Briatore baffled by FIA verdict | FerrariChat

Briatore baffled by FIA verdict

Discussion in 'Other Racing' started by Formula 1, Jul 27, 2007.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Formula 1

    Formula 1 Formula 3

    Feb 20, 2005
    1,525
  2. senna21

    senna21 F1 Rookie

    Jul 2, 2004
    3,334
    Los Angeles, CA
    Full Name:
    Charles W
    I know I am. :confused:
     
  3. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,747
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    I love this line:
    "Besides, I too would have liked to know Ferrari's weight distribution..."

    I just don't see how you can have the info and not gain an advantage.
     
  4. bill365

    bill365 F1 Rookie

    Nov 3, 2003
    3,319
    Chicago area
    Full Name:
    Bill
    But of course, McLaren has not used this information.
     
  5. moretti

    moretti Five Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Nov 1, 2003
    59,757
    Australia
    Full Name:
    John
  6. 355

    355 F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    Jan 4, 2005
    3,643
    Toronto
    Full Name:
    Frank
  7. moretti

    moretti Five Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Nov 1, 2003
    59,757
    Australia
    Full Name:
    John
    #7 moretti, Jul 27, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  8. Ambassiatore

    Ambassiatore Formula Junior

    Jan 30, 2007
    926
    Full Name:
    David Figueredo T.
    ...you see?...even Flavio knows that even reading that kind of info in the bathroom is...glorious...only weight distribution will help!!!!
     
  9. Der Meister

    Der Meister Formula Junior

    Aug 16, 2005
    657
    Glendora/Prescott
    Full Name:
    Alan
    seems like there was more there than everyone thought... I find it hard to believe that they did not gain an advantage, after all the mercs were not doing too hot at the AUS GP but had a big resurgence 3 races in to the year...
     
  10. moretti

    moretti Five Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Nov 1, 2003
    59,757
    Australia
    Full Name:
    John
    from what JT says, and he has had many fights with the FIA long before he came to Ferrari, this was a most disgraceful ruling for the sanctioning body considering all the information presented.

    Lucifer has no integrity following the clarification ruling, Tifosi12 is right, McL can burn in hell :)
     
  11. 1_can_dream

    1_can_dream F1 Veteran

    Jan 7, 2006
    8,051
    Colorado
    Full Name:
    Kyle
    If everything Todt said in that statement is true and there was that much data being passed between Stepney and Coughlan and McLaren did know about it. I don't think McLaren should be on the race track for a while.
     
  12. moretti

    moretti Five Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Nov 1, 2003
    59,757
    Australia
    Full Name:
    John

    this is what was "reported" to have been said by JT

    I was once reported as saying ALL Ferrari owners have more than one Ferrari when what I actually said was most Ferrari owners have more than one car

    reporters, particularly the Fleet Street reporters, never let the truth get in the way of a good story
     
  13. LongJohnSilver

    LongJohnSilver Formula Junior

    Apr 15, 2006
    390
    Gainesville FL
    Full Name:
    Scott
    He is linking to an autosport article that quotes "a lengthy monologue released by Ferrari this afternoon, titled 'A reaction in the cold light of day' " So rest assured the words were finely crafted to mean what they say and say what they mean.
     
  14. moretti

    moretti Five Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Nov 1, 2003
    59,757
    Australia
    Full Name:
    John

    IF everything reported in the article is perfectly CORRECT and cannot be refuted by ANYONE then all this proves is that Ron Dennis is a deceitful lying scumbag that you wouldn't trust with you dog

    lesson here for the kiddies :

    NEVER MAKE A DEAL WITH THE DEVIL
     
  15. LongJohnSilver

    LongJohnSilver Formula Junior

    Apr 15, 2006
    390
    Gainesville FL
    Full Name:
    Scott
    I wouldn't go so far as to say that all the statements are 100% correct, just saying that all of the statements were in all likelihood made by JT. Whether or not they are his biased opinion is another matter; although most of it does seem to be statements of supposed fact.

    But yes, as you said, if all of this were completely correct, Mclaren has lost a lot of respect from me.
     
  16. senna21

    senna21 F1 Rookie

    Jul 2, 2004
    3,334
    Los Angeles, CA
    Full Name:
    Charles W
    So what he was saying is McLaren didn't use any of the information to improve their cars but used it to bust Ferrari on the 'Flexi-floor-boards' which were deemed illegal.

    In other words "McLaren got information on our car and then McLaren told the FIA about our cheating, as we were using an illegal floorboard system, they were whistle blowers. We're really p*ssed that we weren't able to continue to cheat as we would have been faster than the McLarens with that illegal floorboard. Instead we had to comply with the rules like everyone else."

    I suspect the FIA looked at both parties, Ferrari who were caught cheating and McLaren who were caught steeling, and basically said, OK guys it's a wash. We didn't dock you Ferrari any points for using the illegal floor, with which you won races, and so we're not going to dock McLaren any points for having the tech sheets as it was a Ferrari employee who sent the items to them.
     
