Alfa Romeo 164LS "Sticky" Accelerator Issue | FerrariChat

Alfa Romeo 164LS "Sticky" Accelerator Issue

Discussion in 'Other Italian' started by Timo04, Mar 22, 2008.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Timo04

    Timo04 Karting

    Jul 2, 2007
    198
    S.F. Bay Area
    Full Name:
    Tim
    I am posting this question here because it seems that the AlfaBB is currently down, I am not able to log in nor even call it up using it's url.

    Last night while driving my 164LS to my girl friend's house, on our local 101 freeway just out of San Jose, Ca. I got into the the throttle a little bit to pass a herd of traffic, and brought the car up to just over 80mph. After I passed the traffic the car would not slow down in fact it kept accelerating!!!. I blipped the accelerator pedal again and again, checked to see if the cruise control was on (and it was not, I almost never use it).

    I took the next safe off ramp from the free-way and by this time I had the car slowed down to around 60mph by using the brakes. At the next safe area on the surface street off of the freeway I shut the ignition off, kept the car in gear, and then coasted for while to an acceptable safe speed. Then I turned the ignition back on and the car started right up without issue (without running the starter of course) and I drove the rest of the way on surface streets to my destination without any problems.

    On the way home the same exact thing happened again, when the car reaches speeds over 80mph the accelerator won't shut off even when lifting off the pedal, the pedal always moves freely. It behaves like the cruise control is activated except that it is not. I checked the carpeting in the foot well and there is nothing blocking or holding the pedal form it's free range of motion. All thoughts and advice as to what this problem can be are very welcome. Thanks in advance and have a Happy Easter weekend!
     
  2. Tifosi66

    Tifosi66 Formula 3

    Nov 30, 2004
    1,786
    Jiang Jia Jie
    Full Name:
    Li-Ge
    Open the hood. Check the throttle cable linkage near the throttle body. The cable tend to 'jump' out of the runners of the throttle switch thingymabob on the 12V models. Affix the cable to the runners if it's out and get a mechanic to adjust/tighten it. I'm not sure what is 164LS, is that a 24V or 12V?
     
  3. Timo04

    Timo04 Karting

    Jul 2, 2007
    198
    S.F. Bay Area
    Full Name:
    Tim

    Thanks so much Tifosi66 for the help/feedback! I will check the accelerator cable tomorrow during daylight hours. At any rate I was planning on taking the car in for regular service and to get the A/C recharged. BTW: The 164LS model has the 24 valve DOHC engine. Thanks again.
     
  4. F1tommy

    F1tommy F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 15, 2007
    11,544
    Sugar Grove USA
    Full Name:
    Tom Tanner
    I had that problem on my 12 valve 164's several times. It was the throttle.It was a manual so I would
    take it out of gear and the RPM would go up several thousand than slowly go back down.My LS 24 valve never did that.

    TT/SD
     
  5. Il Vecchio

    Il Vecchio F1 Rookie

    Dec 27, 2007
    2,573
    Near Pasadena, CA
    Full Name:
    Peter B.
    Yep, Simon's having server issues- I was able to log on for about 5 minutes, long enough to see his post. Good news is that he's going to move to a diffrent server next week, which will hopefully cure the "rolling blackouts".
     
  6. Timo04

    Timo04 Karting

    Jul 2, 2007
    198
    S.F. Bay Area
    Full Name:
    Tim
    The problem with the accelerator sticking open was a bad cable that evidently had been mis-routed and installed improperly from the factory. Replacement cables can be had from International Auto Parts (IAP) for about $12.00 plus shipping. I'm told that the 164LS automatic uses a different accelerator cable as compared with the other 164 models so there are at least two different cables available for 164's.

    Why is it that it seems the least expensive parts end up causing the highest risk to safety when they fail? Witness the 1986 space shuttle disaster, the failure of an "O ring" caused such a horrific end.
     

Share This Page