747-8 First Flight | FerrariChat

747-8 First Flight

Discussion in 'Aviation Chat' started by Bob Parks, Feb 3, 2010.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    8,017
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    Monday is the initial opening of the first flight of the 747-8 as announced by the company. There is a web site but I don't know if it is public.
     
  2. Jedi

    Jedi Moderator
    Moderator Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Mar 18, 2008
    32,272
    Seattle Area
    Full Name:
    Dave
    Hi Bob - keep us posted if you hear anything...

    Jedi
     
  3. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    8,017
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    #3 Bob Parks, Feb 3, 2010
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2010
    Got the website. videowm.boeing/747-8/firstflight.htm
     
  4. Spasso

    Spasso F1 World Champ

    Feb 16, 2003
    14,656
    The fabulous PNW
    Full Name:
    Han Solo
  5. CRG125

    CRG125 F1 Rookie

    Feb 7, 2005
    2,637
    Los Angeles, Ca
    Full Name:
    Vivek
    When is the passenger version coming out?
     
  6. Jet-X

    Jet-X F1 Veteran

    Nov 2, 2003
    5,693
    Washington State
    Full Name:
    Brian
    Q4, 2011 - Lufthansa will get the first aircraft.
     
  7. Jeff Kennedy

    Jeff Kennedy F1 Veteran
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Oct 16, 2007
    6,847
    Edwardsville, IL
    Full Name:
    Jeff Kennedy
    Last I knew a couple have already been sold for VIP conversion.

    Jeff
     
  8. Tcar

    Tcar F1 Rookie

    Reportedly, the next Air Force 1's will be 747-8 versions.
     
  9. Jeff Kennedy

    Jeff Kennedy F1 Veteran
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Oct 16, 2007
    6,847
    Edwardsville, IL
    Full Name:
    Jeff Kennedy
    Absolutely no chance that they will let an Airbus win the selection process. Since both AF1 are already 747-200s going to the -8 is logical.

    A while back a public announcement was made about starting the process for doing the replacement AF1 then it suddenly went very quiet. AF1 is extremely political and trying to openly move forward with the process and getting congressional funding approval at this point in time would not play well as a public story. It will happen at some point but I would expect there will need to be a better economic environment and a better approval rating for POTUS.

    The new presidential helicopter program has already been killed although some more funding got thrown at it by congress.

    Jeff
     
  10. Jet-X

    Jet-X F1 Veteran

    Nov 2, 2003
    5,693
    Washington State
    Full Name:
    Brian
    They have - but they're based on the passenger, not the freighter, and LF is getting the initial deliveries.
     
  11. Jet-X

    Jet-X F1 Veteran

    Nov 2, 2003
    5,693
    Washington State
    Full Name:
    Brian
    Airbus would have to compete, and they've already said that they wouldn't enter that competition, not enough sales potential to warrant the hassles involved.
     
  12. Jeff Kennedy

    Jeff Kennedy F1 Veteran
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Oct 16, 2007
    6,847
    Edwardsville, IL
    Full Name:
    Jeff Kennedy
    I really want to see how the procurement process makes the justification for Boeing as the only choice/entry. Maybe Airbus will agree to make a quick response they know is going to lose if only so there is some sort of alleged competition.

    When there was a competition for the current 747 the other entrant was the MD-11. Told that the Air Force kept rewriting the performance specs until only the 747 could win. The Air Force had wanted the 747 as far back as when Reagan took office but knew they had to wait until Sen. Proxmire retired. As soon as he did, bingo, appropriations started going through for the new aircraft.

    Jeff
     
  13. Jet-X

    Jet-X F1 Veteran

    Nov 2, 2003
    5,693
    Washington State
    Full Name:
    Brian
    Doubtful - there's less protectionism going on now than back in the early days. Case in point, the tanker project. Airbus won it, everyone threw a fit. Yes, there were irregularities, but that doesn't mean that they can't and won't win again.
     
  14. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    8,017
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    Airbus didn't "win" the first shot at the tanker. They were given it after the RFP was changed mid-stream. Boeing was told that their 767 sized airplane would be proper and then changed the requirements to favor Airbus after the submittals were in. Boeing could have offered the 777 and beaten Airbus.
    The 747-8 flew today and will sew up the freighter business for Boeing.
    Switches
     
  15. Jet-X

    Jet-X F1 Veteran

    Nov 2, 2003
    5,693
    Washington State
    Full Name:
    Brian
    Boeing wouldn't have won with the 777 when the original RFP went out. They have nothing to demonstrate it as a tanker, whereas the 767 was already built for both Japan and Italy and flying (in test form) as a tanker. Same with the A330, they are building it and have a test platform for it for a number of countries. This is a separate discussion we could debate till we're blue in the face.

    We could argue that the 787 and A350 might be the better platforms, but given that a tanker would be so far down the road, neither would have a chance.

    And right now the 747-8 will not sew up the freighter business any time soon - there's a glut of 747s (both -400 Freighters as well as -400 passenger aircraft that can be converted into freighters) sitting in the desert. It's one reason Gugenheim Aviation cancelled their 747-8F order, because it was cheaper to buy the 747-400F sitting in the desert.

    All freighter companies are hurting, and some of the biggest movers of air freight are grounding their aircraft (747-400F/BCF).

    Time will tell.
     
  16. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    8,017
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    I was simply saying that any NEW freighter would most likely be a Boeing. Looks like any old freighter would most likely be a Boeing. The A330 is a fuel hog and from what I have been told by those who are in the USAF, the real issue is to get more booms in the air from any existing airbase not more bigger airplanes. BUT the politicians know better because it has to be built in their state no matter if it doesn't fit the requirements.
     
  17. JOEV

    JOEV F1 Rookie

    Aug 6, 2003
    2,827
    Ontario, Canada
    Full Name:
    Joe
  18. ralfabco

    ralfabco Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Mar 1, 2002
    28,029
    Dixie
    Full Name:
    Itamar Ben-Gvir

    Nothing like a screaming Boeing 707 taking off with the use of water injection.

    Except of course, a B-47 with Jato bottles !
     
  19. 1ual777

    1ual777 F1 Rookie

    Mar 21, 2006
    2,948
    Orange County, CA
    Did you notice the two 787's parked in the for ground about half-way thru the video?
     
  20. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    8,017
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    That measures airspeed from free airflow and is used to verify or dispute the systems readings on the aircraft.
     
  21. Gatorrari

    Gatorrari F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Feb 27, 2004
    16,464
    Georgia
    Full Name:
    Jim Pernikoff
    Interesting that Boeing's chase plane is a Lockheed product designed some 65 years ago.....
     
  22. Tcar

    Tcar F1 Rookie

    I mentioned that on the Dreamliner thread.

    Was told that Boeing acquired it when they picked up Lockheed Martin. Slow and reliable.
     
  23. Jet-X

    Jet-X F1 Veteran

    Nov 2, 2003
    5,693
    Washington State
    Full Name:
    Brian
    ?

    Lockheed-Martin is still a separate company, and in no way owned by Boeing.
     
  24. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    8,017
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    It is a calibrated instrument in the line ahead of the cone that gives true readings of static pressure apart from the aircraft's instruments giving the engineers a known base from which to calculate other readings, and other stuff of which I know nothing. This airplane is going to be a winner. Stay tuned and watch this " old technology".
    Switches
     

Share This Page