Airplane physics question | Page 108 | FerrariChat

Airplane physics question

Discussion in 'Other Off Topic Forum' started by alanhenson, Dec 3, 2005.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

?

Does the plane fly?

  1. Yes

  2. No

  3. Question doesn't allow answer.

Multiple votes are allowed.
Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. tbakowsky

    tbakowsky F1 World Champ
    Consultant Professional Ferrari Technician

    Sep 18, 2002
    19,855
    The Cold North
    Full Name:
    Tom
    Maybe in this very long thread this has been answered. So why do we need runways?

    The amount of space that could be saved by installing massive treadmills instead of building these huge airports would be massive!!

    It would solve the housing problem by reducing the size of current airports and building houses on the property once occupied by runways..makes perfect sense? No?
     
  2. vincent355

    vincent355 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed

    Apr 8, 2003
    6,498
    Wine Country
    Full Name:
    Vincent
    Can't tell if you're serious? This should be fun.
     
  3. tbakowsky

    tbakowsky F1 World Champ
    Consultant Professional Ferrari Technician

    Sep 18, 2002
    19,855
    The Cold North
    Full Name:
    Tom
    For landings..ok..you need a runway. Take off? Why does an aircraft carrier use a catapult to launch jets. Vs just using a treadmill?
     
  4. Etcetera

    Etcetera Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 7, 2003
    23,746
    Full Name:
    C6H14O5
    Don't even need treadmills! We can put giant fans in front of planes. They will become airborne and won't need a large treadmill. I am genius!
     
  5. tbakowsky

    tbakowsky F1 World Champ
    Consultant Professional Ferrari Technician

    Sep 18, 2002
    19,855
    The Cold North
    Full Name:
    Tom
    That is a possibility actually....although the aircraft would end up in the fan..
     
    JM280z likes this.
  6. vincent355

    vincent355 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed

    Apr 8, 2003
    6,498
    Wine Country
    Full Name:
    Vincent
    If we're using the original question it has to be a long treadmill. A catapult assists the plane not the wheels. I guess if you could fix the tires to the runway and release them at the take off velocity, well then.... you'd have a catapult.
     
  7. vincent355

    vincent355 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed

    Apr 8, 2003
    6,498
    Wine Country
    Full Name:
    Vincent
    You could just mount the fan on the front of the plane and blow air over the wings!
     
  8. Etcetera

    Etcetera Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 7, 2003
    23,746
    Full Name:
    C6H14O5
    This....this could work.

    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  9. tbakowsky

    tbakowsky F1 World Champ
    Consultant Professional Ferrari Technician

    Sep 18, 2002
    19,855
    The Cold North
    Full Name:
    Tom
    That would mean the entire jet wheels included would have to out accelerate the speed of the treadmill. The question does not allow for that.
     
  10. tbakowsky

    tbakowsky F1 World Champ
    Consultant Professional Ferrari Technician

    Sep 18, 2002
    19,855
    The Cold North
    Full Name:
    Tom
    That was not a conveyor belt. That was a peice of canvas on the runway being pulled by a truck. Not a good experiment. When I think of a conveyor, I think of an assembly line type conveyor with rollers and bearings etc..
     
  11. vincent355

    vincent355 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed

    Apr 8, 2003
    6,498
    Wine Country
    Full Name:
    Vincent
    what if the wheels were frictionless skis and the conveyor belt kept up with them?
     
  12. tbakowsky

    tbakowsky F1 World Champ
    Consultant Professional Ferrari Technician

    Sep 18, 2002
    19,855
    The Cold North
    Full Name:
    Tom
    The plane wouldn't fly..no forward movement..no lift..the plane would be stationary..it can't push against anything ro produce forward movement in order to create lift..you need air resistance for lift..
     
    Island Time likes this.
  13. vincent355

    vincent355 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed

    Apr 8, 2003
    6,498
    Wine Country
    Full Name:
    Vincent
    The conveyor is not the ground. You can spin the wheels so fast that they don’t rotationally move telative to the ground but the shafts in the hubs will be moving relative to the ground/air. The plane moves. Move it fast enough and lift will occur. The system Could care less what the wheels are doing rotationally.
     
  14. tbakowsky

    tbakowsky F1 World Champ
    Consultant Professional Ferrari Technician

    Sep 18, 2002
    19,855
    The Cold North
    Full Name:
    Tom
    The question does not allow for the air craft to out accelerate the conveyer. The only way the plane takes flight is if its able to build negative pressure under the wings..without forward movement.. it cannot take off.
     
