FerrariChat.com Official: New structure for model specific? | Page 2 | FerrariChat

FerrariChat.com Official: New structure for model specific?

Discussion in 'Ferrari Discussion (not model specific)' started by rob lay, Apr 3, 2006.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

?

New structure for model specific?

  1. Leave as is

  2. Prefer new proposal

  3. Indifferent

Multiple votes are allowed.
Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. staceman

    staceman Karting

    Sep 23, 2003
    245
    At Home
    Full Name:
    SGT
    Change is good. I like your new Idea Rob . . . it's more specific which is quite useful to someone like me who's reading impaired! Go for it.
     
  2. Brian C. Stradale

    Brian C. Stradale F1 Rookie
    Lifetime Rossa

    Mar 17, 2002
    3,615
    Dallas, TX, USA
    But then if you want to do a search for some info on the 355, you'll have to search in two forums... in Classic for the more recent posts on the 355 and in Modern for the older posts.

    I think the forum definitions need to be "stable"... cars shouldn't need regular shifting. If we don't change to the suggested model-oriented breakdown, then I'd be inclined to say that when the "Modern" section gets too fat, over time, then we break it at an appropriate generation-change, and name the generation.

    But I think the proposed breakout is good.
     
  3. MufflerMan

    MufflerMan Formula 3

    Jun 12, 2005
    1,564
    Sacramento Ca
    Full Name:
    Colby Sandman
    My only gripe would be more segregation. I think people with 355's aren't far from the same category as a 360. That said, it would make the searches easier and more specific.
     
  4. GabeH

    GabeH Rookie

    Apr 3, 2006
    10
    Grand Rapids, MI, US
    Full Name:
    Gabe
    The new proposal makes great sense to me...
     
  5. SIVAN

    SIVAN Karting

    Jun 6, 2004
    122
    Lake Forest, CA
    Full Name:
    Si Van Nguyen
    I like the new format proposal too. May I digress a little bit and suggest that FCHAT starts a Gallery section, one that is easy for members to upload their pictures to, and maybe open to only subscribers. May be even separate galleries under each model in case one combined gallery is not enough. Keep up the good work!
    SiVan
     
  6. Horsefly

    Horsefly F1 Veteran

    May 14, 2002
    6,929
    Add a REPLICA section. It's been needed for a long time. As the vintage cars continue to march beyond the $1,000,000 price level, no normal human can afford them, much less risk their value by driving them. So the repro, replica, fantasy, tribute cars will hold much interest. The purists may frown, but better to have a replica to drive and play with over a stack of Ferrari picture books on a coffee table.
     
  7. rob lay

    rob lay Administrator
    Staff Member Admin Miami 2018 Owner Social Subscribed

    Dec 1, 2000
    64,350
    Southlake, TX
    Full Name:
    Rob Lay
    IMHO Replicas should be in OT. Model Specific if the base for the Replica is a Ferrari and place it in model specific of the base, not what it is pretending to be. Recreations if using correct parts can go in proper model specific.

    I know potential for being my biggest character flaw, but I am one of those purists and I can't bring myself to have a replica forum on FerrariChat.com.
     
  8. Newman

    Newman F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner Professional Ferrari Technician

    Dec 26, 2001
    14,523
    Canada
    Full Name:
    Newman
    Thank you
     
  9. djs308

    djs308 Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    Sep 2, 2002
    1,137
    Long Island, NY
    Full Name:
    David S.
    I agree that a Mondial "t" should stick with the other Mondials. It's one "series".

    A different question is whether to put "racing" versions of models as a separate category, ie: 348, 355 and 360 Challenge cars. Or just have a general "racing" section with cars like the 333sp, 550GTC, F1, etc. Or... would this fit into the existing "racing & tracking" category?
     
  10. Horsefly

    Horsefly F1 Veteran

    May 14, 2002
    6,929
    I just thought that a specific REPLICA section would quiet the squabbling that ensues whenever somebody discusses a FERRARI powered car that has a replica chassis or body. For example, that ZZ Top guy's GTO spyder that was widely discussed in the VINTAGE section. It was basically a fantasy REPLICA that did not relate to any real car. But most everybody entered into the discussion about it. It certainly wasn't built on a real GTO chassis. I just thought that a REPLICA section would be ideal for such cars that have no relation to a real Ferrari except the engine. Even Enzo himself extoled the virtues of the engine as being the heart of the beast.
     
  11. Mbutner

    Mbutner Formula 3

    Aug 11, 2005
    1,689
    Bay Area / Washington DC
    Full Name:
    Quick Draw
    I think that the new proposed format is a great idea. However, I think you mods are giving yourselves a ton of work. I mean when somebody posts about the wrong forum. With it being much more specific, the searching for the appropriate topic will be easy.

    my $.02
     
  12. cbreed

    cbreed Formula Junior

    May 10, 2005
    296
    Jonestown, Tx
    Full Name:
    Charles
    yes, PLEASE add some granularity. I waste too much time looking for relavant content in the "Modern" section. the sooner the better!
     
  13. jsa330

    jsa330 F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Oct 31, 2003
    10,059
    75225
    Full Name:
    Scott
    I almost never go anywhere but vintage, so I went with indifferent.

    Adding the Dino subforum to Vintage was a good idea; an additional subforum about Vintage-based replicars wouldn't offend my sensibilities any...I think it would make Vintage a stronger and more-visited forum.
     
  14. F SPIDER

    F SPIDER F1 Rookie
    Owner

    Jan 30, 2002
    2,873
    NYC, A'dam, W'stock
    Full Name:
    rijk rietveld
    I like the current structure, with one extra catagory. In addittion to "modern", you could add "current" for the 430, 599 and 612 models.
     
  15. John Corbani

    John Corbani Formula 3
    Honorary Owner

    May 5, 2005
    1,153
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Full Name:
    John Corbani
    New breakdown sounds good to me. Allows easy searching back and forth a few years. Go for it.
    Forget replicas.

    John
     
  16. j15

    j15 F1 Rookie

    Jan 5, 2005
    2,624
    Sydney Australia
    Full Name:
    Jeh
    I like that idea
     

Share This Page