550 v.s. 512

550 doesn't require engine out for belt change.

 

i assume you're talking about a 512TR, not a Boxer.

tough comparison to the 512TR. rather different cars - mid-engine vs. front-engine.

my understanding (fwiw) is that although the 550 doesn't require you to pop the engine for the major, the major is not materially less expensive since the newer parts are pricier.

doody.

 

I have owned both, and they are both great cars, but VERY different driving experiences. So it boils down to what you want in your Ferrari. For me personally, I despised the 550. Felt too much like a BMW or Mercedes coupe driving experience for me. I much prefer the mid-engine go-cart feel type car, than the big coupe feel. I sold the 550 after a year, so did not really get into many maintenance issues. Both great cars ........... you decide what you you want in a Ferrari.

 

I own a 512BB Carb, love the 512TR and M too, but I'd have a 550 over a TR or M... purely because it is such a drivable car while the TR/M are great... they're not "special" like a Carb Boxer (too many)... get a subtle colour 550 like silver or black, use it as an every day driver.

550 are cheaper to service over a 5 year daily driver term, than TR/M, but used as a toy they'd level out a bit.

I wouldn't hesitate to get a 550 if I had the dough.....

After the 288 GTO, they're the best car Ferrari have built IMO.

 

Get the 550....