  15. vincent355

    vincent355 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed

    Apr 8, 2003
    6,498
    Wine Country
    Full Name:
    Vincent
    still doesnt matter. I just reread post 1
     
  16. INTMD8

    INTMD8 F1 Veteran
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Jun 10, 2007
    6,721
    Lake Villa IL
    LMAO
     
  17. tbakowsky

    tbakowsky F1 World Champ
    Consultant Professional Ferrari Technician

    Sep 18, 2002
    19,855
    The Cold North
    Full Name:
    Tom
    Explain why that is funny..so I understand.
     
  18. INTMD8

    INTMD8 F1 Veteran
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Jun 10, 2007
    6,721
    Lake Villa IL
    The entire post is funny. Mostly the part about being on a treadmill and having ski's means it can no longer produce thrust.
     
  19. tbakowsky

    tbakowsky F1 World Champ
    Consultant Professional Ferrari Technician

    Sep 18, 2002
    19,855
    The Cold North
    Full Name:
    Tom
    Maybe I'm reading too much into the question.

    In order for the plane to take flight..it must build up speed. That would mean it has to move faster than the conveyer speed in order to create lift.

    Seeing as the wheels are attached to the aircraft..and the aircraft needs those wheels to convert thrust to ground speed so the wings can do thier job..the aircraft must travel FASTER than the conveyer is moving.

    The question doesn't allow for that. It states the conveyer maintains the same speed of the aircraft at all times..if that is the case..the plane can't build ground speed..it would be stationary no matter what the engines are doing..because the forward movement of the wheels would be canceled by the opposite movement of the conveyer.

    If indeed the plane could take off from the treadmill.. there would be no need for a catapult system on an aircraft carrier..just install a treadmill on the ship and be done with it..it should work no?
     
  20. INTMD8

    INTMD8 F1 Veteran
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Jun 10, 2007
    6,721
    Lake Villa IL
    How is it an aircraft "needs those wheels to convert thrust to ground speed"?

    The wheels are doing nothing but holding the weight of the craft and allowing it to roll.

    As to your last question, I'm not sure if you are serious?

    A plane would be able to fly from the surface of a conveyor despite of it (as it is of little to no influence) not because of it.

    All of this has been discussed and there are ways of explaining it that meet the criteria of the question.

    Bottom line is, no matter how the question is worded, a conveyor is not capable of holding an aircraft stationary.
     
  21. tbakowsky

    tbakowsky F1 World Champ
    Consultant Professional Ferrari Technician

    Sep 18, 2002
    19,855
    The Cold North
    Full Name:
    Tom
    So you agree..at some point the aircraft must move faster than the conveyer..
     
  22. INTMD8

    INTMD8 F1 Veteran
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Jun 10, 2007
    6,721
    Lake Villa IL
    An aircraft needs to reach take off speed.

    Whether the conveyor is stationary, moving with the plane or moving against the plane is inconsequential.

    So in terms of the question as it was asked,no, it doesn't need to go faster than the conveyor, it just needs to reach take off speed.

    If that is for example, 100mph, the conveyor could match the planes acceleration, there would be zero aircraft wheel rotation and at the time of takeoff at 100mph the plane, tires and conveyor would match speed
     
  23. The Red Baron

    The Red Baron Formula 3

    Jan 3, 2005
    1,126
    Full Name:
    Warren
    Dont need a conveyer on the ship or runway for that matter.
    Just move the aircraft carrier or treadmill at 200 knots - 300 knots.
    No, one minute, here's a better solution:
    In fact the earth at the equator moves at approx 900 knots so we could just sit them on the ground at the equator and they will get airbourne by themselves.
    Obviously there is a lack of brains in this forum so it might work.
     
    tbakowsky and JM280z like this.
  24. JM280z

    JM280z Formula Junior

    Aug 22, 2020
    852
    Full Name:
    Jake
    Haha, well said. So funny when people think it would fly. Why not just put treadmills on an aircraft carrier and make it 1/10th the size…. (As you said)


    Sent from my iPhone using FerrariChat
     
    The Red Baron likes this.
  25. tbakowsky

    tbakowsky F1 World Champ
    Consultant Professional Ferrari Technician

    Sep 18, 2002
    19,855
    The Cold North
    Full Name:
    Tom
    Read post #2694..
     
    The Red Baron likes this.

Share This Page