Change Fuel Injection from Testarossa to 512TR/M | FerrariChat

Change Fuel Injection from Testarossa to 512TR/M

Discussion in 'Boxers/TR/M' started by pv908, Nov 12, 2008.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. pv908

    pv908 Karting

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2004
    Messages:
    127
    Location:
    Sydney
    Full Name:
    Paul V
    Hi I have an 89 Testarossa, and am pondering the advantages of changing the Fuel Injection to the Motronic 2.7 used in the 512 TR or using if possible, the injection system used in the 512M.

    Has anyone done this and if so, did you notice a significant benefit. Was it difficult to do and get parts.

    My car is working well and I just replaced the standard injectors which increased performance slightly.

    Thanks

    PV908
     
  2. uzz32soarer

    uzz32soarer F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    Messages:
    3,090
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    Full Name:
    Robert Hayden
    It can be done and has been done, but remember the tricky things like cam angle sensors etc that will be required to run late model ECU which your car currently does not have.

    Very difficult and expensive.
     
  3. jratcliff

    jratcliff Formula 3

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,024
    Location:
    Texas
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  4. James_Woods

    James_Woods F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    May 17, 2006
    Messages:
    12,755
    Location:
    Dallas, Tx.
    Full Name:
    James K. Woods
    Very interesting - I had thought about this too. However, am I the only one who thinks that the original "square" airboxes are somehow a little better looking that the trapezoid shapes? Symmetry, perhaps?

    BTW, it has been a while since we discussed this - but what quantifiable difference was there in performance between the original U.S. single mirror cars, up to the 512TR, and then on to the M?
     
  5. jratcliff

    jratcliff Formula 3

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,024
    Location:
    Texas
    Hi James,
    Well my first thought was for performance. James (Norwoods Performance) and I both thought it was a better design and would have a smoother flow. I personally don't like the originals. I think they look clunky and kinda kluged (sp?) together. Just my opinion though. Performance wise it has been a big improvement, seat of the pants and dyno wise.

    I did this for a couple of reasons. First, I wanted to have the ignition system more manageable for future mods. I originally thought of doing a turbo mod, but have decided against it. I do continue to consider modding the engine in the future (cams, pistons, head work, etc.). Second, I never liked mechanical fuel injections.

    As for as the differences in models, I believe someone here wrote a fairly detailed comparison at one time.

    John
     
  6. James_Woods

    James_Woods F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    May 17, 2006
    Messages:
    12,755
    Location:
    Dallas, Tx.
    Full Name:
    James K. Woods
    So, the M had maybe 445 hp, and the 512TR at about 425 or so? And, I assume that this was mostly from induction breathing or maybe the cams?
     
  7. jratcliff

    jratcliff Formula 3

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,024
    Location:
    Texas
    Induction, cams, and higher compression.

    John
     
  8. WILLIAM H

    WILLIAM H Three Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    Messages:
    35,532
    Location:
    Victory Circle
    Full Name:
    HUBBSTER
    I have Motec on my 512TR race car as well and it does add a little more problem and is probably cheaper and better than the OE 512TR injection

    You could make some hp by insulating your intake, I imagine you would notice quite an improvement as your intake air is heated by the exhaust which is not ideal
     
  9. jratcliff

    jratcliff Formula 3

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,024
    Location:
    Texas
    I think you meant 'a little more power'? Guess the new baby have you dreaming. Congrats, I have to keep looking at my kids baby pictures to remember how cute they were as my 19 year old son tells me "your not cool".

    John
     
  10. WILLIAM H

    WILLIAM H Three Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    Messages:
    35,532
    Location:
    Victory Circle
    Full Name:
    HUBBSTER
    Yes, thats what I meant

    guess I'm still dazed
     
  11. Rifledriver

    Rifledriver Three Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    37,105
    Location:
    Cowboy Capitol of the World
    Full Name:
    Brian Crall
    You are thinking in terms of max power and is why so many just do not appreciate the real difference between TR and TR512. The 512 has more power and torque clear across the range. The difference in real world usable power and throttle response really needs to be experienced. And then there is the matter of the redesigned frame substantially improving rigidity. The drive unit was lowered to lower CG and the entire suspension was a redesign. There is just no comparison in the handling. The brakes are a huge improvement too. The interior of the 512 was done in house instead of at Pininfarina as the TR was so interior fit and quality was far better. They also did away with the stupid double disc clutch.

    Ferrari told us they made a mistake in making the car look like a TR even before they came out because early feedback showed them most thought it was just a facelift of TR. In fact it really was a different car. 512 was considered a commercial failure because so few felt the need to trade for a car that looked the same as the one they already had and sales never did as well as they should have.

    We have a TR and love it but if I had had the money I would have gotten a 512. It is a better car in every way.
     
  12. jratcliff

    jratcliff Formula 3

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,024
    Location:
    Texas
    I believe he was talking about hp only. I don't want to speak for him, but I was noting my hp improvement.

    John
     
  13. MannyGMT2

    MannyGMT2 Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    429
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    very nice... but where are the air filters located with this design?
     
  14. jratcliff

    jratcliff Formula 3

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,024
    Location:
    Texas
    There K&N's cones that go into the cavity behind the wheel well.

    John
     
  15. carguy

    carguy F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2002
    Messages:
    3,425
    Location:
    Alabama (was Mich.)
    Full Name:
    Jeff
    JRATCLIFF: I find your modifications absolutely fascinating! It's nice to see so much time and effort put into a Testarossa. I'm sure I speak for may other TR owners out there too! I would love to see and learn more about your car and what you have done to it. Very inspirational!
     
  16. jratcliff

    jratcliff Formula 3

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,024
    Location:
    Texas
    Thanks Jeff,
    I am going to document everything over the next couple of weeks. I really like the car and thought it needed some tweeks to make it even better. The one thing I wanted to do more than anything was to keep it reliable or even make it more so.

    John
     
  17. pv908

    pv908 Karting

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2004
    Messages:
    127
    Location:
    Sydney
    Full Name:
    Paul V
    Thanks for all the comments here, I guess no one has upgraded the fuel njection to the newer factory OEM gear.

    I heard that you would have to drill the 512TR injectors in, I was not sure if this was accurate or not.

    I just wanted to keep the car 100% with Ferrari parts as I thought the upgrade would be more compatable.

    Keep well
     
  18. James_Woods

    James_Woods F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    May 17, 2006
    Messages:
    12,755
    Location:
    Dallas, Tx.
    Full Name:
    James K. Woods
    OK then - but the old original single mirror is still the best looking.

    Just like that they never made a prettier Mustang than the 64 and 1/2.
     
  19. Steve Magnusson

    Steve Magnusson Two Time F1 World Champ Lifetime Rossa

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2001
    Messages:
    26,825
    Location:
    30°30'40" N 97°35'41" W (Texas)
    Full Name:
    Steve Magnusson
    Physically changing the injectors is really a more minor part of the change -- the bigger pieces are: 1) getting the fuel supply up to the injectors, and 2) getting the necessary sensors in place (airflow, rotational sensors, etc.).

    For John's modifications, I'd say it's more like he replaced the 512TR long block with the TR long block and then put the whole 512TR engine in his TR ;)
     
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2008
  20. jratcliff

    jratcliff Formula 3

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,024
    Location:
    Texas
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  21. jratcliff

    jratcliff Formula 3

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,024
    Location:
    Texas
    Took the bad boy on a high speed run on some of the best twisties around here. The outside temp about mid 60's and it was running really strong. I have to say it is really running better than I've ever had it. Now to some of the next mods.

    John
     

Share This Page