400i A ignition problems | FerrariChat

400i A ignition problems

Discussion in '365 GT4 2+2/400/412' started by rovexienus, Aug 28, 2024.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. rovexienus

    rovexienus Formula Junior
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 10, 2010
    587
    Sainte Colombe, France (near Lyon)
    Full Name:
    Jean-Michel Savary
    I am starting a new thread on behalf of a friend, member of the F400 club, whose 400i A has developed a problem which seems related to the ignition system.

    First off, on this car the Dinoplex has been replaced by another unit before the car was acquired by my friend. Please refer to images of this unit in attachment.

    A few years after purchase, the car's engine started to run roughly, particularly when hot:
    Poor response below 2500 rpm (hesitations)
    Slightly better above 2500 rpm, but far from perfect.

    A first intervention occured in 2022, the Marelli BAE 202 B coil (suspected to be faulty) is replaced by new part Ferrari P/N 105452/A (in fact a Bosch 0 221 119 030). The engine ran a bit better after that.

    In 2023 the same problems occur again. Upon further inspection, the moving parts in the distribution unit are found to be kind of "loose".

    In 2024 the distributor is completely rebuilt by a specialist and installed in the engine. The subsequent road test is disappointing (no real improvement). The specialist then indicated that the Bosch part 0 221 119 030 (manufactured in Brazil) could be the source of the problem today. He had information of similar problems on a Porsche engine using that same coil which could develop problems when hot.

    The Bosch unit is then replaced by the original Marelli (BAE 202B) and all was better, but a full test is needed before any conclusions could be drawn.

    The full test will be run with the BAE 202B (presently on the engine) then with alternative coils (NGK 48302 and MSD Blaster 8222).

    The owner is left with the question of what type of coil should be used for the unit in his car.

    There are a number of threads on the ignition in this forum, plus at least one in the Technical Q&A:

    https://www.ferrarichat.com/forum/threads/bae-202b-ignition-coil-specifications.641824/

    I will report here the outcome of the full test when done. In the meantime I wanted to know if other members here have had a similar experience.

    Thanks in advance
    Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  2. SouthJersey400i

    SouthJersey400i Formula 3

    Mar 14, 2007
    1,674
    Romulus, NY (Finger Lakes)
    Full Name:
    Ken Battle
    Pictures indicate someone has been "playing" with the MSD system. Outside pic shows some corrosion around the main contacts. So, I would question integrity of the MSD unit. Coils are the easiest thing to change and test to eliminate that as the cause.

    On the other hand, the symptoms seem like the distributor could be the issue. Who did the rebuild? Where both bearings and lower seal all changed? Did they provide a final advance curve? Who installed the distributor back in the moor and did you check idle RPM and the advance curve vs. RPM at he flywheel?

    You have a witch hunt for sure. You may end up looking into the fuel system.....
    Ken
     
  3. raemin

    raemin Formula 3

    Jan 16, 2007
    2,291
    Lyon (FR)
    Full Name:
    R. Emin
    Strange that the box is labelled 104bk as BK was for carburated Ferraris, not ignition. So whoever built this alternative had the carburated cars in mind.

    If the guts is from an MSD unit, maybe it's toast (MSd recommends to add a big capacitor during installatuon in order to protect the unit).

    If the module is so-so the transition from multi-spark to single spark would explain why ignition is weak under a certain rpm range and better once the unit has less sparks to emit?
     
  4. rovexienus

    rovexienus Formula Junior
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 10, 2010
    587
    Sainte Colombe, France (near Lyon)
    Full Name:
    Jean-Michel Savary
    Thanks Ken, I am getting back to the owner for the details you have mentioned.



    Thank Raoul, same as for Ken, I am getting back to you after the answers.
     
  5. rovexienus

    rovexienus Formula Junior
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 10, 2010
    587
    Sainte Colombe, France (near Lyon)
    Full Name:
    Jean-Michel Savary
    More information from the owner:

    The injection system has ben entirely maintained at the time of the 2022 intervention, so for the time being it is not considered to be the main cause of the problem.

    The main contacts with the MSD unit have been cleaned after the pictures were taken.

    The HT ignition lead sets are new on both side as well as the distributor head.

    Immediately after the Bosch coil was installed in 2022, the car was behaving as expected (no problems at low RPM and frank acceleration at higher RPM).

    It is only one year after (at the time of Le Mans Classic 2023) that the problems started again. As par of the analysis at that time a brand new Marelli unit (purchased in Europe and not making noise, so presumably a unit with modern electronics inside) was put in place of the MSD and no improvement was detected then, which suggests that the MSD unit may not be the cause. The distribution unit became the principal suspect because of the moving parts situation inside.

