F1 teams set to reject plans for 14 teams | FerrariChat

F1 teams set to reject plans for 14 teams

Discussion in 'F1' started by jknight, Oct 3, 2009.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. jknight

    jknight F1 Veteran

    Oct 30, 2004
    7,821
    Central Texas
    Hopefully one of the three will go by the wayside

    Carol

    autosport


    Formula 1 teams are set to reject plans to expand the grid to 14 teams next year - leaving the future of the BMW Sauber squad dependent on one of the sport's new entrants failing to make the 2010 grid.

    The subject of boosting the field beyond the current planned 13 slots is due to be discussed at a meeting of the Formula One Teams' Association (FOTA) at Suzuka on Sunday morning.

    And, with the matter theoretically requiring a change of the Concorde Agreement, only unanimous approval from outfits would allow the change that would guarantee BMW Sauber's slot for now.

    However, team principal Frank Williams has made it clear that his team will block any move to allow a 14th team in.

    "I will be repeating what I said - one: that there should only be 13 teams, that's what there always has been and two: that I would suggest they apply to be first reserve," Williams told AUTOSPORT.

    "That's the logical thing to do. It's illogical to change the rules suddenly for one extra person. And they may have a chance of getting in based on the gossip that's going around. Who knows?"

    Williams says that part of the reluctance to allow BMW Sauber an automatic entry as the 14th slot is because there is such uncertainty about the identity of its new owners – investment group Qadbak.

    The mysterious organisation has already been the subject of controversy in Britain with its involvement in Notts County Football Club being the subject of an inquiry by the Football Association.

    Williams added: "If this was Ferrari somehow retired halfway through a year and wanted to come back we'd find a way to bend the rules. But this is a team that is owned by someone, we don't know who they are, their long-term plans. They bought Notts County and the FA... what did they say? We're not at all happy until we know who the owners are and their long-term plans. We would like to know."

    McLaren team principal Martin Whitmarsh believes that any decision to block the 14th entry would not mean automatically mean that BMW Sauber is out – because he has doubts that all the new teams will make it.

    "What FOTA is concerned about is we're having an artificial debate because the strong suspicion is that there will not be 14 teams, and there may even be less than 13," he explained.

    "As a pragmatist, it gives clarity to Sauber and it would be right to agree to there being 14 teams in the event that after you've agreed one of them should drop out and then the number will be smaller. I think 14 teams is too many, but I personally would agree to supporting Sauber. One because they deserve it and two because I don't think there will be 14 teams anyway."

    BMW Sauber team principal Mario Theissen said he was waiting for the outcome of the FOTA meeting before deciding on the next step.

    When asked to comment on reports that many people believe there will not be a 14th team, Theissen said: "Yes, that's a common guess but it doesn't really help. We need confirmation."
     
  2. Wolfgang5150

    Wolfgang5150 F1 Rookie

    Oct 31, 2003
    4,706
    How lame. There should be no limit on the amount of teams; plus who cares about the Qatar ownership? F1 isn't exactly known for attracting moral characters....Frank should develop a car that can beat Sauber instead of keeping him off the grid...
     
  3. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,692
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    IMO Frank may be holding out for a "consideration".
    He's running on what passes for a shoestring in F1 terms at a time where sponsor dollars are scarce and I can't blame him for trying to maximize his position.
     
  4. Latsyrc

    Latsyrc F1 Rookie

    Jun 23, 2008
    2,798
    Utah, USA
    Full Name:
    Travis
    I'm all for having a bigger field (24hrs of the Ring anybody? :) ) and hope to see more teams be able to join. Plus, they would have more teams to impose fines on! :)
     
  5. Remy Zero

    Remy Zero Two Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2005
    23,476
    KL, Malaysia
    Full Name:
    MC Cool Breeze
    I really think that Frank Williams is just a sore loser. Everything or any suggestion made by anyone, and Frank will be the 1st one to 'block' out that idea.
     
  6. Modena360-66

    Modena360-66 Formula Junior

    Sep 25, 2007
    873
    Perpignan, France
    Full Name:
    Nathan
    I would have guessed it was williams even before reading the paper....
     
  7. Simon^2

    Simon^2 F1 World Champ

    Oct 17, 2005
    12,313
    At Sea Level
    I agree with Frank. F1 is a business. Why let a new team in for free. That carves up the event money / TV money / and sponsor money into smaller peices. Why would he agree to that.

    Lets face it... Sauber-DuJour.F1Team will be on the grid as 1 of 13 (or less) teams because the odds of all 3 new teams being ready is slim.
     
  8. brian.s

    brian.s F1 Rookie
    Professional Ferrari Technician

    Nov 3, 2003
    3,809
    Midwest
    Full Name:
    Brian
    There have been many 'has been' or embarassing teams show up in the past. The whole Bernie effect was to streamline the show and get rid of those wanna be's.

    Remember the Life team? Or Andrea-Moda? What fun is it seeing anything like that again?

    That's why they have the IRL!
     
  9. TheMayor

    TheMayor Ten Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 11, 2008
    106,532
    Vegas baby
    Just bring back the old 7% qualifying rule. You'll see a lot of the new teams struggle to get into the first round of qualifying. End of problem.
     

Share This Page