Bottas to get 5 place grid penalty. | FerrariChat

Bottas to get 5 place grid penalty.

Discussion in 'F1' started by Jakuzzi, Jul 14, 2017.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Jakuzzi

    Jakuzzi Formula 3

    Mar 26, 2005
    2,132
    PR, TX, GV
    Full Name:
    Jaime
  2. TifosiUSA

    TifosiUSA F1 Veteran

    Nov 18, 2007
    8,468
    Kansas City, MO
    Full Name:
    DJ
    Every little bit helps.
     
  3. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,641
    Well, if it's like Baku, Bottas will pip Vettel in the last lap to finish second behind Hamilton.

    I'm just kidding ...
     
  4. Jakuzzi

    Jakuzzi Formula 3

    Mar 26, 2005
    2,132
    PR, TX, GV
    Full Name:
    Jaime
    :)
     
  5. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,714
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    Shame for Bottas but good for us. I expect a Ferrari double podium.
     
  6. ELP_JC

    ELP_JC Formula 3

    Dec 13, 2008
    1,264
    Not necessarily. The only thing better for us is Hamilton finishing behind Vettel, and with as many positions as possible. With Bottas further behind, it'd be much harder for him to slot between Vettel and Hamilton. We'll see. But if both Ferraris end up on the podium, it'd be better for the WCC for sure. We'll see;).
     
  7. daytona355

    daytona355 F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Mar 25, 2009
    12,655
    London
    Full Name:
    Sid Korshak
    WTF. What a shame, guess the brits are worried he will trounce their little ballerina again.
     
  8. Jack-the-lad

    Jack-the-lad Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    These grid penalties are ridiculous and detract from the sport. The driver should not be penalized for these mechanical changes. Deduct manufacturers' points (which they effectively do anyway) or something else, but stop these stupid grid penalties that unfairly hurt the drivers and, in my opinion, tarnish the WDC.
     
  9. JWeiss

    JWeiss F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Nov 18, 2010
    12,178
    NYC and Long Island, NY
    Full Name:
    JWeiss
    I consider Bottas and Hamilton to be equivalent enemies at this stage. I wouldn't root for either one over the other at any given race until (and if) one is well down in points.
     
  10. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,641
    I agree.

    Penalise the team, not the driver.
     
  11. TheMayor

    TheMayor Ten Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 11, 2008
    106,080
    Vegas baby
    I completely agree! Take them off team points but do not penalize the drivers.

    It's stupid.
     
  12. Jack-the-lad

    Jack-the-lad Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    And frankly, I don't think even the teams should be penalized over some artificial "cost saving" rules. It probably costs more to develop a (nearly) bulletproof gearbox than it does to just plug in a new or rebuilt one after two or three races.
     
  13. jgonzalesm6

    jgonzalesm6 Two Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Oct 31, 2016
    24,281
    Corpus Christi, Tx.
    Full Name:
    Joe R Gonzales
    +1
     
  14. ELP_JC

    ELP_JC Formula 3

    Dec 13, 2008
    1,264
    Me too in general, but right now, a VB/SV/LH podium would increase Vettel's lead 3 pts, whereas a LH/SV/VB would decrease it 7. But the better question is if MB will allow Bottas to finish above Hamilton if they can avoid it. And even if somehow it happens, with so much spread from 1st to 2nd, and so many races left, Vettel has to win some more races to have a shot at another WDC. I was disappointed to see PR1 results, but hopefully the difference will shrink by qualy. We'll need all the luck we can get, including reliability and rain. But it's time;).
     
  15. BMW.SauberF1Team

    BMW.SauberF1Team F1 World Champ

    Dec 4, 2004
    14,428
    FL
    That is a good idea in theory, but it would lead to teams intentionally taking the WCC points penalty by switching out parts to give an advantage to their driver to win races (and WDC) rather than making parts that last long enough at the expense of performance and never winning.

    I think they would all be okay throwing away WCC points if it meant their car would win the WDC and a ton of races with all the positive press and coverage that comes with that. Teams with big budgets could afford to replace everything and make cars that last 1 race and dominate. Who cares if they don't get the WCC? They'd win everything including the WDC and everyone would know they are the true WCC if it wasn't for technicalities.

    I think they should allow as much testing and parts changes as they want (I don't care about costs or small teams that will never win) or do the extreme and send people to the back of the grid for any parts change or illegal testing. Extreme ends, but it's better imo than these intermediate level penalties.
     
  16. Jakuzzi

    Jakuzzi Formula 3

    Mar 26, 2005
    2,132
    PR, TX, GV
    Full Name:
    Jaime
    Very true.
     
  17. TheMayor

    TheMayor Ten Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 11, 2008
    106,080
    Vegas baby
    Again true. This was put into place because the teams can't control their own costs. So they penalize them. But the truth is they spend the money anyway on making the engines and gearboxes bullet proof.

    I miss the days of a good ol' ka-Bloom! out the back. What would NASCAR be without 10 car crashes every race?

    Penalties for dumb things like gearbox changes hurt the fans. That's not a good thing.
     
  18. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,714
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    +1

    Back when it was simple....great noises, too!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMC1LwA_Y4Y

    200K engine failure. A fraction of the development cost, a fraction of component cost...far less complicated. Win Win Win.

    With continues engine development at the time, and more than 1 engine per weekend, teams where spending less on engines in the early 2000s than they do now!

    Madness.
     
  19. F2003-GA

    F2003-GA F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Nov 2, 2003
    13,375
    Sunbelt
    Full Name:
    Bro
    " guess the brits are worried '' and what are you FRENCH! :confused:
     
  20. Jack-the-lad

    Jack-the-lad Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Yes. The same mindset now pushes for cockpit protection as an over reaction to a death that the very same cockpit protection almost certainly would not have prevented anyway.

    Stupidity.
     
  21. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,714
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    If you can't stand his comments, why don't you block him?
     
  22. F2003-GA

    F2003-GA F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Nov 2, 2003
    13,375
    Sunbelt
    Full Name:
    Bro
    That would be no fun :) Sid's ok I just like to counter his claims
     
  23. daytona355

    daytona355 F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Mar 25, 2009
    12,655
    London
    Full Name:
    Sid Korshak
    Actually, just so you know, my heritage is Sicilian and English. However, I gravitate towards the US and all she stands for, and have no love whatsoever for England, I work hard to make things good for an emigration to Las Vegas. In the meantime, I don't know why people expect brits to all be fans of elton, cos many are not. There are far more followers of team, than driver, demonstrated by the tifosi of ferrari outnumbering just about any other fan base from manufacturer to driver at most, if not all GP
     

Share This Page