355 throttle bodies on 348 project | Page 10 | FerrariChat

355 throttle bodies on 348 project

Discussion in '348/355' started by plugzit, Oct 22, 2006.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. plugzit

    plugzit F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 1, 2004
    7,794
    Redondo Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Bruce Bogart
    Apparently they work on different resistance. Goth?
     
  2. alfa156gtam

    alfa156gtam Rookie

    Jan 23, 2004
    1
    Hello,

    I have read through this very interesting thread, and I cannot remember if you used a wideband A/F to determine the A/F. If can do a WOT run from around 2000rpm to 7000rpm, then you can workout the percentage of fuel you need for No Doubt to add. I believe this piece of equipment will be a very useful investment for you.

    Also have you cross checked the fuel delivery limit of your injectors? Raising the fuel pressure may or may not be a good move. Stock motronic usually runs at around 43-45 psi? Raising the pressure by 20% will not give you 20% more flow, but only about 10%. If you raise it too much then there maybe issue with the injectors leaking.

    Currently what is the duty cycle of the injectors at max rpms at WOT (after the new chip you installed)?

    BTW, usually motronic injectors are of the high impedance type. You can just check the resistance component of the impedance by using an ohm meter. Chances are the F355's injectors are also high impedance. Usually the value is around 14 ohms (I cannot recall the exact value).

    I've installed an Autronic SMC EFI on my Alfa since 3-4 years ago and the wideband A/F meter has been very useful. However if you don't intend to run bigger cams or other radical modification, definitely stay with OEM.

    I apologize if this post is redundant and not useful.
     
  3. I.T. Guy

    I.T. Guy F1 World Champ

    Jul 17, 2004
    12,926
    Canada
    Full Name:
    Jason
    2) a) Injector open time reaches max and don't forget this is not 100% time it is only intake part of the rpm's in milliseconds
    b) Bigger injector brings worse driveability down low, smaller injector with more pressure can help this
    c) if you are close in injector sizing cheap way to step up a little or bridge the gap if the next injector up is way too large

    5) Not necessarily - you assume you added more air and won't know until you measure it somehow

    OEM with MAF reading should adjust everything for you. If you are still lean check injector pulsewidth and if they are maxed out increase fuel pressure or go with bigger injectors.

    If you are not using MAF and are only MAP then the fuel tables need to be redone, but also make sure you are not stuck in open loop when the MAF input is missing.
     
  4. plugzit

    plugzit F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 1, 2004
    7,794
    Redondo Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Bruce Bogart
  5. angelis

    angelis F1 Veteran
    Owner

    Jun 18, 2004
    6,400
    London, England
    Full Name:
    Sy
    Bruce, I noticed the two pieces of wood.

    Does the lid sit flush without them?
     
  6. plugzit

    plugzit F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 1, 2004
    7,794
    Redondo Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Bruce Bogart
    The wood spaces the deck lid up 1" for clearance. The pan that routes water onto the air cleaner box was removed, and the 45deg. fins on the air boxes were shortened about an inch. If I leave it like this, I'll make more attractive spacers, but the plan is for stacks, so clearance won't be an issue. The spacing is not obvious with the lid closed.
     
  7. fatbillybob

    fatbillybob Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner

    Aug 10, 2002
    29,277
    socal
    Pluzgit...where did you get the pantyhose air filters for the mafs? They aren't yours are they? Tell us the real story!
     
  8. fatbillybob

    fatbillybob Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner

    Aug 10, 2002
    29,277
    socal
    Jason is right on. Read his post again. MAF's may be the limit or the head to flow. This is a great project but maybe you are not what you think..lean. You need to meter this and not guess. He is also right on injectors. Call ron at RC engineering in Torrance and tell him you have injector 0280150731. Ask him the max fuel pressure that will take and the flow in CC/min. For comparison ask him the cc/min of the 355 inj 0280150449. Ask him the difference between the 348 and 355 inj#'s and you may find there is an impedence difference etc.. that is responsibe for the 355 no firing. Then you can ask whethere there is another injector with 355 specs that the 348 ecu will fire.
     
  9. No Doubt

    No Doubt Seven Time F1 World Champ

    May 21, 2005
    72,740
    Vegas+Alabama
    Full Name:
    Mr. Sideways
    #234 No Doubt, Jan 8, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Here's one view of a few of the maps that I changed for version 0.2 of the Stooge-Series chips.

    We're getting awfully close to maxing out what the injectors can do via software in this iteration.

    Even though I'm not there with Bruce's 348, I'd think that when he installs these chips tomorrow that he's going to see slower revving-up when at low RPMs. I'd also guess that he'll be close enough to a workable A/F ratio with this 2nd version of chips so that it will make sense to use a wideband O2 analyzer + G-tech to see where to go next.

    If more fuel is required then drive-ability is probably going to be better if the fuel pressure is raised, rather than pushing the software maps up any higher.

    I'm also wondering if he needs to go to a colder set of spark plugs for this mod.

    Version 0.1 took Bruce up +60hp from the stock chips. If his 348 will rev up with this new set, we may see that much again compounded...but I'd think that would still be far below the potential for this mod. Gotta bump up fuel pressure.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  10. plugzit

    plugzit F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 1, 2004
    7,794
    Redondo Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Bruce Bogart
    Ain't fat-must be lean. Separate symptoms.
    Excellent research-thanks for sharing it. I'll call tomorrow!
     
