Ferrari looking for allies to delay/ change 2013 engine | FerrariChat

Ferrari looking for allies to delay/ change 2013 engine

Discussion in 'F1' started by Chicko, Jan 1, 2011.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Chicko

    Chicko Formula 3

    Ferrari president Luca Di Montezemolo is keen on delaying the introduction of Formula One's new engine formula, which is set to power the sport from 2013 onwards.

    When the FIA recently announced that four-cylinder engines would be introduced in 2013, Montezemolo expressed some displeasure, before adding he 'wouldn't stand in the way' of change.

    Now though, it seems the Italian is looking for allies in an attempt to delay or completely scrap the new regulations.

    "We won't be building any four-cylinder engines for our street cars," he told Auto Motor und Sport.

    "A Four-cylinder engine, it sounds, for the top tier of motorsport, a bit puny.

    "Why could we not agree on a V6 Turbo? We should not confuse affordable with cheap."

    The 63-year-old is hoping other engine manufacturers, particularly Mercedes, will support him in delaying the changes.

    "If there is the slightest possibility to delay the four-cylinder [regulations], I'll try, I perceive a chance, but we need unity."






    http://www.thef1times.com/news/display/02473
     
  2. Tifoso1

    Tifoso1 F1 Rookie

    Nov 18, 2003
    2,603
    Pacific NW
    Full Name:
    Anthony C.
    I can only hope that Mercedes and Renault share the same view on this issue as Ferrari.
     
  3. Remy Zero

    Remy Zero Two Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2005
    23,476
    KL, Malaysia
    Full Name:
    MC Cool Breeze
    +1

    bring back the V10s...
     
  4. SSNISTR

    SSNISTR F1 Veteran

    Feb 13, 2004
    8,046
    SFL
    You mean the V12's. :D

    Hell, I'd take anything but the 4 bangers....
     
  5. rmani

    rmani F1 Veteran
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Nov 1, 2003
    7,334
    NJ
    Full Name:
    RMani
    +100000000000000000000
     
  6. Chicko

    Chicko Formula 3

    I would expect Renault will be all for small displacement 4 cylinders motors, as the majority of there road cars sales have this configuration.

    Ferrari might be able to get Cosworth on side, although i would expect Cosworth will be happy to see a dramatic engine shake up, as it gives them a chance to claw back ground to the others. Cosworth also have a long history of 4-pot turbos.

    Ferrari's best bet will be Mercedes, certainly from a road car marketing point of view.

    But what might go against Ferrari in this situation, is signals being made by VAG Group (VW, Audi, Porsche etc) wanting to enter F1.
    VAG have said before that they would enter only when the engine regulations become more affordable and relevant.
    The FIA and FOM are desperate for another big engine manufacturer to enter F1 since the pull out of BMW, Honda and Toyota. Especially since Renaults inclusion seems to becoming more fragile with every passing season, and Cosworth being limited in terms of finance and resources.

    V6's do seem to be the logical choice of configuration though, as Mercedes, Renault, VW/Audi and even Ferrari all have long history with them.
    I would not be surprised to see Ferrari building an all new V6 turbo engine in the near future to comply with the ever increasingly stringent emissions law, and fit it to either the next gen California or even for a lower tier light weight model below the existing range.
     
  7. oss117

    oss117 F1 Rookie

    Jan 26, 2006
    4,185
    Plantation, Florida
    Full Name:
    Alfredo
    +1 !!!
     
  8. Daytonafan

    Daytonafan F1 Rookie

    Oct 18, 2003
    2,748
    Surrey, England
    Full Name:
    Matthew
    I'd go for something completely socially irrelevant and standardise Flat 12's now they would sound good.
     
  9. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    May 12, 2007
    26,826
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    Whoever builds the best with the given parameters wins.
     
  10. of2worlds

    of2worlds F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 6, 2004
    18,354
    ON
    Full Name:
    CH
    I thought the Ferrari team had a special 'VETO' clause for any major rule change it did not approve of in F1?
    CH
     
  11. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    May 12, 2007
    26,826
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    A deal cut with Mosley and Co ...he has gone.
     
  12. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,672
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    As long as they don't run on Diesel I'm happy
     
  13. 4rePhill

    4rePhill F1 Veteran

    Oct 18, 2009
    8,266
    Worcester, England
    Full Name:
    Phill J
    Amen to that! ;)
     
  14. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,692
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    Mercedes is putting fours in cars way up in their model line these days. If anything they'd want to "legitimize" them.
     
