the 348 that need to be optimized, long before having any big concern of .... 'running out of fuel' ... :eek:
     
  6. SoCal1

    SoCal1 F1 Veteran
    Owner

    Jun 14, 2011
    8,636
    SoCal LA/OC/New Mexico
    Full Name:
    Tim Dee
    Some CAN BUS hacking can go a long way, some energetic folks are doing some really cool stuff. Hook your CAN interface module and start logging. We can copy Cambus and do things similar to an SD

    Possibilities are endless but for us with this simple ECU we replicate a stand alone OBD port that is self contained so when "read" will give the necessary info to pass the "test"
    Our era system only needs a few things to pass unlike the newer cars that send VIN etc to the system.
    Engine light off, ready cycle complete, power, rpm, speed. I am not 100% sure on speed or it thats off the dyno. an OBD terminator if you will.
    Now you can run a "well hidden" stand alone engine management system

    Then a long as a sniffer test passes were good to go every 2 years


    Endless possibilities if we think different from the past ways.

    :)
     
  7. vvassallo

    vvassallo F1 Veteran

    Aug 4, 2006
    8,329
    Palos Verdes
    Full Name:
    Vince V
    I get the additional ECU for the turbo application. Something needs to manage the extra boosted airflow. Maybe. We thought of maybe letting the stock ECU handle it by reacting to the changes introduced by additional fuel (adding 1 or 2 injectors per side behind the TBs or in the plenum) and air (from the turbo).

    My other thought is that I am not happy with the Motronic as an engine management tool. It is so outdated. Even a carbbed Vette engine can be retrofitted with a modern computer management system, and so many modern ECU cars can be tuned with more modern hardware and software. Our Motronic cars are denied this. This is where I was heading. A wholesale replacement of the Motronics, or a supplemental system.
     
  8. gothspeed

    gothspeed F1 World Champ

    May 26, 2006
    10,244
    U.S.A.
    Full Name:
    goth
    Yes, that is a great idea .......... though as you have mentioned, a suitable harness or cable interface seems to be the 'disconnect' in this conceptual idea ....... no pun intended ... ;)
     
  9. michael66899

    michael66899 Karting

    Jul 12, 2004
    120
    Bellingham
    Full Name:
    Michael
    Standalone is definitely the way to go, obviously the Motec units are excellent but the price is a little ridiculous especially considering all of the options the base unit does NOT come with, making you pay a premium for all the extras, no thanks.

    My current plan is to run a Vipec on my 348 turbo project, should have her up and running next spring. Just not sure if I'll try to retrofit some of the existing harness to come with with a PnP solution for you guys or just start from scratch...
     
  10. fatbillybob

    fatbillybob Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner

    Aug 10, 2002
    29,262
    socal
    Mental gymnastics aside I'm still real big on nitrous oxide for streetcars. 99.9% of the time you run within the normal envelope of the car. That 0.1% of the time you want some quickness you are breaking the law in just a few seconds so Nitrous is prefect. Under 1000 bucks for the best system and dial in 100-150 safe horsepower and smoke some 360's
     
  11. SoCal1

    SoCal1 F1 Veteran
    Owner

    Jun 14, 2011
    8,636
    SoCal LA/OC/New Mexico
    Full Name:
    Tim Dee
    #111 SoCal1, Nov 11, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017

    hehehe, so do we in our own special child way LOL

    :)
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  12. fatbillybob

    fatbillybob Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner

    Aug 10, 2002
    29,262
    socal
    Wow Tim you have been holding out on us. When to we get a tour?
     
  13. ernie

    ernie Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Nov 19, 2001
    22,620
    The Brickyard
    Full Name:
    The Bad Guy
    Hair dryers and laughing gas? Your a mad man Tim.
     
  14. SoCal1

    SoCal1 F1 Veteran
    Owner

    Jun 14, 2011
    8,636
    SoCal LA/OC/New Mexico
    Full Name:
    Tim Dee
    Were just get silly at the preschool LOL
     

Share This Page