  11. plugzit

    plugzit F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 1, 2004
    7,794
    Redondo Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Bruce Bogart
    "Even though I'm not there with Bruce's 348, I'd think that when he installs these chips tomorrow that he's going to see slower revving-up when at low RPMs. I'd also guess that he'll be close enough to a workable A/F ratio with this 2nd version of chips so that it will make sense to use a wideband O2 analyzer + G-tech to see where to go next.

    If more fuel is required then drive-ability is probably going to be better if the fuel pressure is raised, rather than pushing the software maps up any higher.

    I'm also wondering if he needs to go to a colder set of spark plugs for this mod.

    Version 0.1 took Bruce up +60hp from the stock chips. If his 348 will rev up with this new set, we may see that much again compounded...but I'd think that would still be far below the potential for this mod. Gotta bump up fuel pressure."

    Well said, my man!
     
  12. fatbillybob

    fatbillybob Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner

    Aug 10, 2002
    29,277
    socal
    You ignored post 232
     
  13. No Doubt

    No Doubt Seven Time F1 World Champ

    May 21, 2005
    72,740
    Vegas+Alabama
    Full Name:
    Mr. Sideways

    Fat man! You know that he's not going to give you the skinny on the two young heiresses who donated their under-garments for the good of the Brotherhood!
     
  14. plugzit

    plugzit F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 1, 2004
    7,794
    Redondo Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Bruce Bogart
    Left at my house by a certain young lady I met on Craig's list. I will say no more about that.
     
  15. Andy hls

    Andy hls Formula Junior

    Dec 17, 2003
    653
    Kent UK
    Full Name:
    Andy
    Sorry i havent been much help on this guys,i think your faceing differant problems to the ones i had,as i dont use the maf sensors everything is run from the throttle position senser,my ecu is a programmable Omex unit and it only took a couple of hours to get the car to run properly,the hardest thing was getting the cold start right,with referance to a post much earlier i have standard valves and cam profiles and there has been no head work done the only porting was on the inlet manifold,i am running 348 injectors which i was worried about but its run great all year so i wont be changing them.
    Good luck

    andy.
     
  16. No Doubt

    No Doubt Seven Time F1 World Champ

    May 21, 2005
    72,740
    Vegas+Alabama
    Full Name:
    Mr. Sideways
    Perfect. Thanks, Andy. You're running the 2.5 injectors then as I recall, same as Bruce.

    No head work...which is pretty well what I had guessed since there was no mention of any head work for the 348 Competiziones that run 8 tb's.

    That makes me think that we can get Bruce running right entirely via the software maps in Motronic. Once we get the maps right I'll make them available for free to all other 348 Brothers who want to do this 8tb mod.

    Just to verify, you are at stock OEM 348 fuel pressure with 2.5 injectors, correct?

    No head work. OEM 348 cams. OEM 348 valves. 8 tb's. 400+ hp.
     
  17. plugzit

    plugzit F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 1, 2004
    7,794
    Redondo Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Bruce Bogart
    I love it when the voice of experience speaks.....thanks Andy
     
  18. ernie

    ernie Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Nov 19, 2001
    22,620
    The Brickyard
    Full Name:
    The Bad Guy
    Well it's about damn time Andy. You started all this madness with your fancy shmancy setup......ya big show off. :D

    This is good news, because if you are still running the stock injectors, we now know that they will handle the extra air.
     
  19. fatbillybob

    fatbillybob Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner

    Aug 10, 2002
    29,277
    socal
    What did you have to trade in return? O.K....I'll stop.
     
  20. plugzit

    plugzit F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 1, 2004
    7,794
    Redondo Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Bruce Bogart
    You mean does the lid flush **** without them?
     
  21. No Doubt

    No Doubt Seven Time F1 World Champ

    May 21, 2005
    72,740
    Vegas+Alabama
    Full Name:
    Mr. Sideways

    Got the new chips today, Bruce?
     
  22. plugzit

    plugzit F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 1, 2004
    7,794
    Redondo Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Bruce Bogart
    Nope. Stood outside waiting, too. Watched pot, etc. HOpefully tomorrow PM I'll have them and put them in. I'll give a report. Muchas gracias!
     
  23. plugzit

    plugzit F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 1, 2004
    7,794
    Redondo Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Bruce Bogart
    Stooge V2
    up 10% 0-4000
    up 20% 4000+
    235rwhp on FBB's g-meter vs 225 originally-in the plus zone now, and still lean!
     
  24. plugzit

    plugzit F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 1, 2004
    7,794
    Redondo Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Bruce Bogart
    Stooge V2
    up 10% 0-4000
    up 20% 4000+
    235rwhp on FBB's g-meter vs 225 originally-in the plus zone now, and still lean!
     
  25. No Doubt

    No Doubt Seven Time F1 World Champ

    May 21, 2005
    72,740
    Vegas+Alabama
    Full Name:
    Mr. Sideways

    Nice!

    OK, I've now mapped the OEM Motronic 2.5 tables to the Motronic 2.7 charts. This is important because I have identified all of the M2.7 tables as well as have run M2.7 through the 8052 emulator...

    So now I know what M2.5 is doing ("hey, about time I say").

    M 2.5 uses multiple tables to build a final Tj time for the injector pulses (built on 3 mapped components t1, t2, and t3). Stooge chips Versions 1 & 2 bumped up some 5 tables relating to t1.

    For the Stooge Version 3 chips I've already bumped up an entirely new table, that of the injector pulse time based on battery voltage (t3).

    On the OEM M2.5 and M2.7, the injectors are kept open longer when you have lower system voltage.

    Well, now Stooge V3 keeps the injectors open longer at the normal system voltages. It's a thing of beauty.


    Too bad that I'm going on vacation now, though. Gotta go do some snow skiing with some fellow tifosis...
     

Share This Page