Falcon Heavy 2 boosters landing 02/06/08 in HD | FerrariChat

Falcon Heavy 2 boosters landing 02/06/08 in HD

Discussion in 'Aviation Chat' started by jgonzalesm6, Feb 7, 2018.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. jgonzalesm6

    jgonzalesm6 Two Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Oct 31, 2016
    24,281
    Corpus Christi, Tx.
    Full Name:
    Joe R Gonzales
    This video shows the two boosters (falling and hauling butt) and then landing. It's amazing. Widen the screen from youtube so it takes up the whole screen. Then two LOUD sonic booms (28sec) after the boosters ignite for landing.

    FALCON HEAVY LANDING 02/06/2018 (1min 2sec)

     
    u2driver likes this.
  2. BMW.SauberF1Team

    BMW.SauberF1Team F1 World Champ

    Dec 4, 2004
    14,428
    FL
    I wish I was there to hear the booms in person. Last time I've ever heard sonic booms over the cape was nearly a decade ago when the shuttle flew.

    Watching both those boosters land in unison was surreal. The entire launch and landing felt like science fiction and I'm glad I had the opportunity to see something incredible like that in my lifetime.
     
    u2driver and jgonzalesm6 like this.
  3. tazandjan

    tazandjan Three Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Jul 19, 2008
    39,163
    Clarksville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    Terry H Phillips
    The center booster was even more spectacular, mainly because it missed the barge so the result was a very large splash. If they could have pulled off all three, it would have been really amazing, instead on just plain amazing. The two outside boosters dropped off earlier at a lower Mach number and closer to lift-off location. The center booster went higher, faster, and further downrange, so could not make it back to recover on land.
     
    u2driver and jgonzalesm6 like this.
  4. Tcar

    Tcar F1 Rookie

    Heard the center booster just didn't have enough fuel to stick the landing... miscalculation.
     
  5. F1tommy

    F1tommy F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 15, 2007
    11,485
    Sugar Grove USA
    Full Name:
    Tom Tanner
    Good to see, and impressive landing. Maybe this will get people more interested in the space program again.
     
    u2driver likes this.
  6. tazandjan

    tazandjan Three Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Jul 19, 2008
    39,163
    Clarksville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    Terry H Phillips
    Probably good the center booster mostly missed the barge (did damage 2 thrusters and fragged the barge). She was doing 300 knots when she hit the water. Would likely have sunk the barge with a direct hit.

    DARPA's and Boeing's Experimental Spaceplane (XSP) program is progressing nicely towards 2020 demo flights. Fully reusable booster with ~Mach 10 capability using an expendable upper stage.
     
  7. SVCalifornia

    SVCalifornia F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed

    Mar 28, 2011
    2,569
    Silicon Valley
    Full Name:
    Keith
    So center booster burned too long?? That why the space car ended up in the wrong orbit??

    SV
     
  8. mike01606

    mike01606 Formula Junior

    Feb 21, 2012
    794
    Cheshire UK
    Full Name:
    Mike M
    I wonder if they had any control over it a ditched it once they knew the couldn’t recover it?
    The drone barge camera picked something up then cut out so it was very close!

    Awesome launch though......
     
  9. BMW.SauberF1Team

    BMW.SauberF1Team F1 World Champ

    Dec 4, 2004
    14,428
    FL
    #9 BMW.SauberF1Team, Feb 8, 2018
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2018
    Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the center booster is completely separate from that third burn (utilizing re-fire of the second stage) while in earth's orbit. The center booster provided lift to help (but not entirely) get into orbit and then detached and landed back in the Atlantic near the barge.

    I think there were two separate miscalculations/mishaps that happened. The first being not enough of the center booster engines reignited to land (only 1 of 3 engines necessary came back on). Therefore it could not slow down appropriately. The second mishap was the third burn (of the second stage) while in earth's orbit was for too long and sent it off its mars orbit. Hopefully that doesn't happen when we try to send people to Mars...

    First stage: 3 boosters (27 engines). Two side boosters successfully returned to the Cape. The center failed to land on the barge off coast.
    Second stage (1 engine): Gets the into orbit. Successful.
    Second stage+: Re-ignition of that second stage single engine to get into deep space. Overshot mars orbit.

    http://www.spacex.com/falcon-heavy
     
  10. tazandjan

    tazandjan Three Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Jul 19, 2008
    39,163
    Clarksville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    Terry H Phillips
    The center booster had more fuel than the two outer boosters and burned longer to a higher Mach number. We see the same thing on Falcon 9 recoveries. Those boosters going into low energy orbits (and/or with smaller payloads) are able to return to launch site (RTLS). The ones involved in higher energy orbits are too far away at MECO to RTLS and recover to a barge further out in the ocean. They screwed up the calculation of propellant required on the center stage or burned too long, so she was effectively in free fall during the last part of the recovery.
     
  11. SVCalifornia

    SVCalifornia F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed

    Mar 28, 2011
    2,569
    Silicon Valley
    Full Name:
    Keith
    I’ve read two different explanations for the center booster failure. Not enough propellant and not enough engines restarted... very different explanations. Which is it??

    SV


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     
  12. Jacob Potts

    Jacob Potts Formula Junior

    Dec 11, 2008
    352
    Pueblo, CO
    Full Name:
    Jacob Potts
  13. jcurry

    jcurry Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 16, 2012
    24,071
    In the past
    Full Name:
    Jim
    Haven't seen anything that characterized it as a mishap. I had heard an explanation that the burn just used all the available fuel which was greater than necessary to get to a Mars orbit, so they exceeded their planned objective.
     
  14. ross

    ross Three Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Mar 25, 2002
    37,972
    houston/geneva
    Full Name:
    Ross
    yes. apparently they also needed to show the ability to push beyond just an orbital velocity. so it was plan b, but on purpose.
     
  15. teak360

    teak360 F1 World Champ

    Nov 3, 2003
    10,065
    Boulder, CO
    Full Name:
    Scott
    Great video. Those two boosters landing is something worthy of the overused word awesome.
     
  16. tazandjan

    tazandjan Three Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Jul 19, 2008
    39,163
    Clarksville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    Terry H Phillips
    Elon said they miscalculated fuel required on the center booster. Easy to do. At least they did not screw up the conversion from km to nm like one company did.
     

Share This Page