911 GT2 compression ratio | FerrariChat

911 GT2 compression ratio

Discussion in 'Porsche' started by rosso_fanatic, Jan 3, 2008.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. rosso_fanatic

    rosso_fanatic Formula Junior

    May 11, 2007
    339
    Long Beach
    Full Name:
    Wes
    I was just specing up a 911 GT2 for kicks and noticed that the compression ratio is only 9.0:1. My car has a higher compression ratio and only 87 octane is recommended. I thought that the compression ratio was the only aspect of the engine that determined what octane you needed but I cant imagine that Porsche would recommend anything less than premium for the top of their range. Any insight into this?
     
  2. FerrariF50lover

    FerrariF50lover Formula 3

    Aug 12, 2005
    2,383
    Ohio
    Full Name:
    Nate
    On a forced induction motor (ie. turbo or supercharger) the compression is lowered so more boost can be run on pump gas or a certain type of gas. Im sure theres some one who cant explain it better then me but thats the basic idea.
     
  3. AntonyR

    AntonyR F1 Veteran

    Apr 12, 2004
    5,426
    Los Angeles
    Full Name:
    Antony
    The lower the compression the more boost you can run at 91 octane. A car that is NA and running a 11.5:1 compression would also need a higher octane.

    On pump gas you could run about 20lbs of boost with a chip. If you get abigger turbo you would need bigger injectors but could run the same boost. The CFM's are a lot higher so more power.

    I raced with NA cars that had 12.5:1 compression and used c-16 race gas. I also ran with 7.0:1 and 26 lbs of boost with c-16


    Antony
     
  4. nthfinity

    nthfinity F1 Veteran

    Mar 21, 2005
    7,467
    South East MI
    Full Name:
    Isaac not Issac
    A Prius has a 13:1 compression ratio, and runs extra lean for "more economy" (and less reliability) that doesn't mean the Prius has a performance engine.

    A low compression modern engine would be like the 4.0 inline 6 in the old jeeps, which is only 9:1 as well.

    but, when comparing a high performance engine, compression means additional heat, but a longer burn, and a higher velocity "spring" action from the compressed air pushing the piston back down.

    The thing to worry about is something called "detonation" which happens when the heat of compression pre-ignites the fuel before the spark does, causing a loss of power, efficiency, and back fire etc.. This is why hi performance cars that are turbo, or supercharged often "pull timing" to prevent detonation when running on the track in 90 F temperatures.

    Porsche have tremendous street, and racing technology that they use. In the past, porsche used twin spark plugs per cylinder to aid in reducing the potential of detonation in turbocharged cars while they were still OHC 2 valves per cylinder... These days, Porsche have a computer management system that measures the potential for detonation ( cylinder head temperatures, and spark etc.) thus the CGT runs at 12:1 compression ratio.

    with a modern turbo/ supercharged car like what is in the 997 turbo, the car is actually running about 14:1 - 15:1 compression when "on boost" at full psi, that is why such cars are build as a low compression in the normal atmospheric conditions of 9:1.

    fuel octane has an effect on detonation as well. A higher octane has a slower burn, and avoids "knocking" which is "detonation" through requiring more energy in order to ignite ... a lower octane has a more explosive burn, and is easier to ignite.
    hope that helps
     
  5. AntonyR

    AntonyR F1 Veteran

    Apr 12, 2004
    5,426
    Los Angeles
    Full Name:
    Antony
    The fuel mapping and how well your car is able to keep the stoch 7.0:1 air/fuel ratio plays a part as well on the octane you use.
    If you think about diesel cars that run 5.0:1 compression with 35lbs of boost they have octane ratings of around 45. Then again they thrive on detonation to work

    Antony

    edit: Isaac kinda took that one lol
     
  6. nthfinity

    nthfinity F1 Veteran

    Mar 21, 2005
    7,467
    South East MI
    Full Name:
    Isaac not Issac
    No worries Anthony, I definitely don't know it perfect, and am always learning more :) .... I didn't even get into stoichiometry of a charged air car vs. normal aspiration...or thermal flow properties in 4 valve heads, or increasing exhaust velocity and intake velocity, or harmonic compression in the intake rams for tuning peak efficiency at a specific rpm range, piston design, not to mention cam duration and lift.... hehe, engines are wonderful things :)
     
  7. AntonyR

    AntonyR F1 Veteran

    Apr 12, 2004
    5,426
    Los Angeles
    Full Name:
    Antony
    I agree and was really happy I got to help build our engines. Learned a lot.

    Antony
     
  8. rosso_fanatic

    rosso_fanatic Formula Junior

    May 11, 2007
    339
    Long Beach
    Full Name:
    Wes
    Very cool. Thanks for the info guys. Hope that question wasnt to bone-headed.
     

Share This Page