Falcon 8X performance at Death Valley's Star Wars Canyon | FerrariChat

Falcon 8X performance at Death Valley's Star Wars Canyon

Discussion in 'Aviation Chat' started by WilyB, Apr 6, 2022.

Tags:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. WilyB

    WilyB F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 23, 2007
    4,272
    AZ
    Nice video.

     
    Jacob Potts and Bisonte like this.
  2. tritone

    tritone F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 8, 2003
    7,199
    On the Rock
    Full Name:
    James
    I can just imagine the waiting list for flight clearance there.......and given all the mil spec stuff we see, is there a minimum speed limit? :cool: Would my dads V35 have qualified?
     
    nmcclure and bspellerin like this.
  3. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    8,017
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    I can't imagine how much fun that is!
     
    Jacob Potts, WilyB and Bisonte like this.
  4. ChipG

    ChipG Formula 3

    May 26, 2011
    1,760
    Santa Monica, CA
    This is more impressive IMOP:
     
    WilyB and Bisonte like this.
  5. donv

    donv Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 5, 2002
    26,107
    Portland, Oregon
    Full Name:
    Don
    I miss flying Falcons!
     
    Jacob Potts and WilyB like this.
  6. Bisonte

    Bisonte F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed

    Mar 27, 2007
    8,694
    Northern Virginia
    Full Name:
    Greg
    Very cool, and they're both impressive for different reasons.
     
    WilyB and ChipG like this.
  7. donv

    donv Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 5, 2002
    26,107
    Portland, Oregon
    Full Name:
    Don
    My last trip in the Falcon 50 was to SMO... before the shortened the runway.

    Also, while that trip is impressive, the runway at SMO isn't really 3500 feet. Really there is 5000 feet of pavement there, which at 3500 feet gives you about 750 feet of overrun at each end-- on pavement that used to be a runway. While sure, you aren't supposed to use that, it does reduce the stress quite a bit.
     
    Bisonte likes this.
  8. ChipG

    ChipG Formula 3

    May 26, 2011
    1,760
    Santa Monica, CA
    They jackhammered and removed the extra pavement a couple years ago, there still is a flacon 50 there, I think it's the Snap Chat founder Evan S but it breaks the noise restriction every time.

    https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2019-07-08/runway-removal-commence-smo
     

    Attached Files:

    Jacob Potts and Bisonte like this.
  9. donv

    donv Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 5, 2002
    26,107
    Portland, Oregon
    Full Name:
    Don
    I guess there is less overrun there than I thought... from the Jepp chart, it looked like there was about 5000' of pavement.

    They must have tightened the noise requirements, because the Falcon 50 used to not be an issue there. The displaced threshold actually helps, as you used to have to wait to push the power up for a few moments to avoid triggering the sensor at the end of the runway.

    No mention of whether the 8X triggered the sensors or not, although they did their best to comply with the restrictions.
     
  10. ChipG

    ChipG Formula 3

    May 26, 2011
    1,760
    Santa Monica, CA

    just curious, how much or little fuel can a 50 take and still get off the ground in 3500 feet on a standard temp day?
     
  11. donv

    donv Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 5, 2002
    26,107
    Portland, Oregon
    Full Name:
    Don
    On a standard day, you could depart at about 33,000 pounds. On a 70 degree day (more realistic at SMO), you could depart at about 32,500. I think basic operating weight on the 50s I used to fly was around 22,000 pounds (this was a long time ago, so apologies if I'm off on that), so you could carry about 11,000 pounds of fuel with no pax, or figure maybe 10,000 pounds with 5 pax.

    As I recall, that would give you 4 hours pretty easily with decent reserves, maybe a bit more. TEB might be a little tight, but anywhere west of the Mississippi would be no big deal.
     
    ChipG likes this.
  12. donv

    donv Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 5, 2002
    26,107
    Portland, Oregon
    Full Name:
    Don
    On further thought, if you slowed down a little (M.76 versus M.80), had a reasonable tailwind, and were willing to reduce the fuel reserve a bit, I think TEB would be entirely reasonable about 60-70% of the time.
     

Share This Page