Are men necessary ?

Has anyone read this book or seen the media's take on this subject?

 

Why do I have a feeling that this is going to degenerate into a Venus thread?

 

I never understood this concept. Aren't we necessary to reproduce?

 

ROFLMFAO !!!!!!!!!!

 

Of course we're necessary! Women know that nobody else would worship them the way we do.
They wouldn't allow THAT to happen--trust me on this one.
Keith

 

LOLOLOL!
You'r right...

 

In case you haven't seen the book (I hadn't):

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0143058282/qid=1133852043/sr=2-2/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_2/102-9494245-2429751?s=books&v=glance&n=283155

Reviews are "mixed!" Seems to depend on the gender of the reviewer

As I said in another thread, only American women would be asking this question.

 

These two just may disagree with you!
Image Unavailable, Please Login

 

They'd still be cancelling out half their potential worshippers!
No way would they allow that...!

 

if it were not for us, who would they yell at? i mean really, it seems that is how they communicate to us.

 

Oh lord, more feminazi propaganda. Why doesn't someone write are women necessary? Why stop there, why not write are dog or cats necessary? None of us are necesary, the world will still turn with none of us on it. But men, women, or whatever species you are into are nice to have around if that's what you dig. Hang with whoever you chose too, the choice is yours, not some schmuck that writes a stupid book.

 

Poll 100 shepherds and see what you find!

 

Probably because men can't keep the species going without the other gender. Women on the otherhand, thanks to modern technology, can.

 

I didn't know you could create sperm in a lab. Women can't do it alone either. The whole disscussion is tarded, lol

 

You bet!!!
Image Unavailable, Please Login

 

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3700

And yes I know what the bottom of the article says. However it is possible to create sperm in the lab. As an aside all you need is a sperm-bank, not the men that produced it.


hm and one more, while the above article dates from 2003 and is probably more accurate this one from a gay parenting website says otherwise

http://www.proudparenting.com/page.cfm?Sectionid=65&typeofsite=storydetail&ID=126&storyset=yes

 

LMAO! Awesome...

 

Got a photobook of that stuff?

 

Yes but men were still needed to produce the stuff in the first place. God knows what kind of spawn you'd end up with using the technique in the article. If men were no more, once the supply at the banks ran out the species would die out. From that reasoning you don't need women either because you can create the fertized egg in a lab and have a monkey or something carry it. Like i said this is a retarded thread. I hate the racing off season.