Alonso to Renault again? | Page 11 | FerrariChat

Alonso to Renault again?

Discussion in 'F1' started by TheMayor, Apr 16, 2017.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. P.Singhof

    P.Singhof F1 Rookie

    Apr 19, 2006
    4,819
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Full Name:
    Peter Singhof
    Does a Renault fit into their slim car or do they have to change their whole car? As Renault would not be their exclusive supplier they will not built an engine specific to their demands but their own. So parts of this chassis advantage might be gone with the Honda Engine as well?

    Gesendet von meinem SM-G930F mit Tapatalk
     
  2. hairy_scotsman

    hairy_scotsman Formula 3

    Apr 3, 2013
    1,134
    Austin, Tx.
    Full Name:
    Tim
    Re: The supposed $100M so many keep going on about ... When you consider how much McLaren are losing in multiple years of points payouts and sponsorship, and possibly in money lost due to damage to the McLaren brand, losing the Honda $$ probably wouldn't = a $100M loss to the bottom line.

    The difference in prize money between 4th and, say, 9th in the WCC is something like $40M, right? Someone who knows better can answer that one tho. And then there's damage to the roadcar brand. I don't know how to put a $ amount on that, but I'd bet a lot that someone at McLaren surely does.

    Honda is costing McLaren sponsorship. They desperately need more sponsors, but they aren't getting them riding in WCC P9.


    .
     
  3. Igor Ound

    Igor Ound F1 Veteran

    Sep 30, 2012
    8,102
    The Horn
    Full Name:
    Igor Ound
    Good, so Williams will get two crying babies...
     
  4. TheMayor

    TheMayor Ten Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 11, 2008
    106,070
    Vegas baby
    Brown is using valuable resources to give Alonso "perks" like Indy and a possible run at LeMans next year to try to keep him happy (along with this $40m /year salary that Honda pays half of).

    He never mentions when the McLaren chassis has a failure but backs Fernando in every outburst about the Honda engine. Yet he's the guy who is supposed to get sponsorship deals for the team? Isn't HONDA their biggest sponsor?

    Brown wants to keep Alonso at all costs. That includes the rest of the team.
     
  5. hairy_scotsman

    hairy_scotsman Formula 3

    Apr 3, 2013
    1,134
    Austin, Tx.
    Full Name:
    Tim
    Ridiculously simplistic take. He wants to keep Alonso because Alonso is one of the few sponsor draws he has left, and a big part of what made the Indy deal a good thing for the team was that it allowed McLaren to be more attractive to sponsors by gaining massive and much-needed exposure in a huge, different market. I remember reading somewhere that Brown said the team actually made money on the 500.
     
  6. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,641


    I won't argue with you about that bit.

    Zak Brown looks to me more interested in pushing McLaren as a sports car brand than just a F1 team. That's a departure from what Ron Dennis used to do.

    Zak Brown promoted Alonso's venture at Indy because it brought back the McLaren name at the brickyard.

    Now, with the imminent collapse of the LMP1 category in endurance (only Toyota left), Zak Brown has hinted that McLaren could participate at Le Mans in future if the rules were to be rewritten to mimic the IMSA series that allows DPI prototypes - they are cheaper than LMP1.

    In an article today in Motorsport, Zak Brown said McLaren would be interested in the top WEC category. Brown claims that the present LMP1 budgets are close to F1, so no incentive for manufacturers to participate. McLaren could be interested if it can sell the cars to private teams.

    McLaren thee-pronged attack (F1, Indy, Le Mans) would benefit the McLaren brand, and strengthen its image as a sports car company. That's maybe what Zak Brown has in mind, and on reflection possibly what he was recruited to do.
     
  7. subirg

    subirg F1 Rookie

    Dec 19, 2003
    4,369
    Cheshire
    I don't understand your point here. There is nothing for McLaren to 'work out' with Honda. Honda's engine is utterly rubbish. That is Honda's problem to fix, not McLaren's. If in McLaren's honest opinion, Honda are incapable of solving the issue, then McLaren needs to get a better engine partner. It's a simple as that. Dumping Alonso won't make their car any faster. Switching engine supplier will.
     
