Fantasy Airliner / Survivable System | FerrariChat

Fantasy Airliner / Survivable System

Discussion in 'Aviation Chat' started by bushwhacker, Sep 4, 2013.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. bushwhacker

    bushwhacker In Memoriam

    May 25, 2006
    8,883
    Phoenix Az.
    Full Name:
    Dennis
    #1 bushwhacker, Sep 4, 2013
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2013
    I have often wondered why the airline industry has never developed an airliner with escape pods.? Possibly four to five Kevlar reinforced sections that would break away in case of an aircraft failure that float to earth on giant parachutes. Similar to the F 111 system but larger.(insert Terry's comments here).;)
    The pods would float as well in a water based landing and be equipped with emergency GPS beacons and strobes.
    Imagine the security passengers would feel in flying in such an aircraft, I know that when flying in fighter aircraft I always felt more secure knowing that the ejection seat was there.
    Obviously development and production cost is a factor here but with the new technologies and ingenuity available today I am sure such a system could be developed for the betterment of all.
    What's the forum's thoughts?
     
  2. alexm

    alexm F1 Veteran

    Sep 6, 2004
    5,223
    Coast up from Sydney
    Full Name:
    Alex
    #2 alexm, Sep 4, 2013
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2013
    Structural integrity and design issues? costs? complexity? reliability? Can it fit everyone? Ejection criteria, mechanism and weight? Performance as in ability to clear the aircraft under which circumstances?

    I'm also assuming on the ground it's preferable to get squashed by a few rows of seats than an entire aircraft?

    Just throwing some initial thoughts out there ;)
     
  3. Aedo

    Aedo F1 Rookie

    Feb 22, 2006
    3,616
    Perth
    Full Name:
    Steve
    Risk vs reward is the key.

    Better to spend the resources to minimise the likelihood of an accident than try to recovery from one. Unlike military aircraft whose big risk is airborne FOD and cars whose accident modes are relatively limited - it would be very difficult to develop a system that could anticipate all eventualities and react appropriately.
     
  4. donv

    donv Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 5, 2002
    26,105
    Portland, Oregon
    Full Name:
    Don
    Because that mode of failure in an airliner is very, very unlikely. The only airliner I can think of which suffered an in-flight breakup (at least in the US) was Alaska 261, around 15 years ago. And, I'm not sure that they would have used such a system, if they had it-- they thought they would be able to land safely up until only a minute or less before they crashed.

    I suppose SwissAir could have used such a system back in the 90s, as well.

    Still, very very unlikely-- 2 accidents over a period of 20 years where it might have been useful, compared with how many hundreds of thousands of flights in that time period? And this system would add weight and fuel cost to every flight.
     
  5. rdefabri

    rdefabri Three Time F1 World Champ

    Jun 4, 2008
    33,571
    NJ
    Full Name:
    Rich
    There are pods - a company called "Life Armor" makes something like the Air Force One Escape Pod from Escape from New York.

    As to whether they could be used on a plane, unsure. But perhaps they have chutes on them and when the plane has an issue, you get into the pod and it's released.

    Sounds easy...but of course reality is it's not so simple, hence why it's not really been built or perfected...at least not from my pea-brain.
     
  6. teak360

    teak360 F1 World Champ

    Nov 3, 2003
    10,065
    Boulder, CO
    Full Name:
    Scott
    This.
    And it has been tens of millions of flights in 20 years. We are now at more than 10 million per year! You will more likely win the lottery (by a wide margin) than endure an in flight catastrophic failure in a passenger plane.
     
  7. Juan-Manuel Fantango

    Juan-Manuel Fantango F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 18, 2004
    14,607
    Full Name:
    Juan
    Yes, the center tube should be "blasted" away by exploding bolts, retro rockets will fire, as though in one big ejection seat, and an armada of parachutes will deploy with a large flotation device for water landings or to soften an earth landing for the passengers." This system will be made obsolete by the transporter and brainiac system that will allow us to experience being there without physically going anywhere, all in the comfort of your home. Travel will become obsolete, and the carbon footprint of aviation will be forever eradicated, making the greenies, our overseers and lords truly satisfied. Yes, this was done in Brainstorm..one of my favorite cult classics Brainstorm (1983) - IMDb. But who doesn't like Walken, and it was Natale Woods last movie, and a very cool device. It will happen, I just don't if it will be in my lifetime.
     
  8. jcurry

    jcurry Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 16, 2012
    24,071
    In the past
    Full Name:
    Jim
    #8 jcurry, Sep 4, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  9. kylec

    kylec F1 Rookie
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 9, 2005
    3,670
    Orlando
    Lolz!
     
  10. tazandjan

    tazandjan Three Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Jul 19, 2008
    39,163
    Clarksville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    Terry H Phillips
    The pyro required to separate capsules from an airliner would be a real headache and need to be changed at regular intervals, requiring depot level maintenance and ripping the entire aircraft apart. F-111s used a 30,000 lbst solid rocket motor for a 3000 lb capsule. Would require something much larger for an airliner. Large chute for the F-111, huge ones for airliners.

    It would probably double the cost and close to that on weight to build an airliner with that kind of capability.
     
  11. Crawler

    Crawler F1 Veteran

    Jul 2, 2006
    5,018
    Don't you mean the movie Air Force One? I don't remember that in Escape from NY.
     
  12. donv

    donv Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 5, 2002
    26,105
    Portland, Oregon
    Full Name:
    Don
    Escape From NY had an escape pod thingy as well. That's how the President ended up in New York and needed to be rescued.

     
  13. James_Woods

    James_Woods F1 World Champ

    May 17, 2006
    12,755
    Dallas, Tx.
    Full Name:
    James K. Woods
    Tom Swift would be very proud of this thread. He would now be engineering them into the Flying Lab with the nuclear jet lifters.
     
  14. Juan-Manuel Fantango

    Juan-Manuel Fantango F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 18, 2004
    14,607
    Full Name:
    Juan
    #14 Juan-Manuel Fantango, Sep 4, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    You can see it in this trailer if it will play-so hit trailer. Eerie to watch this, and to be reminded how mega the World Trade Centers really were and what was to come. The glider scene is cool as well.

    Note: the pods are disaster pods someone is marketing and not the escape pod for Air Force One. The real one is I think from a B-58 Hustler.

    Escape from New York (1981) - IMDb

    Here is a video on the Convair B-58 HUSTLER Escape Module Development . (Again, I seem to have trouble with getting the video box to show. Sometimes it does, most times it does not).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=lGX0l_p6OqE
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  15. rdefabri

    rdefabri Three Time F1 World Champ

    Jun 4, 2008
    33,571
    NJ
    Full Name:
    Rich
    Yup - one of my all time favorite movies!

    "Get me to the pod!!!" (so says the English-born President played by Donald Pleasence - RIP!)
     

Share This Page