Do F1 Cars Not Have Batteries? | FerrariChat
Buy

Do F1 Cars Not Have Batteries?

Discussion in 'F1' started by tuttebenne, Jun 27, 2012.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. tuttebenne

    tuttebenne F1 Rookie

    Mar 26, 2003
    3,218
    Bay Shore, NY
    Full Name:
    Andy
    #1 tuttebenne, Jun 27, 2012
    Has the current design eliminated a battery for storing some amount of electrical energy for the ignition and engine management systems? Since Grosjean's Lotus's DNF was blamed on a failed alternator, and there has been speculation that Vettel suffered it too, the nature of their sudden failure seems out of character with an alternator failure. Are the batteries so small that the cars have no capability to run any distance at all once the alternator fails, or is the alternator just another component that gets blamed when the team doesn't want to say what actually happened?
     
  2. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,714
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    #2 Bas, Jun 27, 2012
    apart from KERS, no battery to start up. Starter motors are heavy ;).

    I'm not sure what you mean with the size of the batteries that the cars can't drive any distance?
     
  3. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    #3 Fast_ian, Jun 27, 2012
    I could be very wrong :)eek:), but believe they carry just a tiny battery. The alternator keeps it charged in the usual fashion and it powers all the systems.

    Lose the alternator and it's just a matter of time until the battery goes flat and everything shuts down - Same as in the "real world" ;)

    I guess it's possible the alternator is directly powering everything, but their output is so unregulated I believe there's still a little battery there. (?)

    KERS is, currently at least, a completely separate system - It won't power the ECU's etc.

    I think......

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  4. HossB

    HossB Formula Junior

    Dec 5, 2005
    324
    DC
    Full Name:
    Ben
    #4 HossB, Jun 27, 2012
  5. tuttebenne

    tuttebenne F1 Rookie

    Mar 26, 2003
    3,218
    Bay Shore, NY
    Full Name:
    Andy
    #5 tuttebenne, Jun 27, 2012
    This is my thought as well. So if the alternator went south, the teams would know this through telemetry and would have been talking about it while the systems ran the tiny battery down until the voltage was too low to power the logic in the electronics. In a street car you have a good half hour or so before this happens but much much less in something like an F1 car with a tiny battery. If this were the case, one would think there might have been more notice than the sudden drop of RPMs in Grosjean's car, unless he had been driving around a lap or two after it had failed? You'd think they would pit and call it a day if that had happened rather than running it down until the engine quit. Just a thought.
     
  6. bobzdar

    bobzdar F1 Veteran

    Sep 22, 2008
    6,892
    Richmond
    Full Name:
    Pete
    #6 bobzdar, Jun 27, 2012
    I have a feeling it's not a couple of minutes but more like a couple of seconds before the battery dies. Red Bull said they saw the issue start during the safety car, but what are they going to do? Pit and retire or keep going and hope it comes back? In both cases, the drivers were in line for a podium so you don't just retire the car, you keep going and hope it fixes itself and if not, retire on track.
     
  7. Crawler

    Crawler F1 Veteran

    Jul 2, 2006
    5,018
    #7 Crawler, Jun 27, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 27, 2012
    I believe Ian to be correct :)eek:). A battery would act as a current stabilizer (kind of like a capacitor) between the alternator and electrical system. Unlike the battery in your car, which is larger than it needs to be in order to provide "Reserve Capacity" in the event of a charging failure, F1 car batteries are designed to be as compact and lightweight as possible, hence virtually no RC. When the alternator dies, so does everything else; probably within seconds.
     
  8. tuttebenne

    tuttebenne F1 Rookie

    Mar 26, 2003
    3,218
    Bay Shore, NY
    Full Name:
    Andy
    #8 tuttebenne, Jun 27, 2012
    Makes sense.
     
  9. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    #9 Fast_ian, Jun 27, 2012
    :)

    Dunno about "seconds", but I agree, it's going down fast.

    More significant however is to note that it doesn't need to be able to start the thing. Very few CCA's onboard! As an aside, FF all the way to F3 don't even have alternators - We just stuck a freshly charged battery in for the race and/or charged between sessions. IIRC, even F2 (back in the day) was the same way. Don't know if it's like that today, but it certainly used to be the case. [We didn't have any fancy-ass telemetry or radios either. Actually, we didn't have *any* telemetry! "Men were men" back then ;)]

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  10. Mitch Alsup

    Mitch Alsup F1 Veteran

    Nov 4, 2003
    9,724
    #10 Mitch Alsup, Jun 27, 2012
    The battery on an F1 car is more like a big capasitor, it can smooth out the A/C ripple from the alternator, and keep the system running for a few seconds (certainly less than a minute), but when the alternator goes, you better be in the last couple of turns in the race.....

    I suspect that Vettle's and GrossJean's alterntors got insufficient cooling durring the Safety Car incident.
     
  11. Axecent

    Axecent Formula 3

    Oct 15, 2008
    1,112
    Central Texas
    Full Name:
    John
    #11 Axecent, Jun 27, 2012
    Interesting failure in a total loss system (once the alternator failed). Considering the capacity of new technology battery systems, I am somewhat surprised the current draw and overall power requirements cannot be satisfied with a battery that weighs less than 2 pounds.
     
  12. NWaterfall

    NWaterfall Formula Junior

    Aug 2, 2009
    564
    The Track
    Full Name:
    Waterfall
    #12 NWaterfall, Jun 28, 2012
    Wasn't that the claimed reason for Lettuce dropping out in Valencia? I thought they said alternator failed
     
  13. TifosiUSA

    TifosiUSA F1 Veteran

    Nov 18, 2007
    8,468
    Kansas City, MO
    Full Name:
    DJ
    #13 TifosiUSA, Jun 28, 2012
    That was it, I believe.
     
  14. cheesey

    cheesey Formula 3

    Jun 23, 2011
    1,921
    #14 cheesey, Jun 28, 2012
    you are forgetting that the ignition is still electronic, at umpteen thousand revs per minute, those spark plugs require a lot of power to keep firing, which has the greatest appitite for power...the telemetry is probably is the next larger consumer, etc... the power requirement is large even if a large std capacity were to be used.
     
  15. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    #15 Fast_ian, Jun 28, 2012
    As noted in the OP. Also confirmed that Seb suffered the same fate. From Autosport;

    He goes on say they're continuing to look for the reason and will probably use a whole different batch at Silverstone.

    Cheers,
    Ian
    http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/100770
     
  16. freshmeat

    freshmeat F1 Veteran

    Aug 30, 2011
    7,284
    #16 freshmeat, Jun 28, 2012
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2012
    The Renault-supplied alternator failed on both the Lotus and Red Bull cars. I also read Petrov's alternator (also by Renault) failed in Monaco as well, so it must be a common design defect.

    I wonder what Kimi or Webber did differently in the races for it not to fail for them.
     
  17. Neonzapper

    Neonzapper F1 Rookie

    Oct 19, 2008
    2,580
    MD/FL/Philippines
    Full Name:
    Mykol
    #17 Neonzapper, Jun 28, 2012

Share This Page