  8. Adrian Thompson

    Adrian Thompson Formula Junior

    Apr 28, 2004
    465
    Beverly Hills, Mi
    Full Name:
    Adrian Thompson
    #258 Adrian Thompson, Aug 31, 2017
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2017
    What did it cost McLaren to have Alonso at Indy this year?

    At Monaco Button had a 15 place grid penalty for an engine issue. That would have been applied to Alonso if he'd been there. No matter how good Alonso is (was?) he'd never had made the points. The Andretti car he was driving at Indy was sponsored by Chandon, NTT with Honda picking up most of the tab. His run at Indy no only garnered massive interest in the event, but for Alonso himself and McLaren as both a team and as a knock on their road cars.

    I see his Indy run as a massive BOOST to the team and the driver.

    What resources were squandered for this perk?

    P.S. I am in no way an Alonso fan or apologist. I can admire his ability, but his whining, his politics and willingness to throw teams (McLaren 07, Ferrari 14 and Honda now) under the bus mark him way way down on my personal list.
     
  9. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,641
    +1

    Honda has completely destroyed McLaren status as a top team and also ruined Alonso's career.

    To be honest, I wonder why it took 3 years for the issue to come to a crunch.

    It's like a bad marriage; you don't wait many years before filing for divorce.
     
  10. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,641

    I see the Indy "project" as an attempt to bring the McLaren brand back at Indy.

    I expect more of the same in future years.
     
  11. 4rePhill

    4rePhill F1 Veteran

    Oct 18, 2009
    8,254
    Worcester, England
    Full Name:
    Phill J
    +1

    There are three main aspects to a having a fast F1 car: The chassis, the power-unit, and the driver.

    At McLaren right now, two of those three are delivering what is required, whilst the third isn't, and Honda are the third part failing to deliver, yet again, for the 3rd year, and not Fernando!
     
  12. 375+

    375+ F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 28, 2005
    13,648
    +1 I am in complete agreement with both comments.
     
  13. TifosiUSA

    TifosiUSA F1 Veteran

    Nov 18, 2007
    8,468
    Kansas City, MO
    Full Name:
    DJ
    What are you talking about? I said they would welcome a NEW deal. Time for your meds
     
  14. TifosiUSA

    TifosiUSA F1 Veteran

    Nov 18, 2007
    8,468
    Kansas City, MO
    Full Name:
    DJ
    Weird take. Would you rather they dropped him and kept Honda? So you lose the best driver and keep the worst engine? Or keep the best driver and get a better engine with a switch to Renault?

    McLaren wipes their ass with the $$$$ it cost to run him in the Indy 500. Drop in the bucket. Hell at this point they are probably considering doing LeMans just to have a chance at winning something in order to boost the image of their brand again now that the stupid (and stupid expensive) hybrid LMP1 rules will likely be dropped
     
  15. nerofer

    nerofer F1 World Champ

    Mar 26, 2011
    12,083
    FRANCE
    Claire Williams:
    "I have been very surprised to read in the press about a possible association between Williams and Fernando Alonso; I deny this, there is nothing true in this, nothing has ever been discussed, nothing at all".

    Claire Williams dément la piste Alonso - F1i.com

    Rgds
     
  16. hairy_scotsman

    hairy_scotsman Formula 3

    Apr 3, 2013
    1,134
    Austin, Tx.
    Full Name:
    Tim
    +1.
     
  17. TheMayor

    TheMayor Ten Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 11, 2008
    106,070
    Vegas baby
    ABSOLUTELY.

    Alonso has at best 2 more really good years. If Honda can get their engine as good as RB next year McLaren would be better off with the Honda deal. MUCH better off. Same number of points BUT with FREE engines and WITH half of the drivers salaries paid, not too mention whatever else Honda is giving them on the technical and marketing side.

    And there's a change coming in the engines in a few years. All bets are off and Alonso will be long retired.