  17. vroomgt

    vroomgt Formula 3

    Aug 23, 2004
    2,129
    Brisbane Australia
    Full Name:
    John ARBA
    Every element of an F1 car is at the margin of the rules.

    Mclaren effectively used stolen information to gain insight into something which was borderline.

    Without the benefit of this stolen information they would not have had a clue.

    It would be interesting to know who RD went to lunch with from the FAI when this matter was first broached.

    For sure an informal ruling was in RD's back pocket before his no infamous "Some teams.." statement.
     
  18. boxer frank

    boxer frank Karting

    Sep 30, 2004
    165
    toronto canada
    Full Name:
    FRANK
    great article 355

    very glad ferrari and todt are revealing alot more facts

    proves once and for all what a low life mister integrity ron dennis really is!!!!!

    somebody hack into mclarens and fia website and post that article so the truth be known
     
  19. LongJohnSilver

    LongJohnSilver Formula Junior

    Apr 15, 2006
    390
    Gainesville FL
    Full Name:
    Scott
    You have the floorboard row all wrong. The floors WERE NOT illegal. The FIA decided to make them illegal upon request for a rules clarification by Mclaren. This is why Ferrari was not docked points. The rule is not ex post facto. It cannot be applied to races that occurred before it was written. The FIA simply changed how they would test for floor flexibility, thus outlawing Ferrari's design. This same situation occurred last year with the mass dampers. It was determined that such a device would, from that point on, be considered a movable aerodynamic device. If their use was continued, this would be cheating, but no penalty was given for their earlier use. The situation also occurred in late 2003 when Ferrari and Bridgestone raised a question regarding Michelin's front tires. The tires would start their life cycle at the proper width, but through their use they would become wider, possible producing extra grip. The FIA responded by deciding to start measuring the width of the tires before and after the race. Michelin was forced to redesign the tires before the next race, but no penalty was given for their earlier use.

    Ferrari was not cheating. Mclaren were not whistle blowers. There was no wash.
     
  20. Brakefade

    Brakefade Formula Junior

    Apr 8, 2007
    306
    Los Angeles, CA
    Full Name:
    Luis

    IIRC the FIA changed the rule slightly at Melbourne which made the Ferrar floor illegal. So the floor was never used during any race.

    I can't wait for Monza!
     
  21. Dynamic

    Dynamic Rookie

    Mar 6, 2007
    11
    NY
    Full Name:
    Charlie
    My opinon of the matter is that there is absolutely no possibly way they could have disqualified McLaren from the championship. Think of what would happen if they had to drop out, there would be no competition. Who would watch a race, besides me, where Ferrari just absolutely dominates without any interference and a complete lack of challenge. Nick's only chance is if Massa black flags again.

    The F1 series is still a business.
     
  22. vroomgt

    vroomgt Formula 3

    Aug 23, 2004
    2,129
    Brisbane Australia
    Full Name:
    John ARBA

    In the "clarification request" McLaren pointed out to the FIA that some teams were running a "flexible floor" on their cars, a design strategy to improve performance. McLaren requested a rule clarification in March and the FIA subsequently revised the floor regulations after the season-opening Australian grand prix. Ferrari were one of the teams affected. The Scuderia's Kimi Raikkonen won in Australia but they were then beaten in Malaysia by Fernando Alonso for McLaren.

    Todt said last night: "Such information was in fact used to obtain an advantage over us, not through an improvement in their performance but instead through limiting ours."


    NOTHING was at that point illegal it was made illegal ipso facto!
     
  23. Remy Zero

    Remy Zero Two Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2005
    23,476
    KL, Malaysia
    Full Name:
    MC Cool Breeze

    :D
     
  24. FERRARI-TECH

    FERRARI-TECH Formula 3

    Nov 9, 2006
    1,677
    Los Angeles
    Full Name:
    Ferrari-tech
    "and hinting the Italian team could take further legal action against their rivals".
    JT quote.
    Which basically means if we cannot beat them to the title we will sue them out of it!!
    How did Ferrari and Mcl know about Renaults mass damper last year, and why did they only complain about it after they could not get it to work on their cars ??
    Why did Bridgestone not complain about Michelins tyres a couple years ago until after they realised they could not catch up in time.
    The list of this sort of thing goeson all the time in F1 always has and always will. Only difference is this time some one got caught withe their hand in the cookie jar.
    I could not be more against what Mclaren and the FIA have done to the sport, but I would like to see Ferrari act like men and say to the world , " look they have all our info and we still can beat them fair and square on the track".
    Either that or JT walks up to RD and punches him in the snout!
    Wayyyyyyyy to much politics for me !
     
  25. PhilNotHill

    PhilNotHill Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jul 3, 2006
    27,855
    Aspen CO 81611
    Full Name:
    FelipeNotMassa
    Excellent analysis. ;)
     

Share This Page