F-50 vs. Murcielago

jim g · Apr 12, 2004

Tough to compare the F50 is way more money. I'd have loved one but not for a half million.

Juice It · Apr 12, 2004

Brian C. Stradale said:

Not fair? If you are comparing car marques based on cars from different generations, sure... it would be silly to say F is better than L because F50 is better than Murci.

But if you're thinking about buying either an F50 or a Murci, then its absolutely fair to compare them. Which is more appealing to you right now? To me, the F50 is way more appealing... even at its old age, it still outperforms the Murci... is waayyyy better looking... and has a good shot at appreciating rather than the depreciation you're sure to get from the Murci.

What are you supposed to do if not compare two cars? Flip a coin?
Click to expand...

I agree about comparing the two cars if those are the two you are choosing between but in this particular choice you are comparing a 750k car with a 300k car. That is hardly fair. Even so, I would think the cost of ownership of the F50 would be as much or more of any depreciation you would have on the Murci and performance is nearly exact.

RumorDude · Apr 12, 2004

Auraraptor said:

f50 is similar to a 355 feel, on steriods kinda like how the F40 is like a 328 feel on steriods.
Click to expand...

i dont know what f50 or 355 you drove but they dont feel remotely the same. the 355 is a water logged sponge compared to the rigidity, power and overall go-kart feel of the f50.

separately, I also get the feeling that the f50 is quite wide but its not suv (read: hummer) wide.

Conversations

Alerts

F-50 vs. Murcielago

jim g Formula Junior

Juice It F1 Rookie

RumorDude Formula Junior

Share This Page