    Recently the distribution unit was revamped by "La Clinique Centrale de l'Allumeur" (https://www.clinique-allumeur.com/), which benefits from a good reputation in France. The web page is in French but any browser can translate into English. All steps were made during the revamp including the bearings and the seal mentioned by Ken. The only step not yet done is checking the advance curve vs RPM at the flywheel after installation on the engine. The shop is the one which reported the issue with the Bosch coil not holding over time for Porsche engines (several Porsche owners had the problem with this very coil and the problem was solved after changing it with another type).

    After the revamped distributor was installed and the Marelli coil BAE 202B took the place of the Bosch coil, a road test was done where the car behaved as expected, however a sudden downpour of rain brought the test to a stop (the car is a cabriolet and it was in opened position at the time:(). This is the test that has to be done completely again under cold and hot conditions for the engine with different coils.

    The shop is remote from where the car is stationed (200 miles or so), it only had access to the distributor unit and its head.

    Question from the owner: should the multi sparking and single sparking scenario be further investigated? Or any other item?

    The shop (Clinique Centrale de l'Allumeur) has suggested - from its clients' experience - that the best coil for MSD unit is the MSD blaster 8222 for its resistance to vibrations and high temperatures. Would you agree with that?


    Thanks in advance.
     
  6. SouthJersey400i

    SouthJersey400i Formula 3

    Mar 14, 2007
    1,674
    Romulus, NY (Finger Lakes)
    Full Name:
    Ken Battle
    The Clinique has all the right tools. They may have kept a copy of the final advance curve; remember it is in cam RPM's not crank.

    I would use an MSD coil and ask them for their recommendation which is better.
    Ken
     
  7. samsaprunoff

    samsaprunoff F1 Rookie
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 8, 2004
    4,411
    Edmonton, AB Canada
    Full Name:
    Sam Saprunoff
    Good day Jean-Michel,

    I can fully appreciate the challenges to track down and remedy such as issue given the circumstances and that there has been a variety of attempts at trying different things in the hopes of resolving the problem. Unfortunately, I did not see a clear, systematic, an integrated diagnostic approach ... but more of a try this, replace that, test this, etc. As a result, it makes troubleshooting and identifying the problem(s) that much more difficult. I suspect that the distance between the owner and the shops is a factor as well.

    MSD units typically work the best with MSD Coils, simply because the MSD Coils have electrical characteristics that are better/tailored to work with the output switching characteristics of the MSD ignition modules. Although most understand the basics of ignition coils, most do not understand the core electrical parameters that differentiate one ignition coil from another (e.g. inductance, breakdown voltage, etc) and it is these parameters that can play a significant role in a properly working ignition system including long term reliability. Inductance is very important, as it determines how fast energy can be transferred to the coil... and so too much or too little inductance can affect the resulting output (high) voltage that is needed for the spark plugs. Inductance is directly related to the coils internal design, but also to the internal wiring (number of turns, wire diameter, etc). The other important factor is the high voltage insulating characteristics... This is also very critical, as the high voltage created by the coil has a tendency to want to "spark" inside of the coil instead of where it is needed.. at the spark plug. To stop the internal "sparking", various insulators are used which historically relied upon an oil which filled the insides of the coil (oils have now changed because of environmental laws). Over time these internal insulators "break down" and so lose their ability to properly insulate the high voltage spark... and so some energy is lost and/or intermittent output voltage is available for the spark plugs. There is a bunch more I can say about all this, but I think you get the picture. So... it would make the most sense to use the MSD coil with the MSD ignition module, as using a different vendor ignition coil may not be designed to accommodate the resulting MSD coil triggering output... which could lead to abnormal spark output and/or reduced reliability/longevity of the ignition coil. Remember that most ignition coils were designed to only accommodate a 12V input voltage, whereas the MSD outputs a much higher output.... and because of this the resulting ignition coils output voltage will be proportionately higher (2-3x than what the coil was designed to accommodate) and so could easily exceed the internal breakdown voltage (e.g. fails to adequately insulate the coil's internal high voltage) which can result in intermittent spark output and sorter lifetimes of these ignition coils.

    So... try the MSD coil and see if there are any changes... Good luck!

    Cheers,

    Sam
     
  8. raemin

    raemin Formula 3

    Jan 16, 2007
    2,291
    Lyon (FR)
    Full Name:
    R. Emin
    The BAE coil is meant to be triggered through one of its negative posts, whereas the MSD modulates the positive side. Not sure how the wiring was adjusted but let's hope this was done "properly".

    The guts of the ignition module seem small, I would say this is from a cheaper "street" MSD?

    Given what the owner has gone through, I would replace the MSD, the coil, install the recommended capacitor, and also replace the harness and eventually add a relay (current flows through the key switch).

    Once all this is done, the last point of failiure would be the distributor itself, but in this case I would be more than happy to test it on my Sun tester....
     
  9. raemin

    raemin Formula 3

    Jan 16, 2007
    2,291
    Lyon (FR)
    Full Name:
    R. Emin

Share This Page