Bad photography in Ferrari ads

Sun's out, weather's mild, both cars are happy. But, no worries, I found something to complain about.

I'm not an advocate of buying a car based on the photos, but there are some common things that irk me.

1a. Driver's seat bolster is a key wear point in any Ferrari -- so a photo that obscures that is enough to have me banging my head on the keyboard. What's the point? If the car moves, maybe park it so the sun glare doesn't fall right on that one spot. (See attached as an example. FYI, photo is from a top-notch dealer. I'm complaining about the photography, not impugning their honesty.)

1b. Photo of the passenger seat only: it's like passing around a photo of the back of a girl's head to the guy you're trying to set her up with.

2. No engine bay photo: These are Ferraris. Most prospective buyers are going to want to see the engine. You could argue that the engine is the whole point of a Ferrari. Maybe some guys don't know how the bonnet opens.

3. Red cars photographed in bright sun: they always look orange, or some other indeterminate color. If you're that bad a photographer, maybe just post a line drawing of the car.

4. Photos of the Ferrari badges/emblems all over the car: We get it. It's a Ferrari. Of all the major factors that go into the value/condition of a car for sale, the prettiness of the badges isn't a huge one. (Maybe locate the engine instead... see #2)

5. In-N-Out burger cup or bag in the car: we don't need a $500 concours detail job for the photos, but if you really can't be bothered to remove the fast food junk from the passenger seat it inspires less confidence in your initiative when it comes to tracking down odd noises from the engine bay or strange fluids under the car.
Image Unavailable, Please Login

 

Whatever makes you think that...

 

Too busy to compile a longer list...

 

+1

+1