DARPA VTOL drone | FerrariChat

DARPA VTOL drone

Discussion in 'Aviation Chat' started by NYC Fred, Dec 30, 2015.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. MarkPDX

    MarkPDX F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Apr 21, 2003
    15,111
    Gulf Coast
    #2 MarkPDX, Dec 30, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  2. ArtS

    ArtS F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Nov 11, 2003
    13,414
    Central NJ
    That's exactly what came to mind.

    Regards,

    Art S.
     
  3. solofast

    solofast Formula 3

    Oct 8, 2007
    1,773
    Indianapolis
    A "tail sitter" makes sense for a drone, no pilot issues like noted above.. The advantage is that the aircraft can be a very efficient platform (long time on station) and much faster (quicker to get on station) in the normal flight mode and you can still land it in a small area (like the helo platform on a ship). The key gain is that you don't have the complexity of tilting rotors. Recall that Bell was pushing their "Eagle Eye" tilt rotor UAV a one time. That UAV was intended for Naval applications and actually did some shipboard trials, but it was a pretty complex system and not inexpensive by any means.

    What is interesting is that a friend of mine was the lead engineer on the original XV-15 (when he retired from BHTI he was given a plaque that called him the "Father of the Tilt rotor).. Several years after retirement from Bell he was pitching, for UAV's.... A tail sitter... So even the guy who basically was the father of the tilt rotor felt that a tail sitter was the way to go for a VTOL UAV.

    There is one downside, that is that the engine oiling system has to be capable of scavenging the sumps even when the engine is in the vertical position. Not a problem if the engine is designed for it in the first place, but it could be a show stopper if it wasn't. Interestingly, the engine for the Comanche (LHTEC T800) was actually designed for operation in either mode. Before Sikorsky won the Comanche, the Army wasn't sure if the aircraft would be a helicopter or a tilt rotor. But the engine development had to precede that decision, so the engine was designed for an operational envelope that included tilting to more than 110 degrees from the horizontal and the sumps were tested in a rig to verify that they would scavenge properly over the entire flight envelope.
     
  4. ndpendant

    ndpendant Formula Junior

    Jun 5, 2010
    636
    Chicago- west burbs
    Full Name:
    Paul
    #5 ndpendant, Dec 31, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017

Share This Page