  15. 4rePhill

    4rePhill F1 Veteran

    Oct 18, 2009
    8,266
    Worcester, England
    Full Name:
    Phill J
    +1 On that, and they'll push for it even more if they think it will hamper Ferrari!.
     
  16. Ferrari 360 CS

    Ferrari 360 CS F1 Veteran

    Dec 4, 2004
    6,892
    Cape Town,SA
    Full Name:
    Jacques
    #16 Ferrari 360 CS, Jan 2, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2011
    This really is ridiculous, 4 cylinder engines in motorsports premier formula...cutting cost is irrelevant as F1 will never be cheap so why not allow more freedom in enigine choice and why not bring back mid season testing. The whole cost issue in my opinion is mis-guided purely because no new teams are arriving anyway and those that are in F1 are by a large there for the long haul.

    Surely the spectator also matter, I cant see too many people clambering to see 4 cylinder F1 cars.

    To be honest I miss the days when if Enzo didnt like something he threatened to pull out....that usually got the attention of the governing body.
     
  17. beast

    beast F1 World Champ

    May 31, 2003
    11,479
    Lewisville, TX
    Full Name:
    Rob Guess
    I honestly don't care for the turbo 4 banger rule. If F1 is looking to promote new tech to be developed into future automotive applications they need to be thinking out of the box.

    Ilmor had been developing a 5 stroke engine the past couple of years

    http://www.ilmor.co.uk/concept_5-stroke_1.php

    Why not take that concept and run with it everyone will be starting with a clean slate???
     
  18. RP

    RP F1 World Champ

    Feb 9, 2005
    17,667
    Bocahuahua, Florxico
    Full Name:
    Tone Def
    Small displacement V-8s. Every street car manufacturer in F1 has V-8 model. The technology gained from F1 V-8s could be used in future street cars.

    That could also open the door to more engine suppliers like Audi/Porsche/VW/Lambo, BMW, Toyota, Nissan, etc. And why not attract US companies like Chevrolet and Ford?

    Besides, V-8s can be made to sound really great. I can not begin to imagine the sound of a 4 cylinder, with or without the blow job.
     
  19. Ferrari 360 CS

    Ferrari 360 CS F1 Veteran

    Dec 4, 2004
    6,892
    Cape Town,SA
    Full Name:
    Jacques
    Agreed but the sad fact is F1 is seemingly not run but car enthusiasts....
     
  20. Chicko

    Chicko Formula 3


    Your right. So i guess we will have to wait and see what Mercedes stance on the matter is, as it could be for or against.
     
  21. Tokyo Drftr

    Tokyo Drftr Formula 3

    Jan 18, 2009
    2,461
    UA-USA-JP
    Full Name:
    Ро&#1081
    i'd hate to see a ferrari road car with 4 cylinder.......turbo or not.........leave that in a MV agusta.......
     
  22. rdefabri

    rdefabri Three Time F1 World Champ

    Jun 4, 2008
    33,571
    NJ
    Full Name:
    Rich
    Ferrari could dust off the 637 and run Indy if they don't like the new engine spec :)
     
  23. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,748
    I must be the only one to like 4-pot turbo.

    In a 1500cc turbo formula, I think that the preferable engine configuration, superior to V6 or V8. With small engine capacity, it doesn't pay to have so many cylinders if you go turbo.

    I thought that BMW proved that many years ago when Piquet's Brabham-BMW 4-pot turbo defeated Renault, Ferrari and others to win the WDC.

    A 4-pot will be lighter and being smaller is easily packaged in a car. It can be lay-down (like the last Brabham-BMW, it also gives less complexity with the exhaust, has a lower centre of gravity, etc...
    Without talking about the mechanical simplicity itself: 2 overhead camshaft instead of 4, etc...

    Even Ferrari had 2 cylinder engines in the past: 500 Mondial.
     
  24. Iain

    Iain F1 Rookie

    Jan 21, 2005
    3,335
    UK
    Dunno why Luca is so worried - he wants to get the boys to design a 4 pot turbo that works at an incline of oh say 45 degrees .....





    ....then he can weld two of them together, detune it & a bit & stick 'em in a road car :D
     
  25. SSNISTR

    SSNISTR F1 Veteran

    Feb 13, 2004
    8,046
    SFL
    #25 SSNISTR, Jan 2, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2011
    V12, F12, I'd just love to see 12 cylinders. Biggest issue with an F12 is it is too wide though.
     

Share This Page