    Dumping Honda to keep Alonso is short sighted at BEST. You think he's not going to bad mouth the Renault engine next year????? Ask Max how much he likes what he gets from them.
     
  18. E60 M5

    E60 M5 Moderator
    Moderator Owner

    Jan 2, 2006
    8,165
    Wash DC area
    Full Name:
    Robert
    Thats not what they were reporting on NBC Sports during the SPA race with Hobo, Matchett and group.
     
  19. TifosiUSA

    TifosiUSA F1 Veteran

    Nov 18, 2007
    8,468
    Kansas City, MO
    Full Name:
    DJ
    Who says Honda will get it right with the next formula? Who says they would be willing to pay the salary of some random driver not named Fernando Alonso? Who says Alonso wouldn't be willing to take a pay cut to get different engines? Who says Alonso has 2 good years left? He has had zero drop off in form. Who says there isn't MEGA pressure from high ups in the company or the remaining sponsors the team still has to turn this around ASAP?

    You speak in absolutes but there are way too many questions about this. It's a complicated situation. I think McLaren has run out of patience and it is time to move on. This has failed. Now it is time to fix it.
     
  20. TifosiUSA

    TifosiUSA F1 Veteran

    Nov 18, 2007
    8,468
    Kansas City, MO
    Full Name:
    DJ
    so in F1 speak that means there have been talks
     
  21. TheMayor

    TheMayor Ten Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 11, 2008
    106,070
    Vegas baby
    #271 TheMayor, Aug 31, 2017
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2017
    Meh... drivers are SOOOOOOOOO overrated today. It's all about the machine.

    Alonso is not going to be driving forever. Honda will still be in business. In fact, if I were to guess which one would have the most possible improvement it would be HONDA who are completely embarrassed by the negative PR. They have the incentive. For Renault, just being there is enough.

    The Renault PU will not be better next year than the Honda. McLaren is throwing away free engines and $40M in cash with the hope they can win back sponsors and race money. Oh, and to keep their whining prima dona driver who bad mouths the suppliers in front of millions of people, even in Japan.

    Good luck with that one.

    Here's another thought.... McLaren has burned bridges with Ferrari, Mercedes, and now Honda. They are married with Renault now for a long time to come. You really think Honda will go back with them again?
     
  22. subirg

    subirg F1 Rookie

    Dec 19, 2003
    4,369
    Cheshire
    McLaren have already given Honda 3 years to create a competitive engine. They have failed. Monumentally. As a business man, there is no way I would give a failed supplier 3 years to sort their problems out. McLaren giving Honda 4 would be foolish and a wild punt in the dark.

    Renaults engine may not be perfect but it's already miles ahead of Hondas. Why do you believe Honda will suddenly leapfrog the entire grid and build the best engine for 2018? We thought that would happen last year and the year before but it didn't.

    You are perfectly entitled to hate Alonso as a driver. Many people do. But irrationally supporting Honda as a result makes no sense.
     
  23. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,641

    +1

    It's their business partner that's McLaren problem, nor their employee.

    Although ...

    Alonso will soon be out of the picture anyway, retured somewhere hot.
     
  24. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,641
    That's why I have suggested for McLaren to quit F1 altogether if a suitable and reliable and independent engine supplier cannot be found; call it FORCE MAJEURE.

    Mateschitz and Marko have hinted the same for the next formula post 2020.

    Liberty and the FIA better put their heads together and draw a sensible new engine formula and also think to finance an independent engine supplier not linked to a major manufacturer.

    Really, McLaren and Red Bull are in the same boat on that one, having no choice of supplier and forced to some sort of status quo for the next 3 years at least it seems.
     
  25. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,641

    Absolutely. It's the decision process at McLaren that I cannot understand.

    Granted, McLaren was in turmoil for at least 2 years with a palace revolution ending with Ron Dennis' departure, so no decision could be made.

    But now since there is a new management, why should they believe anything Honda tell them in terms of progress.

    In any kind of business, you cannot afford to suffer a dodgy supplier for 3 years, or expect it will come good next year. That's crazy management!!!
     

Share This Page